Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Usergroup
    AC Members
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Last Activity
    05-29-2011 2:22 AM
    Posts
    7

    My Sump Sketch / Design... Give an opinion please

    Hello everyone!

    I've just registered to your great forum!

    I used to be in the hobby for about 10 years during my early age (12-25) and then for last 13-14 years since I was moving almost on yearly base had to stop... Now I am planning to start allover again with a Discus aquarium of 500 liters (130 US Gallons).

    I will be making my own sump for it, and for that project I have created a layout sketch which you can see here:

    http://www.hirtc.com/HIRTC/sump.jpg

    Question is - What do you think of it?

    Basically the dimensions are: 100cm x 55cm x 45 cm which gives roughly 250liters but I calculate to be using only 150liters of water when the sump is done & filled in cuz of the lower levels in some compartments of the sump (one with bio balls & one with the reversal pump).

    Please note that I'm a bit rusty when it comes to the expressions since I've lost touch with the hobby long time ago & I've forgot so many things. Also so many things are new & cool too me!

    The compartment sizes are not precisely defined on the drawing since I would have to see them in real when the sump aquarium is in front of me so I can mark them with the masking tape prior to compartment dividers are set to place... but in general I believe it will follow this layout.

    1st comp: will have two intakes draining into two filter bags sitting above some bio filter media.
    2nd comp: will be a simple fish & plant refugium (which I plan into dividing into 3 sub parts)
    3rd comp: will be a narrow compartment for few heaters needed to heat up estimated 650 liters of water (I hope to use 3x 200W or even 4x 150W heaters)
    4th comp: will contain few levels of bagged filter media: Peat, Activated Carbon, Gravel, Ceramic Rings, topped with very fine filter mesh (not sure of the expression)
    5th comp: contains a plate with many tiny holes over bio-balls which will cause water dripping over the bio balls (dry / wet system). Low water level due to the short divider between 5th & 6th comp
    6th comp: return tank / comp. - with the water pump positioned near the water level.

    Do you think I am missing something?
    Any comments, critics... are most welcome!

    Regards,
    Misko





  2. #2
    Jedi Master Lil_Stinker's Avatar
    Usergroup
    AC Members
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Last Activity
    07-30-2012 8:34 PM
    Posts
    175
    Seems the water from compartment 1 will fall to refugium, then to the heaters without much interaction..

    Perhaps have the water pass though the wall bottom between 1 & 2
    In My Humble Opinion (IMHO)
    Everyone is Speaking IMHO - Speak your mind !
    Visit and join my web site, your opinion WILL be heard.

    Threads I have started can be found by clicking here



  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Usergroup
    AC Members
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Last Activity
    05-29-2011 2:22 AM
    Posts
    7

    I get it.

    Dear Lil_Stinker,
    Thanks for your input. I will revise the wall structure there & make the small tunnel between comp 1 & 2 (wall touching the bottom & then one touching the top) which will make the refugium having better flow!
    Any other comments?
    M



  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Usergroup
    AC Members
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Last Activity
    05-29-2011 2:22 AM
    Posts
    7
    I am looking @ my sketch again & thinking.
    In case I open the wholes on the bottom of the wall btwn com.1 * com.2 or make double wall so I have the flow from bottom to the top in com.2 - then I risk my fish getting into the hole on the bottom & sticking in there and having no possibility of growing the plants with the bottom.
    Unless I open the hole somewhere like 5-10cm above the bottom & cover it with some kind of mesh which will not allow fish moving in com.1?
    Hmmmm - a bit confused now on what to do.
    M



  5. #5
    Member
    Usergroup
    AC Members
    Real Name
    Mike
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Redmond, Oregon
    Last Activity
    09-13-2013 7:00 PM
    Posts
    57
    Make the first baffle out of a perforated plate, cut down an old under gravel filter or something. It should keep the fish in place and provide for plenty of flow.

    Why do you need ceramic rings and bioballs? Aren't these redundant? I believe the bioballs will be more effective if used in a wet/dry trickle arrangement like you show. Submerged the rings should work better. In a sump you could always add air stones under the ceramic ring media and then do away with the bio balls completely.

    I don't think you are going to have very effective mechanical filtration when it comes to very small particles. Add a whole house canister filter (big blue type) in the return line between the pump and the tank. The sump will be a great prefilter for the cartridge and remove the big stuff allowing a fine filter in the whole house canister with a decent life between cleanings.

    Get rid of the last baffle between the bio balls and pump. What is the sponge going to catch that hasn't been caught by the previous stages of the filter? This will allow you to lower the water level under the bio balls giving you more room for more balls.



  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Usergroup
    AC Members
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Last Activity
    05-29-2011 2:22 AM
    Posts
    7
    http://www.hirtc.com/HIRTC/sump.jpg

    I have updated the sump according to your comments, but I guess I will keep both bio balls & ceramic rings... nobody seems to be able to agree what is more efficient & bio balls are new technology for me so I would like to try them! When I was into aquariums they were not existing in Serbia where I lived back then.

    Let me know if this is how you imagined it?
    Thank you a lot for your comments.
    Misko



  7. #7
    Senior Member fshfanatic's Avatar
    Usergroup
    AC Members
    Real Name
    Mike
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    1,340
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	sump.jpg 
Views:	293 
Size:	293.6 KB 
ID:	176428
    That looks great
    FS Sodium Thiosulfate Crystals ( DIY Dechlor )

    Quote Originally Posted by H2Ogal View Post
    I like happy endings.
    Cigarettes are a lot like Hamsters, Perfectly harmless until you put one in your mouth and light it on fire.
    You cant appreciate heaven until you have fallen through it. - Airborne



  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Usergroup
    AC Members
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Last Activity
    05-29-2011 2:22 AM
    Posts
    7
    Glad you like it

    My new question is - how strong pump should I buy for this setup?
    Considering around 500liters in main tank + 170 liters in the sump (total = 670lit / 175US Gal) - and the fact that I would like to grow Discus in my tank so I need lots of filtration / circulation (with that BLUE filter between sump & tank)???



  9. #9
    Member
    Usergroup
    AC Members
    Real Name
    Mike
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Redmond, Oregon
    Last Activity
    09-13-2013 7:00 PM
    Posts
    57
    My understanding is that the semi-aquas environment (media that is wet but also has contact with air) is the most productive environment for nitrifying bacteria. Hence bio balls when used as they were intended, surrounded by air with water trickling over them is pretty hard to beat for productivity. Ceramic rings work on the principal that they are very porous and have a huge surface area for the bacteria to form on. Since all of the oxygen for the bacteria to live on has to come from the water when the media is fully submerged the oxygen content of the water is the limiting factor for their productivity.

    I have not seen it stated anywhere but my belief, based on simple logic, is that putting air stones under the submerged ceramic media will greatly increase the available oxygen and hence greatly increase the productivity of the bacteria. This is just my theory though. I would loose the gravel and replace it with the more of the more productive ceramic media.

    Another benefit of bioballs is that they greatly increase the surface area of the water that directly comes into contact with the air there by greatly increasing the gas exchange... i.e. more oxygen in the tank water.

    When comparing the surface area of ceramic media to the surface area of bioballs for a given volume of media the ceramic media will have many times the surface area of the bio balls. Hence bioball are much less productive in a fully submerged application. This might lead someone to question: Why not use ceramic media in a semi-aquas application instead of bioballs?

    Bioballs, or any semi-aquas media does suffer one major drawback: When the water stops the bacteria quickly die. Hence your design of using both fully submerged ceramic rings and semi-aquas bioballs sounds like a very good one to me. If (when) you have an incident where the pump stops for what ever reason the bacteria on the bioballs will quickly die off. When the water is resumed the bacteria that is on the ceramic rings will start to re-colonize the bioballs.

    On top of all this... bioballs are fun to play with as a filtration media!

    __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ _________________
    In your current configuration the water flows up through your main media column. You might want to consider swapping the heater compartment with the media compartment which would change the media compartment to a down flow design. My reasoning is simply that the water will hit the filter pad first, which will also be on top and easily removed for cleaning. This will keep debris from collecting in the bio media... and it is best to clean the biomedia as seldom as possible.

    The trade off is that the up flow design is conducive to carrying the air bubbles up through the bio media. Depending on your flow rate and chamber size you might simply wash the air bubbles through the heater compartment when these two chambers are swapped. But if the flow rate doesn't over come the rising air bubbles you will have the water flow opposing the air flow creating longer a contact time and better gas exchange.



    __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ _________________


    One of the nice features of a sump is that the level of water in the tank remains constant with most overflow designs. The down side to this is the level of water in the sump changes considerably faster do to evaporation than one might expect. The collection basing in my sump is the entire bottom of the sump (no baffles) and I will loos about an inch of water a day in my sump do to evaporation.

    In your design the collection basin is the last compartment where the pump sits. This appears to me to be a relatively small volume. If you remove the last baffle separating the pump compartment from the bioball chamber it would appear to me that you would effectively double the volume of the collection basin without changing the performance in anyway with the benefit of reducing the effect of evaporation on water level in the collection basin.

    I think you misunderstood my recommendation, I recommend you remove the last baffle all together not just the sponge.

    Your second to last baffle, the one retaining the bioballs, only serves the purpose of making it easier to access the pump. This is a very valid purpose but the positioning of this baffle should be placed such that you can easily remove the pump but at the same time maximize the volume of the bioball chamber.


    To sum it up: in my opinion I think you have a very nice design.
    Last edited by oughtsix; 05-27-2011 at 12:14 PM.



  10. #10
    Junior Member
    Usergroup
    AC Members
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Last Activity
    05-29-2011 2:22 AM
    Posts
    7
    This in regard with the previous Q dealing with the water pump I was thinking of some pump that can get about 2000-2500L turn over in an hour. Do you think that's enough? That will give me aprox. 3 circulations through filter, and considering it's open type - I believe it's enough. What do you think?

    Dear oughtsix - let me reply to your post a bit later. Thanks for the time taken to explain further. I feel good to know it's wise to keep both bio balls & ceramic rings
    I will explain also the last part dealing with the last two comp. a bit later.

    Regards,
    Milos
    Last edited by Milos; 05-27-2011 at 12:09 PM.



Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. New sump design
    By noskimmer in forum Marine Equipment, Products, & DIY
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 09-09-2010, 7:09 AM
  2. give me your opinion
    By suburbsteve219 in forum General Freshwater
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-10-2009, 1:13 AM
  3. wet/dry sump design
    By tankanator in forum Marine Fish Only (FO) / Fish Only With Live Rock (FOWLR)
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 04-08-2007, 9:14 AM
  4. my sump design???
    By Leo1 in forum Marine Equipment, Products, & DIY
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 03-31-2007, 9:20 PM
  5. sump design
    By slipknottin in forum Freshwater Equipment and DIY Archives
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-08-2002, 10:45 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •