Why the "inch per gallon rule" is usually inaccurate

Dwarf Puffers

Registered user
Dec 11, 2006
3,978
0
0
NS, Canada
I've been seeing a lot of new members using this "rule" and handing out advice that may not be correct, so I'm going to list the reasons I know of why it isn't usually very accurate.

1. This one is pretty obvious, but I might as well say it. You can't put a 10" oscar in a 10 gallon tank, or two 5" gold gouramis either. The "inch per gallon rule" does not take into affect size of fish. And don't believe the other :bs: notion that a fish will grow to the size of it's tank. A fish will grow until stunting kicks in, and after that, it has little time to live.

2. You can't keep 10 tetras that belong to 10 species in a 10 gallon tank. The "inch per gallon rule" does not take into affect the needs of different species and sexes. Some fish need more space for territory. Some need schools. Some need a certain male/female ratio. Some need more swimming room than their small frame would suggest. Many get much bigger than their small frame would suggest, as well.

3. You have to think about the adult size of the fish. You can't keep 10 oscars in a 10g just because they're all an inch long. Oscars, for instance, can get 18" long, and 1 alone needs a tank 10x bigger than a 10 gallon. Many fish stores give 10 goldfish to new fishkeepers, giving them a shove down the hill that ends in wasted money and wasted fishy lives.

4. It doesn't take consideration the length of fish or large waste producers, like plecos. A 3" kuhli loach might make as much waste as a 2" dwarf gourami, but the "inch per gallon rule" doesn't include that. A 1" dwarf puffer can be as dirty as a school of 6 neons, but the "rule" doesn't both to mention that.

In the end, it is a sketchy rule of thumb that was made by people who didn't know enough to decide upon it. I wouldn't be surprised if it was made up by a LFS employee out there and was eventually treated as law. Think of it as this: There isn't a rule that 3 people in a living room will become friends. Why should there be a rule like for fish?

P.S: If anyone wants to add or comment (constructive critism only please), feel free to do so. Thanks,

-DP ;)
 
As quoted from a member (Guppy) of monsterfishkeepers he got a sticky on their website.. and he says
This is something that comes up fairly often and is rather misunderstood therefore I will attempt to clarify the original meaning of the general guideline of "one inch of fish per gallon of water".

This is a suggested guideline for a well maintained and filtered tank.
It does not apply to all fish as some have differing requirements.

Here is the part that is being misunderstood.

The "rule" does NOT refer to the length of the fish!

The "rule" applies to the cubic inches of fish in the tank.

This means that a 5" gourami should be measured in this manner,
length overall (5"),
thickness, (1/2"),
height, (2 1/2"),
so for this fish you multiply the following, 5x 1/2x 2 1/2, this gives you a total of 6 1/4 gallons of water.

For small fish like glo-light tetras you will end up with something like this,
1 1/2"x 1/4"x1/2", this comes to 3/16 of a gallon (about 1/5), and that gives you 5 fish of this size per gallon (quite reasonable)

For larger fish you end up with something like this, my example here will be a silver arowana at 24" long, 24"x 4"x 1", which gives you 100 gallons of water.

As you can see this works fairly well.

You do also have to apply some common sense and allow for such things as potential growth, the fish types' tolerance for crowding, and of course the width and length of the tank (a 24" gar will not work in an 18" wide tank even if the tank holds 100 gallons).

So please people, accept that this is just a generalized guideline to figure potential stocking levels, not a hard and fast rule.
Also remember that just because you don't like it doesn't mean you should slam somebody for using it.
And lastly, please don't flame someone by saying a 10" oscar doesn't fit in a 10" tank.
Of course it doesn't,
but the rule never said it would.
 
I disagree, very politely. :grinyes:

I have been around for enough years to know the one inch rule never encompassed anything but length.

guppy may have a better version of using it's calculation to include a second and third dimension, but they still leave out too many issues that need to be taken into consideration.

IMO, it shouldn't even be considered for any calculation. The rule may not say it would, but it states that it can, indirectly, and that is why so many fish die foolishly.
 
im with rbishop...it just doesnt work at all.

5 glolites in 1 gallon of water is even worse than the inch per gallon rule.

a silver aro needs 300 gallons, not 100.

I agree. How does that even make sense?

So I guess I can shove 150 glo-lites into my 30 gallon. Sounds reasonable...:wall:
 
I don't know a better method of figuring out a way to stock, but definitely the inch per gallon doesn't make sense for a couple other reasons.

A 12" fish makes more bioload than 12 1" fish.

It also doesn't take into account the surface area for oxygen absorption into the tank. Longer takes can house more fish than taller tanks.
 
I never said i agreed or disagreed with the post.. i just posted it :lipssealedsmilie:


but hey heres a good debate lol get guppy over here and we shall have a MF/AC meet

Correct bk, and I never meant to imply you agreed with it. My disagreement was with the statements made in the post you pulled and posted here.

Just as word of mouth reinforces myths, so does just posting what somebody says. The newbies or inexperienced folks are not going to read all the details and amplifying facts.

They are going to walk away with the decision that it can be used.
 
I never said i agreed or disagreed with the post.. i just posted it :lipssealedsmilie:


but hey heres a good debate lol get guppy over here and we shall have a MF/AC meet
You never did.:) Bob was only disagreeing politely to Guppy's post in MFK.:grinyes:
 
I don't know a better method of figuring out a way to stock, but definitely the inch per gallon doesn't make sense for a couple other reasons.

A 12" fish makes more bioload than 12 1" fish.

It also doesn't take into account the surface area for oxygen absorption into the tank. Longer takes can house more fish than taller tanks.

Thats why AC is here ;)
 
AquariaCentral.com