PDA

View Full Version : Irridecent sharks



Tommy Gun
12-08-2006, 1:44 PM
hey all,

This post is going to go hand in hand with wataugachicken's post entitled "How does this make sense? (rant)" in at least one way. You can read his post here:
http://www.aquariacentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=90338

Anyways, I found a new LFS the other day and found something sort of rare in the hobby as far as livestock that is for sale. I know that in my area at least (and from what I have read from others, probrably common everywhere), that irridecent sharks can be bought from most any LFS. The thing that always gets me about almost all of the fish that have 'shark' attached to their common name is that no LFS has a good way of showing how large these fish are going to get eventually. I know alot of people who just start out, and even some people who have been in the hobby for a while now look to the irridecent shark as a good stocking option because they are small in the store and not always clearly labeled as a potentially large fish. In the LFS yesterday, I saw an ALMOST mature irridecent shark and took a picture of it with my cell phone to share with everyone just how big they can and will get if kept properly:
http://i96.photobucket.com/albums/l162/tommygunnz76/Misc/shark.jpg
As you can see, that is my hand underneath the fish so you can tell just how large it is. While I am not a giant person, I am an adult and this fish is nearly 8 inces long and about a year old according to the LFS owner.

DaisyTattoo
12-08-2006, 1:51 PM
Add about 10 more inches on to that guy and he will then be nearly full grown lol. Those are actually a catfish, which usually means they can get gigantic. Also, ID sharks start looking fat and ugly when full grown such as is shown in the pic

http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i66/jodimartin2003/pangasius1.jpg

Dangerdoll
12-08-2006, 2:24 PM
yeap, I'm with Jodi... that baby is nothing compared to how big they actually do get.
http://www.jjphoto.dk/fish_archive/warm_freshwater/pangasius_hypophthalmus2.jpg

http://www.koi-aquaristik-partner.at/images/zierfische/raubwelse/Pangasius%20hypophthalmus_g.jpg

dorkfish
12-08-2006, 3:00 PM
I had the luck of seeing one a 2 foot long version of one of these at an LFS once. Really a massive fish, not for the small tank, or the large tank. Something along the lines of HUGE is much more fitting.

Shagmaster
12-08-2006, 3:25 PM
I have heard that they get 200+ pounds. I have personaly seen one that was a little under 3' long!

Shagmaster
12-08-2006, 3:27 PM
Should not be kept unless you have a BIG pond planned.

jm1212
12-08-2006, 4:12 PM
in Aquarium Fish Mag. they just had an article for tankbusters like this, and the smallest of the genus gets to over three foeet long, while the biggest gets to over 9!

wataugachicken
12-09-2006, 12:06 AM
i said this in the chat rooms a few days ago - if anyone here eats the asian catfish "basa", it is actually from ID sharks and related species. actually quite good and firm, if bland.