With the execution of John Allan Muhammed tonight I was wondering how many of you out there think Lee Boyd Malvo should have recieved the same punishment even though he was only 17?
I kind of think life without parole is more punishment than death. It is over for Muhammed, but Malvo will think about his crime for a long time... And pay for it...
I am not in support of the long delays between conviction and execution, but have seen too many cases of wrongful conviction. There would be far less mistakes if there wasn't so many 'games' played by both the prosecutor and defense. Death penalty is a permanent mistake that cannot be undone and makes for reasonable doubt about its use.
I think there are often mitigating circumstances that could be considered but ultimately, blame comes down to whether or not the perpetrator accepts responsibility for their own actions. Since mitigations are used to justify failure to accept responsibility for ones actions, I feel they should simply be disallowed. But that would mean that certain cases might be unfairly judged too harshly.
In this case, I feel that John Mohamed had too much authority over Boyd. I often agree that perhaps had there been a different influence for Boyd, this wouldn't have occurred. Ultimately, decision to follow was Boyd's choice and as such he should be held accountable to the same standard.
As I stated earlier I too believe he was GREATLY influenced by Mohammed and probably would not have committed these acts had it not been for those influneces.I am not in support of the long delays between conviction and execution, but have seen too many cases of wrongful conviction. There would be far less mistakes if there wasn't so many 'games' played by both the prosecutor and defense. Death penalty is a permanent mistake that cannot be undone and makes for reasonable doubt about its use.
I think there are often mitigating circumstances that could be considered but ultimately, blame comes down to whether or not the perpetrator accepts responsibility for their own actions. Since mitigations are used to justify failure to accept responsibility for ones actions, I feel they should simply be disallowed. But that would mean that certain cases might be unfairly judged too harshly.
In this case, I feel that John Mohamed had too much authority over Boyd. I often agree that perhaps had there been a different influence for Boyd, this wouldn't have occurred. Ultimately, decision to follow was Boyd's choice and as such he should be held accountable to the same standard.