Sploke I am trying to figure out how you went from point A to point B with your thoughts on judge.
This does not seem like you are entirely suspicious of jm at all. You even said it was not necessarily incriminating.
Then you jump to saying she is suspicious??? If I read this correctly, you don't think her clue thing was suspicious but her excuses were???
Funny how you didn't see a solid reason to vote anyone and just chose plantling to go along with it but now you come back after being questioned and say that you agree with people about their suspicions of her. I have no doubt in my mind that you wouldn't have ever mentioned your vote on plantling again unless you decided to switch to another innocent tonight...
This post isn't making a whole lot of sense to me but I'll do my best to explain my thoughts.
First, yes looking at JM I saw the same pattern emerging. After a few more posts from her, it began to look (to me anyway) like an evil person trying really hard to seem innocent. So, hence the increase in suspicion level. that tends to happen in this game, people change their minds as they get new information and insights from others.
When I voted plantling, I stated then that I was going along with the reasons that had been previously given. Stating that again is not exactly a jump.
I'm not sure what you mean with the comment about not mentioning the vote again unless called out on it. Plenty of people make a vote then don't say much else about it unless they decide to change.
I guess I just don't see where the suspicion is coming from. You're taking normal game elements and saying that they are making me look suspicious. I'm not really sure how else to play the game besides looking for clues and changing my perceptions of people, then voting. If you have a better way, please feel free to enlighten me.