THE PLAY: Mafia #16 'Till death do we part...

[plantling]

Night fall is actually supposed to be wens. nov 14 @8:00pm. sorry for any inconvenience.

phew! that gives us more time to think about our lynch votes.

i still would like to hear from AkaPaul. However, I do agree that Liz's statement that everyone should act more Mafia-like is a bit suspicious. It could be she was just trying to joke, but Not Funny in this town.

 

[Lady G]

eh i think its another case of jumping on a newbie...as far as I know anyway; has Liz ever played a game before? If not, it can be quite a shock how things you say suddenly are huge implications of guilt, the first time through. It still gets me sometimes how things get turned around on myself..but anyway yeah if Liz has never played a game before I'm chalking it up to inexperience.

Sploke I understand that and agree to a point, but I know when I was new and my name was mentioned b/c of something I said, I tried to explain my meaning a little, not come back with: Yeah, I want to be obvious and state a vote saying they are voting an innocent: no that is not exact wording but what she said in a nut shell.

The last few games we have let the newbs slide so to say and were bit in the arse for it with a couple. If something else comes up on someone else, I will remove my vote or if she somehow, get's me to change my mind with future post, I will also b/c I really do hate voting a newb on day one. I would switch to AKA because at least Liz is posting, but really voting someone who may be dieing a UD seems of no use or help to us.

 

[Sploke]

fair enough, i wasn't trying to change your mind...although i think that jumping on a newb that turns out to be innocent can tell us something, because it makes an easy hiding place for the mafia.

 

[jpappy789]

Quite a lot of votes on Liz already...not trying to defend her or anything but I agree with sploke, quite a lot of people jumped on her for not really doing anything.

DD has made two "cases" against people. Not full blown cases but she is already putting some quotes together. So how she did not catch jo's sarcasm and then she got on the Liz vote. This has me worried.

I vote to lynch DD

 

[jpappy789]

Jm, is that CST or EST?

 

[jpappy789]

ok, I didn;t know if things were going to come up so quickly but apparently in everyone's giddyness to get the game rolling, I found something that peaked my interest.

here, Jo says she feels Kuhli had a great find... gee I am hoping she is not talking about the whole "beat the movers" thing. If that wasn't a twist of words, I dunno what was. Nonetheless, she says kuhli is a 1, most innocent.


Here, Jo says, let's get the ball moving... throws a vote out for, you guessed it, kulhi. But why, after all , she did have kuhli as most innocent. She never did explain that maybe she was thinking incorrectly or if she agreed with anything... only that ok, she may be jumping a newbie and it will probably change... I dunno.... it's not something I would do even just to throw out a ball if I thought someone was that innocent as to be a 1.


I just may venture to vote Jo... I think I will..... I vote to lynch Joander (subject of course, to change)

Jo.... did I just mess up the nuptuals?

DD's vote on jo

darn, sorry Jo... I was looking at how rb wrote "Joan" and remembered I called someone a he last game and it turned out to being a she...

no, didn't pick up on the sarcasm though, thanks for the explanation.

now understands sarcasm but no removal of vote

I will go back and checking when I get some more time. I have a doctors appointment this afternoon and need to do some errands, I will check after then.


Liz mentions "Mafia" in her posts a lot, maybe as an internal thing that she needs to in order to be at one with her guilt. Here she goes....mentions mafia.... a spin


mafia again with another spin
ummmm not sure why she posted a pic of a mafia guy.... maybe she is obsessed?

and mafia again. Here she makes a statement which makes no sense at all especially because she is new to the game. Shesays if she were mafia, she'd want tomake it obvious.... I am not sure if she already has or what she is saying.

Sorry Liz, you have posted nothng but suspicious posts.... I remove my vote on kuhli and vote to lynch Liz

retracts vote on kuhli!?!? anyone else catch this?

 

[Lady G]

Jm, is that CST or EST?

Hmmm, I thought she said EST but I just looked back and in the sign up thread and I don't see it???
So, yeah Jmax which is it? Blah...again I wont be here for a night one lynching, maybe I should call and tell them at work I will be late cause I can't miss the lynch!!:grinyes:

 

[jpappy789]

Update of Day One:

Kuhli (1)- jo (77)
Liz (6)- rb (78) niko (111) blue (118) lg (122) dc (123) dd (126)
Rb (1)- hn (79)
jo (0)- dd (88)
akapaul (2)- chas (113) plant (128)
dd (2)- cl (115) jpap (134)

No vote from: akapaul, Liz, kuhli, Ice, Johnlarson, Sploke

 

[jpappy789]

yuh cuz if I was mafia I'd want to make it obvious.

Perhaps I'll vote to lynch atnixon, it's very suspicious that he wants to lynch an innocent.

ps "at" is a preposition and you shouldn't end a sentence with a preposition. lol. I had that crap drilled into my head wayyy too much.

Liz's post above DD responds to that post with this...

and mafia again. Here she makes a statement which makes no sense at all especially because she is new to the game. Shesays if she were mafia, she'd want tomake it obvious.... I am not sure if she already has or what she is saying.

Sorry Liz, you have posted nothng but suspicious posts.... I remove my vote on kuhli and vote to lynch Liz

Once again DD you fail to pick up the sarcasm. Are you that eager to jump on people?

 

[Lady G]

ok, I didn;t know if things were going to come up so quickly but apparently in everyone's giddyness to get the game rolling, I found something that peaked my interest.

here, Jo says she feels Kuhli had a great find... gee I am hoping she is not talking about the whole "beat the movers" thing. If that wasn't a twist of words, I dunno what was. Nonetheless, she says kuhli is a 1, most innocent.


Here, Jo says, let's get the ball moving... throws a vote out for, you guessed it, kulhi. But why, after all , she did have kuhli as most innocent. She never did explain that maybe she was thinking incorrectly or if she agreed with anything... only that ok, she may be jumping a newbie and it will probably change... I dunno.... it's not something I would do even just to throw out a ball if I thought someone was that innocent as to be a 1.


I just may venture to vote Jo... I think I will..... I vote to lynch Joander (subject of course, to change)

Jo.... did I just mess up the nuptuals?

DD's vote on jo



now understands sarcasm but no removal of vote



retracts vote on kuhli!?!? anyone else catch this?

Well, I can see your point here Pap, but what I am wondering even more is why DID Jo think Kuhli to be a 1, then vote him?
Since nightfall isn't until tomorrow I am going to retract my vote for Liz, at this time. Liz you are not off the hook, my vote may very well end up back on you...but there is more time then I was thinking and other things have come up.