Zombies -- Mafia #11

[jpappy789]

Yeah Lg of course that's going through their head but I meant what type of strategy...low posters who would be suspected to be turned or vocal players who wouldn't be suspected?

But like I said it's not really important anymore...

I don't know how we can use this to our advantage at all. My take is that it was a rule to make sure that a lynching happens everynight. If we think that the second vote getter is a zombie then why not vote for them in the first place???

 

[jpappy789]

Plus we don't know who the doc is protecting...

 

[Lady G]

Oh Mad you entertain me so well, with your attempts to make things look more than what they are.

As promised, here's some of the quotes I've found that seem to link DD with Lady G


In this post DD claims that she thinks Lady G is innocent, because DD can 'tell' when LG plays the bad guy. WRONG! If you don't believe me, go back and read the vamp game again.

There was a post exchange between DD and LG, where LG (as scum) went after Z and DD based on some of their posts around the time Mee-mee was lynched. DD got a little defensive and tried to flip Lady G's comments back to her. Lady G then gave it to DD with both barrels and flipped everything back harder. DD then apologized to LG for the way she seemed to come across so hard on LG.

Lady G had just dumped a 5 gallon bucket of scum on DD's head, and DD was apologizing to her....It was brilliant. DD didn't have a clue that LG was scum. The only way that she got caught was because she had to rally around rb when he was 'outed'.

So after all that, I don't believe that DD has as good of an ability to read LG as she claims she does...
This is good against disputing DD's post I agree, so you are starting out well
Here's a quote where Lady G seems to be whispering that DD is probably innocent, (and maybe Mad is scum). Now everyone knows that in the game of mafia, all is not what is seems to be. But why point out that last game DD seemed scummy but she really wasn't, and Mad didn't, but he really was?
Is she implying that if DD looks scummy she's probably not...if Mad looks like a townie he's probably not?
Here is where you went wrong though..I in no way implied that you are evil and DD innocent, I was making my point as to why I would be taking another look at Orges evilness. Because ready for this...last game I had ppl evil that wasn't and innocent that wasn't. It's that simple, had no meaning that DD is guilty/innocent or you were guilty/innocent. It just happens to me you two I had figured completely opposites last game and I was looking at the things Orge has posted since the Coler outburst and it could be taken different then the way I saw it the first day. In this game if you haven't noticed I whisper nothing I SHOUT it and I let it be known...no whispering coming from me
Am I the only one who notices that LG likes to give just that little extra bit of information at times?
All I can say to that is LOL..no I think you are just looking to hard to find stuff Mad.

Once again, last game DD looked scummy, but wasnt. Mad looked innocent, but was scum...
Ummm yep... I said it again, and again I was getting ready to let my guard down a little toward DC and letting everyone know why, nothing else to it just a reason why I am re looking at a couple of ppl I had come down hard on.
Here DD responds to Lady G's post from above regarding the fact that Ogre referred to LG's case against him as weak. DD volunteers to help LG, by going back and digging some info up on Ogre.
Ok, now you are really looking to hard for something that is not there..she didn't at all mention she was going to help me, the digging she was refuring to was something he said about her, had nothing to do with me. Why don't you re read the post you quoted Mad.
Finally, after Ogre mentions a link between DD and LG, I agree that I also had seen the link. DD responds with this...claims that she is innocent AND LG is innocent. Now how would she know that?


The can deny all they want...the link is there.

Well Mad, the way you come across with this you really think you have something here don't ya. Well I'm sorry to tell you how very wrong you are with this, and because you just proved to me you are trying to look for things that are not there (I believe the bad do that) welcome to my list.

Not because you are coming after me..you have been after me for a while, if that was the reason I would of named you a long time ago.

So you just helped me out I must thank you for that Mad, I was looking for my replacements for Orge or DC, been waiting to see what comes up since I took my "blinders" off and WOW it didn't take long...now go on and say how I'm "flinging" scum, because my friend I am flinging you and I believe you are scum. And there is no "hidden" meaning or "whispering" here I am FLAT OUT saying I believe you to be ZOMBIE.

 

[Lady G]

Yeah Lg of course that's going through their head but I meant what type of strategy...low posters who would be suspected to be turned or vocal players who wouldn't be suspected?
Yes, I knew what you meant Jp, I was just being silly sorry if I sounded serious:grinyes:
But like I said it's not really important anymore...

I don't know how we can use this to our advantage at all. My take is that it was a rule to make sure that a lynching happens everynight. If we think that the second vote getter is a zombie then why not vote for them in the first place???

I agree, I'm just worried about this rule with being down so many from the get go. If the person we are lynching is Zombie and the 2nd most votes isn't then a innocent gets lynched, I don't like this rule:lipssealedsmilie:

Plus we don't know who the doc is protecting...

I know that, it was kinda my point.

 

[johnlarson66]

Jl is moving up to my list. This has already been pointed out but I want to make my reasoning clear...earlier in the day he basically said that night one voting isn't important, or something to that effect, then votes ewurm for being a viking's fan...

Then he comes around and blames me, swayde and Ice for lynching Charlie who was an innocent who was going to die anyways. And he continues it...

Then he says to vote early because you can always change it...but what if you aren't around to change it? Is voting early with no info better than waiting until you are more sure that your vote is well placed?

It is too late to talk about this pertaining to CS, king or guppy as they didn't vote and are dead so why aren't you dropping the subject jl?

First, if you place a vote and are unable to change it, that is better than not posting a vote and being unable to change it. No voters are killed in this game. It makes perfect sense to vote early.

So yes, voting early with no info (but there is info, from who died and who did not die and who voted for who, ect). I get slammed for saying there is no real info on day one, but day two is full of info. Full of what we learned on day one.

So I am not dropping the subject because I see something to be learned.

A wrong vote for a player that was going to die anyway is better than a wrong vote for someone that was playing, ONLY if the person playing is bad or the person voting is bad. The town would learn something from the death of the person playing, not from the death of the players that were gonna die anyway.

Was CS death his own fault or Ice from swaying from me to CS. How is this good for the town. What really has me concerned is that Ice has said he thinks I am a zombie, so why not lynch me when he had the chance?

So this is why I keep harping about this. It does not make any sense.

 

[OgreMkV]

Plus we don't know who the doc is protecting...

The doc can't protect anyone until tomorrow night.

 

[johnlarson66]

If I am on the top of your list, then vote to lynch me.

If I was the LZ, I would have turned you, that is the best thing I can show you.

 

[johnlarson66]

You are the town’s Doctor. You are trying to develop an antibiotic to protect the citizens of ACville. You have a weak serum and it has limited duration so it cannot be used on the same person more than once. At the onset of night, you may protect one person with it and it will save them from being turned or killed by the zombies, starting with night #3. You may communicate with the Sherriff.

The Doc can protect people now, starting night 3 he can talk to the Sherriff.

 

[johnlarson66]

You are the Bodyguard. A self appointed task, you can protect one Townie each night from a lynching. However, your choice is for the next night’s protection. At the onset of Day 1, you will need to send me who you want to protect for night 1. As soon as night 1 rolls, you must send me who you want to protect on night 2, and so on. On the nights your protection is successful, the #2 person with the most votes.....is lynched.

It is when the bodyguard protects someone and it goes through then it goes to the 2nd vote getter. This goes in a day early.

 

[johnlarson66]

The doc can't protect anyone until tomorrow night.

Always a red flag when rules are not correctly told. This is false.