Positives/Negatives of using activated carbon

Yash

Trance Addict
Nov 2, 2006
319
0
0
49
Knoxville, TN
I was wondering what you folks thought were the advantages and/or disadvantages of using activated carbon in a trickle filter. I've heard mixed things about it and wasn't sure if I should use it in my trickle filter or not.

Appreciate any info.

Thanks!
Yash
 
the negative is basically that it's a waste of money. there's little that carbon can do that water changes cannot accomplish for free. removing medication, odor or color is about all carbon is good for.

there are a variety of pollutants dissolved in any aquatic environment containing biological life. dissolved ORGANIC compounds (DOC's) include proteins, amino acids, phenolic compounds, pheromones and other metabolic byproducts which are continuously being exhausted into the aquarium water by the fish or other aquatic animals. if these organic substances are allowed to become concentrated, they will negatively impact fish feeding rates, growth rates and reproduction rates, they will lower immune system activity and promote blooms of pathogenic bacteria in the water.

these DOC's can be controlled by water changes, and i recommend maintaining your nitrate levels at less than 10 ppm (the less the better) since doing so will concurrently facilitate a low level of DOC's, something which you cannot test for.

if you are not managing your nitrates and thus your DOC levels, chemical filtration is perhaps the best method for you. carbon filtering removes DOC's via adsorption. as the aquarium water flows through the carbon medium, the Dissolved Organic Compounds come into contact with the surfaces of the carbon granules where they become attached. this is ADsorption --- not ABsorption. some DOC's are adsorbed directly, whereas others combine chemically with already-captured substances. when the surfaces of the carbon become saturated, it stops working and needs to be replaced with new carbon.

one needs to recognize that there are many types of carbon sold for aquarium use but VERY FEW of these are actually capable of adsorption in water. only HIGH QUALITY ACTIVATED GRANULAR carbon which has been degassed in an oxygen oven at temperatures close to 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit is functional --- anything else is worthless. i can recommend Marineland activated granular carbon in this regard though there may be others. degassing enlarges the apparent surface area of each carbon granule, thus greatly increasing the adsorptive capacity.

look for activated carbon which is phosphate free. a great many carbon grades are washed with phosphoric acid in an effort to support the adsorption sites since this is cheaper than degassing. this phosphate will leach into your aquarium water and can reult in a major algae problem.

deep beds of Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) are always more effective than shallow ones of equal area. also, for a given amount of GAC the smaller the granules, the greater the adsorptive capacity. generally, there needs to be 4 to 10 grams of GAC for every gallon of water depending on stocking density. such carbon beds typically last only a month at best and more typically 2-3 weeks since most hobbyists tanks are overstocked.

if your filter uses prepackaged cartridges containing carbon, realize that these cartridges typically contain poor quality carbon and if quality carbon is used, only 20 percent or less of the recommended amounts of GAC is present. you can slit open the cartridge and fill them with more GAC but many pad filter types simply will not hold that much. thus, the carbon in the vast majority of filter pads on the market simply are not functioning. therefor why pay for it.

in a filter, the GAC should always be placed after the mechanical filtering medium otherwise, the particulates in the water will quickly coat the surfaces of the GAC, rendering it useless.

so what's the bottom line? if you're going to use activated carbon, you've got to use QUALITY material, you've got use ENOUGH of it to work and you've got to CHANGE IT often enough to keep it functional. a weekly water change schedule taylored to your bioload will work equally well however and is certainly less expensive.
 
WOW!! Thanks for the detailed response. That is pretty much what I had thought without knowing the exact reasons behind it. I'm very regular as far as tank maintenance goes and have my nitrATES at a fairly stable 5-10 ppm now. So, it does look like if I keep up with that, which I will, carbon is pretty much a waste of money :)

Thanks again!
Yash
 
If you've got multiple corals having chemicall warfare... then that would be the only time I would recomend using carbon. It is true that the water changes will remove the chemicall the corals are releasing, but since this chemicall warfare will go on almost 24/7 it will be nesisary to remove it just as much... Daily water changes on the average marine tank will get real expensive.
 
I don't have any corals yet so I should be able to manage with just the water changes. But I do plan on adding corals down the road once has tank has been up and running for a while, and all the water params stabilized. So I'lll look into adding the carbon at that time. I agree though ... daily water changes will surely add up quick!!
 
AquariaCentral.com