How so? This is a case FOR luckydud, not in the defense of Opi. I've expressed my concerns for her today but I'm not at all confident with a vote or really even naming her as a suspect atm.
Just because I named you, doesn't make me evil :headshake2:
Mafia #47 "Ghost Hunters"
- Thread starter Lady G
- Start date
How so? This is a case FOR luckydud, not in the defense of Opi. I've expressed my concerns for her today but I'm not at all confident with a vote or really even naming her as a suspect atm.
Just because I named you, doesn't make me evil :headshake2:
Why? Just out of curiosity? What part of my logic doesn't make sense? I'm open to improving my theory....Wouldn't it make sense to make you leaning towards innocent given that a) I think Rich is evil b) I don't think evils voted the same on the first night and c) I think lucky is the new recruit?
I very much disagree (and not just because I voted for DD :silly.
If I were a "mafia" (or troubled soul? whatever...) I would keep DD in as long as poll. From my limited game play experience and what people have said, DD is often the victim of much suspicion...perhaps because she plays so well. Why would the "mafia" eliminate someone who can easily be used as a distraction from themselves? They wouldn't they would keep DD in as long as possible knowing that she will always draw some of the pressure off them and on to her. If I were a "mafia", I would take out the people who like to ask a lot of questions and contribute good theories. No offense to DD, but I don't see this as much in her. I think her play style is more a long the lines of being unreadable.
So, my new approach will be to focus on the people who didn't vote for DD, but voted on someone who was a contributor.
so in other words - to completely discount all who voted for DD, thus giving them a free pass....even the scum that was in the mix, Opi included.
"Declaring me innocent" and "me leaning towards innocent" are two very different things and I feel uncomfortable with it - like you are trying to draw attention to me......sorry if I hit a soft spot. I certainly like the fact that I am not at the top of your list but your use of words is certainly concerning........and worth watching - closely.
It may have been a case for Lucky but it was very defending of Opi, who is on my suspect list....maybe i interpretted your post wrong, but that how i sees it.
:::sigh::: I said "focus on"...that does not imply any free passes whatsoever.
Are you trying to make me suspicious of you, now? LOL....Because its working. You are really unwilling to let this go, and it's clear that you are now seeing me as an easy target to point people towards, you and Lucky start a train and get me voted off so the evils are safe for another day.
Perhaps its a Noods & Lucky team. And Rich is just a suspicious character???:huh:
Hmmm....
Sorry, I had meant leaning (heavily...though....given my old theory) towards innocent. So...you were the only one that I had suggested/called innocent thus far is what I meant (to me, its really all the same...both mean that you are at the bottom of my list). But not 100%...(and definitely not any longer).
My apologies, I didn't mean to be confusing. I really need to wait til I have free time to respond to these things instead of doing it on the fly.
Sorry for the long post but once you get a hold of something its hard to let go. I know not all of these players can be evil but it gives me a suspect list and a way to watch from day to day.
I am going to try to keep the players in their own section so this is not chronologically correct.
I hate seeing this, then afterwards he doesn't vote Jpap. He decides Jpap is more likely to be innocent. See below
Is any vote worthless? Did you mean you didn't want to be 1st on someone? Was it you didn't want to be 1st or you didn't want to be alone and have to move?
Here she won't vote DD and won't vote Lucky because she thinks she will be alone there so she jumps on the mini train of John hoping that others follow? Doesn't matter which innocent goes home huh? Not saying JL is innocent but having you as a suspect makes him innocent per diem.
Distancing?
It has been proven and admitted by Jpap at a later date he was wrong about the timing.
Now Noodles is willing to jump to Opi. Really starting to look like Noodles will jump anywhere that will take out somebody, except DD.
here she admits to vote for anyone even DD but still doesn't vote DD
never like seeing that stated on Day 1
Here Jpap rips Opi for her post then in the same post admits he had the timing wrong in answer to my post.
A second time Fire says Jpap is innocent.
Did Jpap know DD was going to show innocent and therefore hope we think he must also be innocent?
seriously Ogre the best reason? want to explain to us why this overruled any other reasons? Then you go from a lone vote on Rickets to Noods. Could be distancing here also.
Basically saying he thinks DD is innocent
Now saying Noods is innocent.
I'm sure you will be.
Woah another innocent claim? There can't be that many evils.
Yeah I was on DD, I posted on DD so I expect to be looked at. But I don't trust you at all Noods,especially with how you were all over the place willing to hide everywhere and anywhere except onto DD whom you said you would vote for. I think you look more suspicious than anyone that was on DD at the time except maybe Fire but only because you posted more then her.
I tried to keep a level post but there was way to much to move around. I hope you guys can follow it.
Of the ones I posted about I'd have to say Noods, Fire, Lucky are the top 3 suspects. Only 2 could have been team mates at the time. I'd lean towards Noods and Lucky as the starting team though.
Jpap drops down but not out. I could see that he could be kicking bushes and not attacking but I don't like some of his posts.
Ogre I'd like to hear more from. I don't like single votes but I can relate to a day 1 single. Just not after stating you don't like day 1 singles then moving to another day 1 single.
I am going to try to keep the players in their own section so this is not chronologically correct.
I hate seeing this, then afterwards he doesn't vote Jpap. He decides Jpap is more likely to be innocent. See below
Is any vote worthless? Did you mean you didn't want to be 1st on someone? Was it you didn't want to be 1st or you didn't want to be alone and have to move?
Here she won't vote DD and won't vote Lucky because she thinks she will be alone there so she jumps on the mini train of John hoping that others follow? Doesn't matter which innocent goes home huh? Not saying JL is innocent but having you as a suspect makes him innocent per diem.
Distancing?
It has been proven and admitted by Jpap at a later date he was wrong about the timing.
Now Noodles is willing to jump to Opi. Really starting to look like Noodles will jump anywhere that will take out somebody, except DD.
here she admits to vote for anyone even DD but still doesn't vote DD
never like seeing that stated on Day 1
I understand the timing issue, and I probably should have thought about that more in depth. 4 minutes... it's hard to say whether you were typing at the same time Ice posted.
I only said it's "mafia-like" following because it seemed to me as you waited for someone else to commit to the vote even though you said quite a bit that DD was your top suspect and probable vote getter. Sort of a "look at them, not me. I didn't start it!" sort of thing. You had DD as pretty much a done vote unless she responded but it looked like you decided that if other people would vote for her, you might as well get it in, even if her response later was good enough to make you switch thoughts.
Kind of weak reasoning but it's all I got at this point.
Sorry to hear this Noods
I missed that too. Dang. I feel really iffy about my vote but my other suspects at the moment are rickets and DD. Another lone vote and a train, not an ideal situation to switch votes.
Your question to noodles brings up another point of mine. Noodles was one to voice her opinions on me once votes were first thrown out, then she kind of is suspicious of Opi for what I said...but she admits to a random-ish vote on JL...odd.
Fire, I'm interested in why you think I'm innocent (I know, before I was wondering why I was so suspicious to everyone else...) I only ask because you flat out say it, rather than lean me a certain way. Bold statement this early.
Also, could you give a post numbers of the stuff you referenced?
Here Jpap rips Opi for her post then in the same post admits he had the timing wrong in answer to my post.
A second time Fire says Jpap is innocent.
Did Jpap know DD was going to show innocent and therefore hope we think he must also be innocent?
seriously Ogre the best reason? want to explain to us why this overruled any other reasons? Then you go from a lone vote on Rickets to Noods. Could be distancing here also.
Basically saying he thinks DD is innocent
Now saying Noods is innocent.
I'm sure you will be.
Woah another innocent claim? There can't be that many evils.
Yeah I was on DD, I posted on DD so I expect to be looked at. But I don't trust you at all Noods,especially with how you were all over the place willing to hide everywhere and anywhere except onto DD whom you said you would vote for. I think you look more suspicious than anyone that was on DD at the time except maybe Fire but only because you posted more then her.
I tried to keep a level post but there was way to much to move around. I hope you guys can follow it.
Of the ones I posted about I'd have to say Noods, Fire, Lucky are the top 3 suspects. Only 2 could have been team mates at the time. I'd lean towards Noods and Lucky as the starting team though.
Jpap drops down but not out. I could see that he could be kicking bushes and not attacking but I don't like some of his posts.
Ogre I'd like to hear more from. I don't like single votes but I can relate to a day 1 single. Just not after stating you don't like day 1 singles then moving to another day 1 single.
