View Full Version : which camera setting looks better??
nguyendetecting
11-17-2008, 5:37 PM
please tell me which camera setting out of these 3 photos you think look better. thanks =)
No flash was used, no photo editing was done to these photos except brightness. Camera settings allowed me to choose florescent, daylight, and flash lighting. All 6500k light bulbs
Rallysman
11-17-2008, 5:39 PM
What's the lighting? The first looks the most accurate, but that could be off if your lighting is slightly blue.
edit: just read the part about the bulbs. I'd say #3 based on that
Virtuoso2K12
11-17-2008, 5:51 PM
they all look amazing,but in my opinion the third seems more natural to me.
prolude006
11-17-2008, 6:01 PM
First one is a different angle???
They are real close to the same too, take three more at same angle then Ill tell ya!!!
stephstar
11-17-2008, 6:04 PM
All of them have their merits, it is what you want to create as the artist. If it were my shots, I would be most happy with the second one, those colours appeal to me the most.
nguyendetecting
11-17-2008, 6:19 PM
thanks for the input, it really does help me alot. The problem I have is taking tank shots with flash always gives me a reflection. So I have to shoot it at 1600iso and now I'm just trying the different settings on the camera (nikon d50)
#2 for me
I take pictures with fluorescent setting which normally give blueish photos, but then adjust levels once transferred to pc.
Sounguru
11-17-2008, 6:27 PM
thanks for the input, it really does help me alot. The problem I have is taking tank shots with flash always gives me a reflection. So I have to shoot it at 1600iso and now I'm just trying the different settings on the camera (nikon d50)
Get a tripod and shoot at ISO 100 no flash. Do that then play with your white balance controls.
jm1212
11-17-2008, 6:59 PM
i like the second one the best
Rallysman
11-17-2008, 7:10 PM
Get a tripod and shoot at ISO 100 no flash. Do that then play with your white balance controls.
200 is the lowest you can go with a D50, but 400 noise levels are very low.
nguyendetecting
11-17-2008, 8:40 PM
with iso at 400 and lower I can't seem to get enough light coming in everything looks blurry.
Sounguru
11-17-2008, 10:11 PM
200 is the lowest you can go with a D50, but 400 noise levels are very low.
with iso at 400 and lower I can't seem to get enough light coming in everything looks blurry.
Forgot that 200 is the lowest you can go on most Nikons I run Canon.
Use a tripod and the timer ... Combine that with mirror lock up and you should have no blur... Can't remeber if the D50 was one of the models they left the mirror lock up off or not.
12 Volt Man
11-17-2008, 10:14 PM
#3
Dangerdoll
11-17-2008, 10:22 PM
I really like the 1st one but the second one comes close
nguyendetecting
11-17-2008, 10:24 PM
lol thanks for the input all, it seems some are more natural but some are clearer if that makes any sense. I thought I was the one that was being weird for not being able to see which one was the better photo. But I guess not lol, got some great advice from everyone so far I will try them all out when I get back home.
FISHSHROD
11-17-2008, 11:40 PM
I like 2 but voted 3
Sounguru
11-18-2008, 1:45 AM
1st is the best because it of the angle.....
TH3RD_LEG
11-18-2008, 1:55 AM
I like number 2 as 1 and 3 look kind of yellowed.
Luis
Mgamer20o0
11-25-2008, 11:38 PM
i like 3
Rbishop
11-28-2008, 5:36 AM
If the angle was consistent, it would be a bit easier for me to compare.
With all being said, I like #1.