is this the BEST filter setup possible for 50-75g tank?

gagaliya

GNOME POWER!
Nov 20, 2005
943
0
16
NJ
www.happyreward.com
obviously in reasonable price range ( <$500). Best in?

1) easy maintenence
2) 3stage filtration
3) waterflow gph


1x lifegard inline filter set + lifegard fluidized bed filter (biological filter) +lifegard ultraviolet sterilizer module + air pump

compared to the following setup:

1) 2-3x emperor power filters
2) 2x canister filter (insert your preferred brand)
3) 1x magnum pro + biowheeel + 2x emperor power filter

also will UV eliminate common diseases like ich? or rather prevent them from happening. will 1 complete set of lifegard inline filter be enough for a 50-75g tank? thanks
 
You are way overkill in any of the 2 configurations.

Having more filtering is good, but this excess will only harm your wallet.

For a 50-75 gallon tank, a single 300+ gph canister filter will do an excellent work. I run my planted 50 gallont with a Penplax Cascade 1000 (350gph) and it's doing an impressive job there.

If what you want if filtration backup (not relying in 1 only filter), get two smaller canisters or two large HOB filters.

I've read UV sterilizers can be harmful if not set properly. If the flow rate is higher than specified, it may contribute to bacteria proliferation (sp¿?). Not sure about this. I just read it in a discussion forum somewhere else. I just read thei nfo on your links about UV and it says "At the correct flow rates, they kill over 99% of waterborne, disease-causing microorganisms in the water", so this seems to be correct.

Of course, if you want to set up your filtration system with those devices, ity should work great, but IMHO it's not needed. Water changes and good fishkeeping habits should keep your tank disease free with and ordinary filter.
 
To obtain the result, get the recommended size tank for each filter and add it up. This will give your the "standard" combined capacity of the whole filter set up.
 
Tank size is just one important parameter in choosing the best filter option. What kind of tank do you plan on?

Fish: species, number, etc.
Planted vs. non-planted.
Substrate type
Frequency of PWC and cleaning you intend to do.

As stated previously, your references to 2-3 Emperor 400's on a 50-75 gal. tank are way over the top. For example, I run a single Emperor 400 on a planted 55 gal. community tank. I do a 20-30% PWC change every week with glass cleaning. The substrate is a 2" base of Shultz's aquatic soil topped with Estes river gravel. My tank is very clean and the plants/fish are thriving. Would adding one or two additional Emperors to mt set up significantly improve the quality of my tank environment....not likely. The kicker is that I would have the pleasure of cleaning and additional 4-8 filter cartidges every week.
 
I have 2 Emperor 400's and one Emperor 280 on my 75 gallon which houses 1 adult Oscar, a 5" firemouth, a 5" Jack Dempsey, a bristlenost plecostamus, and 8 giant danios.

By far, this is my cleanest and easiest to manage aquarium. I have never had any water quality issues, algae problems, etc etc. I do a simple 50% water change each week and this aquarium looks perfect all the time.
 
sorry guys you are not getting the point of this thread. i am not asking what kind of filter to get or review your setup, i am asking specifically how good are the lifegard inlines filters(full 5 module setup), compared to the traditional canister/powerfilters. Because i dont see many reviews/people using the lifegard setup but they seem to be a very good filter for high bioload and maintaince wise as well. And with added bonus of having built in integration for a heater module and uv module

i know the emperors etc are good power filters, that's not my question.
 
Last edited:
AquariaCentral.com