because you are my top suspect, you have done nothing to even try to prove your innocence, until i have a better lynch candidate my vote stays on you.
Mafia 9: The Bloody Coup
- Thread starter IceH2O
- Start date
because you are my top suspect, you have done nothing to even try to prove your innocence, until i have a better lynch candidate my vote stays on you.
I show 14 of 20 voting, with 4 hrs left.
Two folks with 3 votes each.
Unless there is a massive shift towards 12 or 13 folks towards the same individual, there is little unity, if you count in a few rebels trying to hide.
Two folks with 3 votes each.
Unless there is a massive shift towards 12 or 13 folks towards the same individual, there is little unity, if you count in a few rebels trying to hide.
Ok, gone through everything....man that gets tedious:drool: anyway I have found something I personaly find interesting, has anyone else noticed (or am I just up to late) there seems to be an "odd" connection between Jo and Jpap?
First of Jo's very first post #39 he Bolds (not just throws out the name) to Lynch Jpap.
Jpap Post #59 comes back (reasonably so) saying Kind of odd reasoning in my opinion.
Jo post #82 comes back and retracts his vote saying to Jpapk, jpap like i said, it was just to throw a vote out there.
To be honest i was hoping to get some early train followers.... but my reasoning wasnt really good enough to get anyone to bite it appears.
Ok, this is all good also, explains a little why he did what he did...but did we need a "train" at this point?
Now these post are not all that telling but as the game goes on,
Post #151, Jpap starts with top person on his list is Jo, then at the end of the post he changes (after listing some of DC's post) which really contain nothing "suspicious" IMO says he is NOW his top choice..b/c he doesn't have a list. At this point not many people have posted any kind of list (a couple but not many). Its not the fact that he doesn't have a list, it's the fact that he said he would review posts and come up with one. 20 minutes later he still didn't. And now a day later he doesn't. And with a vote to joander, with no indepth reasoning?
Post #152, Jo comes in and says how no matter what he does people think he's wrong and explains again his reason for voting jpap.
Post # 153, Jpap comes back and says: see your point joander. I think that as of right now you are suspicious mostly because no one else has done anything...He was. No one else had done anything
So at this point we have Jo voting Jpap, Jpap naming Jo as top but then saying DC is his top, to Jpap "seeing Jo's point" in voting for him early on.
Post #154 Jo comes back after Jpap posting:well someone has to get the game moving =) DC is a better suspect IMO. I understood his explanation of why he voted for me
it seems the first day the game starts (real life not game days) that no one says much of anything, just all useless posts hoping that someone will screw up. And in my opinion it is wasted time, especially if no one screws up. We spend so much time looking for a "newbie mistake" but when there's even the slightest chance of one happening, we relentlessly jump on the person who "screwed up" and lynch them out of the town.
Now Jo is not a newbie and he is the only one to really be jumped on so that theory kinda backfires at him.
Then we get to post #175..Jo is trying to defend himself again and voting KOTD now saying: i vote to lynch KOTD
for doing exactly what i wanted him to, and falling into the trap of early lynchers, and train jumpers.
Now unless I missed something KOTD simply added a list of 2 people, didn't vote for anyone or "jump" on a train. If I'm wrong here please correct me. I just didn't see a train jump or early lyncher.
Of coarse KOTD comes back saying Jo just moved to top of his list Post#179
Interestingly here comes Jpap post #180 to "defend" Jo again saying "I wouldn't move Jo up on my list yet"
I may be crazy here, but it seems a pattern is forming between Jo & Jpap?
When KOTD comes back with why he feels this way about Jo, Jpap then says "I get your reasoning" This was much later. Isn't it suspicious that jo got so defensive when there was no vote for him??? He was only on lists at the time...
Then post #196 Jpap finally asks Jo for his reason to vote KOTD although previously in post #183 he "agrees with Jo and has KOTD on his "watch list" KOTD is on my watch list, along with MANY other players for being a good player capable of deceiving the whole country
Post #204 Jpap, kinda came out of nowhere it states:I guess I'm just an agreeable person. What else did you want me to say? Why should I butt heads with people I agree with?
It's early and I'm taking everyone's thoughts into consideration. I have put my own opinions in their too. I just agreed with KOTDs point about jo being all fussy when nobody voted for him. He made a good point IMO
Where exactly are your opinions Jpap..you are just following after Jo then KOTD, aside from the post about DC? Please point me in the direction where YOU have made your OWN opinion?
In the end they have both voted for someone different Jo/KOTD and Jpap/DC.
Now maybe I AM reading to much into things here but these two seem to be pretty side by side here on posting and make me very uncomfortable. If anyone thinks I'm wrong please let me know I don't want to throw out false accusations but this was something I noticed and wondered if anyone else found it to be as "odd" as I have?
I think you are wrong...
Ok, I want to make this clear on why I am suspicious of DC. He says something to the matter of "I am going to review posts and probably come up with a bad list." He posts 10 minutes later...no substance. 10 minutes later...no substance. Than nothing until today, following DD with a vote for jo. He doesn't even acknowledge my vote for him, no explanation. This still concerns me. I think either he is not reading posts (which is suspicious) or he doesn't want to draw attention to himself. I am sticking to my vote for now...I like your thinking Lady G, which is why I have you high on my list as a CC, but please look closer...
Last edited:
Dangerdoll
Global Moderator
you would think it makes no sense, open your mind Jo, what works for me doesn't necessarily have to work for you. AND you are doing nothing to insist that my voting is incorrect as you are innocent besides telling me my votes makes no sense.
Anyone find it interesting after the whole jpappy vs. joander thing they have both settled to vote on DC together?
Dangerdoll
Global Moderator
sorry, missed that rb..... I thought that DC had voted Jo after Jo had voted for him.... and I didn't see that drunk post until after I had posted that so I retract that statement but I do not retract my vote.
