View Full Version : Difference betwen HQI and HID
jmhart
10-13-2008, 12:55 PM
So I'm in the beginning stages of putting together my 180g tank(by putting together, I mean, in Excel as a proposed budget/purchase list, not physically). I'm leaning towards a 3x~150w MH and 4x80w T5 retrokit available on Catalina Aquarium.
My question: What's the difference between HID and HQI? From my searches, it seems that all HQI are HID, but when something is listed as HID and another is HQI, what's the difference? It seems that HQI is single ended, smaller, and more intense. Is this the basic difference.
I'm looking at two fixtures:
3x150w HQI/4x80w T5 for $950
3x175w HID/4x80w T5 for $600.
My plan is for the T5 to be my primary lighting for 8 hours a day, but run the MH for ~3 hours a day as a burst/for my viewing pleasure.
For my needs, is there any reason to get the HQI? It would sell so much easier to my wife if I can use the HID's. I'm in the range of $2200 for the upgrade from a 45g to a 180g tank, so cutting my cost I can is a big plus.
Sploke
10-13-2008, 1:11 PM
I thought HQI was double ended?
jmhart
10-13-2008, 1:20 PM
You're probably right...I really don't know. I looked it up last night, but I haven't been taking my ginko baloba, so I very easily could have switched the two.
Sploke
10-13-2008, 1:33 PM
Ok, here is my take on how I understand the fancy lighting market. This is all based on my research into MH lighting for a reef setup, mostly from RC.
HID lighting is a general category that encompasses metal halide, high pressure sodium, T5HO, and mercury vapor. Any high-intensity fluorescent technology, as far as I can tell.
HQI are smaller, double ended bulbs and usually (or always?) run on electronic ballasts.
Regular single-ended MH bulbs (sometimes referred to as "mogul-base" - larger than a regular incandescent base) come in a few different flavors. There are pulse-start, probe-start and regular ones. The pulse-start and probe-start need the appropriate ballast (magnetic or electronic) to provide the arc to initiate the bulb to start burning, and as far as I can tell, they are not cross-compatible. There are also single ended MH bulbs that behave like HQI, with an electronic ballast providing the arc to get the bulb going rather than a mechanism inside the bulb itself (as a pulse-start or probe-start bulb has.)
Sploke
10-13-2008, 1:37 PM
the links in here should clear up most of your questions
http://archive.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=624185
My understanding is that arc-tubes in HID bulbs produce visible light, fluoro bulbs don't. In addition to high pressure and heat, that is. I wouldn't consider T5's High-Intensity Discharge.
Really, they're smaller, so they pack a lot of light into a tight area. And it's not just the bulb size, but the size of the arc tube. Even Power-Compact fluoros have a massive surface area compared to the tiny space an MH arc-tube takes up. For a lot of aquarium applications I can see this not being important. For very dense foliage, HID lamps are the best(only?) way to get light to the lower leaves and plants.
Edit:
Ooops ;)
HQI is a type of HID lighting. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrargyrum_quartz_iodide I guess, a sub-type of MH?
I don't think that HQI has anything to do with the bulb being double-ended. I know HID doesn't.
jones57742
10-14-2008, 3:10 PM
My plan is for the T5 to be my primary lighting for 8 hours a day, but run the MH for ~3 hours a day as a burst/for my viewing pleasure.
Jeff:
You are way senior when it comes to plants and although I was way out of pocket when you posted your first thread I just flat could not post in order to provide input which was disappointing as you have helped me a bunch.
Still not running good but I am glad that, I believe, the tank which you decided on is a 6'x2'x2' which was where that I was headed if I could have posted. The 2' deep and 2' wide is first class wrt maintenance and the 6' fits the standard lighting dimensions.
You are "right on track" with the MH for 3 to 4 hours per day not only for viewing but also for your plants.
IMHO trash can the T5 concept and go with PC (I actually did this with several $K worth of T5 when it was not a concept).
IMHO also trash can the HID concept as this form factor is off breed from the mainstream and will probably go away with time.
On my 36" tank I have two PC's and one MH.
When I trash canned the T5's I replaced them with my first PC (http://www.marinedepot.com/ps_ViewItem~action~view~idProduct~CU01014~idCatego ry~FILTFIPCTH~category~30in_Units-Power_Compact-Fixtures-Lighting-Saltwater_Aquarium_Supplies~vendor~.html) fixture.
This was in my very early fish keeping days and obviously when I powered up this fixture on my tank I ordered another identical fixture.
For several months I experimented with varying fert concentrations and lamps (the final one in that configuration was three 10000K bulbs and one 7100K bulb).
Still not being happy with my plant health and growth I ordered a HQI-MH fixture. (http://www.marinedepot.com/ps_ViewItem~action~view~idProduct~CU01063~idCatego ry~FILTFIMHMMMDMLM5~category~36in~vendor~.html)
After a year of experimenting this is what I have:
One 6700K PC bulb in the back;
One 10000K PC bulb next;
Two 10000K MH bulbs next;
One 10000K PC bulb next; and
One 7100K PC bulb in the front.
I am still experimenting with fert concentrations and lighting durations.
The lighting permutations and combinations include but are not limited to what you proposed in addition to varying the MH period, alternating PC on/off and MH days on/off, etc.
TR
BTW: When you get into your wet/dry filtration thread I hope that I can provide some decent input.
Sploke
10-14-2008, 3:34 PM
What is your reasoning behind using PC over T5HO? Given the choice I'd rather the T5HO - the PCs lose some efficiency with restrike due to the design of two narrow tubes side by side.
jmhart
10-14-2008, 3:42 PM
Jones,
Regarding HID vs HQI, I was curious about that. I wasn't sure if one of them was destined to go the way of the Dodo. It woudl be a shame to buy a fixture and then not be able to acquire bulbs for it with in a few years.
Why do you recommend PC over T5? I currently use T5, but a majority of the members of the local plant club suggest T5 over PC....I can't say I've heard a good argument for either one.
Where do you purchase your 7100k PC bulbs? I currently use 36" 96w PC bulbs, but have only been able to find 6700k and 10,000 bulbs. One of the draws of the T5 is greater bulb variety.
Finally, I've haven't fully decided on filtration. I'm leaning towards 2 Eheim 2128's with some plumbing for inline instrumentation. I may include a sump, but only if I seal up the "dry" section to prevent co2 loss.
Mgamer20o0
10-14-2008, 4:09 PM
t5 ho are better then pc. they run cooler and get more light into the tank more so when you have individual reflectors. the price have been coming down too. more and more people will be switching to them. personally i would just go with a full t5 ho set up. mh might look good but i dont want to deal with the heat. on the subject of hqu and hid i have no clue.
jones57742
10-20-2008, 7:51 PM
Jeff:
Please excuse me for taking so long to get back with you but long sad story - health (no humor here - I bearly made it to and then had to leave the MO game before the 4th quarter)
Why do you recommend PC over T5? I currently use T5, but a majority of the members of the local plant club suggest T5 over PC....I can't say I've heard a good argument for either one.
I really got wore out with the weight of the hood into which the T5's were attached as well as the heat generated by the ballast (this configuration came from the Tenecor factory) and when the ballast became a crispy critter one day I began researching.
I would like to go into a long winded story concerning all the information which I derived from the research but first rattle out of the box I found this (http://www.marinedepot.com/ps_ViewItem~action~view~idProduct~CU01014~idCatego ry~FILTFIPCTH~category~30in_Units-Power_Compact-Fixtures-Lighting-Saltwater_Aquarium_Supplies~vendor~.html) on the Marine Depot site (I had previously purchased from them) and these could be placed on the acrylic top of the tank without legs.
I was fairly a noobie then (as if I am not one still) but was far enough along to request 10KK and 7.1KK bulbs but not far enough along such that a week later I did not have to order a second fixture (I have a 110G tank) as well as an assortment of bulbs with which to experiment (please note that these fixtures have two cords and two switches).
This configuration was first class as I really had my plants growing with liquid ferts, one 6.7KK bulb in the rear, two 10KK bulbs in the middle and one 7.1KK bulb in the front. Plants requiring varying light intensities can be placed in the tank with these bulbs. (As you are aware, via several of my posts, I have now migrated to and am experimenting with dry ferts and HQI-MH (http://www.marinedepot.com/ps_ViewItem~action~view~idProduct~CU01063~idCatego ry~FILTFIMHMMMDMLM5~category~36in~vendor~.html) augmenting the PC lighting [I have recently replaced the 14KK bulbs with 10KK bulbs].)
Where do you purchase your 7100k PC bulbs? I currently use 36" 96w PC bulbs, but have only been able to find 6700k and 10,000 bulbs. One of the draws of the T5 is greater bulb variety.
Marine Depot. (http://www.marinedepot.com/ps_ViewItem.aspx?action=view&idProduct=PC1404&idCategory=FILTBUPCSQSWAB&category=Actinic__Blue-65_Watts-Square_Pin-Power_Compact-Bulbs-Lighting-Saltwater_Aquarium_Supplies&vendor=&child=PC1652)
Finally, I've haven't fully decided on filtration. I'm leaning towards 2 Eheim 2128's with some plumbing for inline instrumentation. I may include a sump, but only if I seal up the "dry" section to prevent co2 loss.
I have limited experience with a cannister filter and this experience was with an Eheim.
Please keep in mind that:
[1] the pumps in cannister filters, although very high flow, are very low head pumps;
[2] cannisters, although typically touted for high end mechanical filtration, are not; and
[3] you will need (as best as I remember) 3/8" barb fittings to get from the 9mm Eheim tubing to 3/8" tubing.
"Sealing the dry section" is not a problem and is done with four thumb screws through an access plate.
As you can tell I am "hot to trot" on wet/dry due to the quantity and type of biological and mechanical filtration media which can be employed.
In your case a positive displacement pump could also inject fertilizers directly into the last chamber of the sump and your CO2 could be injected into the tank water at the outflow orifice of the sump.
TR