Not trying to get a flame started or anything, but I was just wondering - why exactly does AC edit out the names of big box stores when members post complaints about them?
Is it for legal reasons, or just a courtesy to them?
Because it seems like if it's for legal reasons, a simple "Aquaria Central is not responsible for the content of its pages, opinions belong solely to the individuals posting them" would do the trick.
I just think it's interesting, that's all.
I can definitely see big box stores getting angry when employees divulge company secrets, and perhaps that would be grounds for litigation. But having teenagers say that they suck? People calling their employees incompetent, going on about the terrible living conditions that they have witnessed at their local store? Even if they generalize and say that "all _______s are like this"...why should the company give much of a rat's patootie?
Maybe this is incredibly naive of me, but I would hope that if these big box stores DID see those comments, that they would think to themselves "Hmm, we need to do better."
I know that in many parts of the country, the world's biggest retailer has stopped selling live fish. If that's because 10,000 people said that they suck, that they can't keep a fish alive worth a darn...well, great! (Probably not, probably has everything to do with the bottom line and precious little else, but...)
I mean, I'm just not sure...where does it stop? Many people consider Wardley to be an inferior quality food. It's a "budget" food for sure. If someone says Wardley foods suck, do we need that censored?
What's the difference between saying that and saying, "_____ sucks, every time I buy a fish from there, they die"...?
I am not trying to argue, just would like some clarification. Is it written somewhere what can and can't be said? Are we supposed to just obscure the name of the store for search engine purposes, or bleep out the name so that no one can know what it is?
Is it for legal reasons, or just a courtesy to them?
Because it seems like if it's for legal reasons, a simple "Aquaria Central is not responsible for the content of its pages, opinions belong solely to the individuals posting them" would do the trick.
I just think it's interesting, that's all.
I can definitely see big box stores getting angry when employees divulge company secrets, and perhaps that would be grounds for litigation. But having teenagers say that they suck? People calling their employees incompetent, going on about the terrible living conditions that they have witnessed at their local store? Even if they generalize and say that "all _______s are like this"...why should the company give much of a rat's patootie?
Maybe this is incredibly naive of me, but I would hope that if these big box stores DID see those comments, that they would think to themselves "Hmm, we need to do better."
I know that in many parts of the country, the world's biggest retailer has stopped selling live fish. If that's because 10,000 people said that they suck, that they can't keep a fish alive worth a darn...well, great! (Probably not, probably has everything to do with the bottom line and precious little else, but...)
I mean, I'm just not sure...where does it stop? Many people consider Wardley to be an inferior quality food. It's a "budget" food for sure. If someone says Wardley foods suck, do we need that censored?
What's the difference between saying that and saying, "_____ sucks, every time I buy a fish from there, they die"...?
I am not trying to argue, just would like some clarification. Is it written somewhere what can and can't be said? Are we supposed to just obscure the name of the store for search engine purposes, or bleep out the name so that no one can know what it is?