I just engaged in a wordy debate with a few guys who were insisting that frequent, regular water changes are absolutely necessary...yet could not explain why.
They could not give any specifics on what was being altered by the water change, that could not be done in some other fashion.
There was some vague talk of "replenishing and renewing" and "electrolytes", but of course you don't "replenish" anything with a generic water change. The only thing you're guaranteed to be adding is H2O, which does not age...and "electrolytes" sounds like a question of specific gravity, to be taken care of with sea salt.
The actual reason people used to change water regularly was that they were killing their fish with poorly-managed Under-Gravel Filters, and were fighting the nitrate buildup they were causing.
But that's no longer the case, thanks to deep sand beds, open-celled ceramic foam, planted tanks, et cetera. There are many ways to remove nitrates so efficiently that they can become TOO low.
So what reason is left?
What is the reason to do a water change?
And I mean some measurable, explainable reason. Something you can choose to do under specific conditions. Giving a timespan for doing them without reason is meaningless.
Since water changes place stress on fish and ecosystem, by altering the tank's self-imposed balance of micro-organism density, reducing the amount of nutrients, et cetera, water changes were never anything better than a necessary evil.
Are they STILL a necessary evil, and if so, why?
They could not give any specifics on what was being altered by the water change, that could not be done in some other fashion.
There was some vague talk of "replenishing and renewing" and "electrolytes", but of course you don't "replenish" anything with a generic water change. The only thing you're guaranteed to be adding is H2O, which does not age...and "electrolytes" sounds like a question of specific gravity, to be taken care of with sea salt.
The actual reason people used to change water regularly was that they were killing their fish with poorly-managed Under-Gravel Filters, and were fighting the nitrate buildup they were causing.
But that's no longer the case, thanks to deep sand beds, open-celled ceramic foam, planted tanks, et cetera. There are many ways to remove nitrates so efficiently that they can become TOO low.
So what reason is left?
What is the reason to do a water change?
And I mean some measurable, explainable reason. Something you can choose to do under specific conditions. Giving a timespan for doing them without reason is meaningless.
Since water changes place stress on fish and ecosystem, by altering the tank's self-imposed balance of micro-organism density, reducing the amount of nutrients, et cetera, water changes were never anything better than a necessary evil.
Are they STILL a necessary evil, and if so, why?