Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Can't have too many Tiger Barbs... maxthedog123's Avatar
    Usergroup
    AC Members
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Last Activity
    12-21-2012 10:01 AM
    Posts
    604

    Question about actinic lighting

    I have a question about actinic lights in a planted tank. I know actinic lights don't help the plants out, but what effect does it have on possible algae growth and total wattage?

    Let me explain. I am setting up my 5th aquarium. Two existing tanks are semi-low tech - about 1wpg of low output T5 with filters. The other two tanks are Walstad setups with soil substrate and no filtration. The latest setup is a 46 bowfront I acquired and I am planning on another Walstad type setup. The light fixture I ended up with is a 2x21w low output T5, but it is a saltwater fixture so it came with one actinic bulb. I have plenty of replacement bulbs that can go in there in the 6500K-10000K range if I want to.

    What I am curious about is this - with one bulb in the spectrum for plant growth, what effect will the actinic bulb have? The color of the bulb - very blue - provides some cool colors. If the actinic bulb isn't doing anything for the plants, will in encourage algae growth, or is the color temp of the bulb out of the range that even matters in freshwater? In other words, does it even count in the light intensity/wattage equation or is it just blue eye candy?

    Just curious if anyone has an opinion or experience with an actinic bulb over a freshwater planted tank.
    55g: 5 denisonii barbs, 18 neons, 1 SAE, 1 BN Pleco, 2 Columbian Tetras
    46g bow: stocking!!!
    30g upper: 12 cherry barbs, 2 bolivian rams, 2 black tetras, 1 BN pleco
    30g
    lower: EMPTY
    20g: 1 black neon, 2 cardinal tetras, 3 guppies 10g: 1 blue gourami, 6 white clouds, shrimp
    All tanks planted. 46g, 20g and 10g Walstad style aquariums





  2. #2
    Plants need meat too jpappy789's Avatar
    Usergroup
    AC Members
    Real Name
    Josh
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Gainesville, FL
    Posts
    26,000
    I believe most actinics have really low PAR ratings...so they're essentially useless for plants.

    I've heard that they cause algae growth, but have yet see any scientific proof that the actinics were the cause and it wasn't just a coincidence.
    20 gallon long planted
    My carnivorous plants

    Quote Originally Posted by Rbishop View Post
    I like the movie Goonies...pretty sure it was a historical documentary....



  3. #3
    Senior Member constevens's Avatar
    Usergroup
    AC Members
    Real Name
    Conway
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Colorado
    Last Activity
    02-27-2014 9:31 AM
    Posts
    428
    Wont even count for anything in the light usage for the tank. Just "Eye candy" Its possible it could help induce algae. BUT I think there are other things that cause algae issues long before a actinic light would. Poor water conditions or lacking specific nutrients being first on the list.



  4. #4
    Banned
    Usergroup
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    5,639
    Blue actinic lighting is in the wavelength range of about 420nm-460nm. PAR, the spectrum that plants actually use is approximately 400nm-700nm with distinct peaks in activity in the mid to upper 400's and the mid to upper 600's. I would love to hear a logical explanation why actinic lighting is useless for plants. It isn't of course, but I enjoy watching folks try to explain why it is. For a real treat, try growing plants under just blue actinic and just under a red bulb in the 680 nm range and observe the results. OK, nobody here's going to get off their soapbox long enough to actually do it, but what you'll find is that plants will develop somewhat normally under the blue, although the internodal distance will be greatly decreased, essentially dwarfing the plant. It will not flower normally however. Under just the red the plants will elongate so rapidly they won't be able to support themselves, and will not develop in any way remotely resembling normal.
    Last edited by SubRosa; 03-02-2012 at 10:26 PM.



  5. #5
    Senior Member aXio's Avatar
    Usergroup
    AC Members
    Real Name
    Jakub
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Woodstock, GA
    Last Activity
    01-30-2013 11:45 PM
    Posts
    474
    I'm with subrosa on this. I think it will definitely affect your you plants. I don't they will be the cause of excess algae but plants do make use of that spectrum some what.



  6. #6
    Sea Bunny Khemul's Avatar
    Usergroup
    AC Members
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    South Florida
    Last Activity
    04-07-2014 5:17 AM
    Posts
    1,617
    ^ yep

    Algae isn't caused by light. It is caused by nutrients in the water. The connection people often make is because algae often isn't as picky and so can handle higher intensity then plants (hence why having too much light can encourage algae).

    The actinic is perfectly fine for the plants and it won't cause algae.


    And now I'm tempted to throw some actinic bulbs (or maybe something very high in kelvin) into the fixtures over my planted tank. I actually like the sound of dwarf plants, especially now that my tank has been taken over by tall plants that race to the surface then branch all over the place.
    “Light thinks it travels faster than anything but it is wrong. No matter how fast light travels, it finds the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it.”
    - Terry Pratchett

    Freshwater - 120g, 75g, 28g.
    Saltwater - 40B



  7. #7
    Senior Member ROYWS3's Avatar
    Usergroup
    AC Members
    Real Name
    Roy
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    North-Central PA
    Last Activity
    Yesterday 8:28 PM
    Posts
    899
    I've got this fixture on my two 20H tanks: http://www.aquatraders.com/24-inch-2...re-p/52121.htm

    It's got a 12k lamp and an Actinic lamp and my plants grow great! see this thread: http://www.aquariacentral.com/forums...20H&highlight=
    the pics aren't great and I do get some algae (for reasons other than my lighting - my kids feed the tanks).

    I have definitely noticed that the nodes on my bunch plants are much closer than if I were using strictly "daylight" (5K to 67K) lamps.

    I've got no real empirical evidence for this but I can see the differences

    Roy



  8. #8
    Can't have too many Tiger Barbs... maxthedog123's Avatar
    Usergroup
    AC Members
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Last Activity
    12-21-2012 10:01 AM
    Posts
    604
    I decided to go with 10000K and 6700K bulbs due mainly to how I like the light to look. This was an interesting however. Obviously some strong opinions.
    55g: 5 denisonii barbs, 18 neons, 1 SAE, 1 BN Pleco, 2 Columbian Tetras
    46g bow: stocking!!!
    30g upper: 12 cherry barbs, 2 bolivian rams, 2 black tetras, 1 BN pleco
    30g
    lower: EMPTY
    20g: 1 black neon, 2 cardinal tetras, 3 guppies 10g: 1 blue gourami, 6 white clouds, shrimp
    All tanks planted. 46g, 20g and 10g Walstad style aquariums



  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Usergroup
    AC Members
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Last Activity
    Today 9:24 AM
    Posts
    513
    Subrosa hit the nail on the head.

    1. Actinic lighting matches the peak absorbancy spectrum of chlorophyll a. This pigment is found in all photosynthetic organisms from plants to algae. It will grow plants without a doubt. Modern hydroponic LED lights use blue-violet and Red lights to achieve best growth with minimal waste (there is no reason to put green light in a plant growth lamp).

    2. Actinic lights have low measured PAR values because the PAR meter sensors (Apogee in particular) do not have a good response below 470 nm. At 420 nm only 40% of the light emitted is actually detected by the meter. If you have a lamp that has most of it's energy below 450 nm and peaks at 420 nm it will always read low even though the amount of light energy released is the same as a daylight lamp.

    3. Actinic light is near the nonvisible range of the EM spectrum and looks dim to the human eye. This is probably how the "not bright enough" rumor got started. The lamp is producing plenty of light that plants can use.

    Plants do need to balance blue and red light. In a 6700K or 10K lamp there is a good balance of blue and red. There is also about a third of the light in the green wavelengths that is useless except to make the tank look pretty to the eye. Although an actinic will grow plants it really needs to be balanced with a second lamp that has more red in it for the best results.

    Andy



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. actinic lighting
    By DiscusAl in forum Freshwater Newbie Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-25-2010, 8:01 PM
  2. Lighting Question...Actinic -vs- Daylight
    By TetraFreak in forum Planted Aquariums
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-08-2006, 9:02 PM
  3. lighting question: Actinic counts towards wpg?
    By Aristotle in forum General Marine / Newbie
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-12-2005, 10:39 PM
  4. Actinic lighting
    By SpankyPlants in forum Planted Aquariums
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-29-2004, 9:57 AM
  5. Actinic Lighting!
    By JamisonBWolsh in forum General Freshwater
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 11-29-2002, 10:56 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •