Zombies -- Mafia #11

JL said that Jpap I said:

LG- as pointed out by Mad, hypocrisy in her posts. Baiting on disagreements.

Yes, according to Mad...not DC, he did nothing but chime in once mad made a comment. Which I'm sorry was simply a post taken wrong.
 
So we lose those 3 that decided it was boring to be a townie plus MOST LIKELY lynch an innocent and lose an innocent to a turn.

So its better to lose 5 innocents in one night?

If I could have voted for KOTD and GUPPY along with Charlie I would have done it.

Well it looks to me like you can't wait to chalk up 5 and 6 tomorrow as it is, but I guess that's just fine by you guys...Having any cravings for brains lately?
 
Yes, according to Mad...not DC, he did nothing but chime in once mad made a comment. Which I'm sorry was simply a post taken wrong.

Well I'm on the chopping block now for the same reason and I understand it, but I don't expect an apology to stop anyone from going forward with a vote for me.
 
Ok Ice. I see where I got confused. Either way he is following people's ideas as a reason to make a vote for someone that wasn't on the chopping block yet...

LG, I put your name out there to see how you'd react. I found it odd that since then you've been kind of bouncing around making some contradictory posts, as Ice has mentioned. You've also been defensive in a stand-offish way. I dunno if you're just scouting the field but you make it hard to tell who you're with or against. Due to this fact and your ability to play a convincing good guy while being a villain, I now feel comfortable leaving my vote on you.

I wasn't bouncing around because you put my name out there. In fact I thought so little of I said nothing. Oh my and I "defended" myself, WELL I have ppl saying they think I'm a **** zombie...hell ya I'm going to "defend" myself it you want to call it that, the only thing I have done was answer to post that said things about me, I corrected my thoughts because they were misunderstood, and yes I have "looked" at many ppl, like I said I think it is way better to suspect many and decide between them as pick one person, put blinders on and look no further.
 
I have to run for now, will be back in a while to look through and post some thoughts.
 
Nope, I assumed those that didn't vote were innocent and busy and probably decided another game will come up, so why not take a break instead of playing a "boring innocent" rather than a power role or evil....
funny, DC, I would have expected another defense, something other than admitting you "assumed" in this game. Is this what you would have done if you got an innocent role?

I would have never thought Charlie would take that kind of attitude with the game, and thought for sure he would vote. I wasn't sold on him being innocent because of his not being here as usual but I wasn't sold on him being guilty either. I'm thinking something came up. I mean, why would anyone sign up for the game and then just bail because they don't like their role, seems selfish if you ask me. We are all supporting each other to keep the town afloat and I for one would expect each person who claims they are gonna play, to play, whether they agree with the role they've been given or not.
 
*game off*
guys, I'm off to bed, seems I am on the brink of a cold with a sore throat and a clouding headache.... wanna get some rest before it kicks in and maybe I can run it out of my system. Nite nite townies and keep strong.
*game on*
 
funny, DC, I would have expected another defense, something other than admitting you "assumed" in this game. Is this what you would have done if you got an innocent role?

I would have never thought Charlie would take that kind of attitude with the game, and thought for sure he would vote. I wasn't sold on him being innocent because of his not being here as usual but I wasn't sold on him being guilty either. I'm thinking something came up. I mean, why would anyone sign up for the game and then just bail because they don't like their role, seems selfish if you ask me. We are all supporting each other to keep the town afloat and I for one would expect each person who claims they are gonna play, to play, whether they agree with the role they've been given or not.

I didn't say I agreed with it or I thought it wasn't selfish, but it's what runs through my mind when people sign up and get eliminated for not voting. In both games where the rule was instituted all of those that died off were innocent. Maybe people have taken the games for granted. It's not right if they have, but either way Iwanted to focus on the game at hand and get some ideas of people's voting patterns by seeing who they chose. Last game it was just fine for people to go after those voting for those who were about to die and we ended up winning quickly. Why has this changed? Why are we so happy to hand the zombies good, experienced players? I think these are important questions we should be asking as well.
 
First off, I really thought I was dead and saw no way for me to not be lynched when I was last online. I felt that my response would go on deaf ears.

I am surprised to find that I am still alive and that Charlie_Stubbs was lynched. I did not see it coming.

I should thank Ice for the swing vote and jpappy and Swayde for their late day moves. Which seems odd, they were voting for each other and then both went to Charlie. Who was bound to die anyway with a no vote, if he failed to vote.

Ok, I have changed my mind. Charlies' absence has really got me worried. 2 out of his 4 posts are "jokes" and one other one is unrelated to the game...I think he would have voted by now if he had nothing to hide.

I retract my bote on Swayde and I vote to lynch Charlie

I will decide whether this vote will stick depending on his reaction.

Above jpappy even knows that CS has not voted, but still votes for him.



Kind of a wasted vote. If he doesn't show in the next hour he dies anyway.

DC points this out!

So looking at voting I see revenge votes from

JL/ewurm

Jpap/Sway

JL leading with 3 and Ogre and LG right behind with 2

Then a bunch of 1 votes.

I really wish JL would be more of a help on day 1 as I'm not really happy with this vote. Not that anyone is screaming Zombie. My other choice would be Ogre.

I'll have to pull the post but I think it was Ogres where someone lists who they think are innocents.

How can anyone get that feeling already?

I'm sitting here thinking I don't really like who I'm in company with on JL and then looking at other names and not really comfortable switching because I'm not satisfied with the people on them either.

I'm thinking the only way you can feel comfortable about someone is to know already they are innocent..

I'm going back to find that post then I think I'm voting that way because I think its Ogre and he was one of my higher suspects, though I was hoping I was wrong.

I thought I had more votes on me at this time. Also I did not revenage vote anyone. I am not sure who was on me at that time, but I know it was not CS, because he did not vote, so whose company on me did you not like and why did you not vote for them?

Wow DC scary!

We can't really let that be the tell all of a vote or not. What if he is evil and planned on a thought like that? Then he skates by because its a wasted vote. He has 2 votes on him. 1 more ties him with JL or someone could jump off JL and jump on Charlie.

I don't think there are any wasted votes this game, well not the 1st night. After that I think it goes back to no post/vote.

Now back to my search.

Here he talks about this whole wasted vote thing, because he was going to die an untimely death, but it could be a trick od some sort. I am not even sure of the logic, but at this point Ice seems to think that voting for CS would be bad.

I can see it going both ways here. If Charlie doesn't come back and post a vote then yeah, he's going to die and the vote would be wasted. Or, it could be a safe vote because odds are we're going to take out a townie tonight with our lynch, there are only 2 out of 15 players that are evil. Heck the odds are more likely of us lynching a power role than it is to hit a zombie *cringes* However, it's not like Charlie to not show up and cast a vote and he really does look quite suspicious so far. There's been no weasle kicking and no early vote to get reactions and I have been very tempted to vote for himself several times today.

The more I think about it, the more I actually agree with a vote on Charlie.

I retract my vote on Jpappy and vote to lynch Charlie.

Here Swayde votes for CS, also knowing that he might be dying for not voting.

Ok I thought it was worded differently and I kind of agree with Ogres top 3 but not DD. I didn't really think DC until his last post coupled with the others. Looks like he is trying to protect Charlie by buying him another day.

I'm going to jump off JL, and go back to Charlie since DC has no following. Might as well get 1 zombie tonight.

I retract my vote on JL and vote to lynch Charlie

Here Ice goes against what he posted before and votes to lynch a person that has a high chance of not posting, I think there is less than 90 minutes left.

If any of these non-posters would have came in at the last 2 hours and voted, they would have been lynched the next day. I am sure they know and understood. Maybe they did not want to play because they did not have a power role or were not a zombie. Who knows.

Like I posted before, I really thought I was dead and am very very suprised to be around for day two.

Based on what is posted above, my top three are:

jpappy789
Swayde
IceH2O

While they kept me in the game for another day, they also conducted a late in the day swing for a player that was most likely going to die for not voting. Even thou other players had not voted, they focused on CS. I am grateful to them for keeping me in the game, but I am not happy that they lynched an innocent and voted for someone that was going to be killed anyway.

I vote to lynch IceH2O

He went away from his own logic. Mostly in belief that DC is a zombie. I really do not see the case against DC and would like to see his.
 
AquariaCentral.com