But Kuhli, you were on for an hour the first go round..if you'd like I can pull up the times of all your posts for you.
Mafia 17: Vampires
- Thread starter IceH2O
- Start date
But Kuhli, you were on for an hour the first go round..if you'd like I can pull up the times of all your posts for you.
Dangerdoll
Global Moderator
I completely hated the reasoning you gave, kuhlie that said "who said the "hour" had to all be at once?" I think it's a poor excuse to use and believe you threw it out there in case someone chose to pick up on any absences you might partake it. Nice to have a catchall there...... silly mistake really. Just sitting and reaading up on posts takes 10 minutes at the very least. I am having doubts because of this defense and about my vote on rb because of what has already been said and agree that it would be something if roles were hand picked and a newbie was given the LV roll. If being led, I would gather to guess there is a vet in the second position to help the LV out. Rb may be that person... his posting war with HN certainly didn't show it not to be the case. I'm thinking of changing my vote in this case though and may change it to Kuhlie.... am on the fence about it.
You know, I hate it when two people get into a "argument" In this thread, because it makes it **** near impossible to look past that, and at things that are really going on, I know many of us ( players who have been in several games) have done this, and have been sorry, and most of the time, we are actually innocent, I am going to over look both, HN, and RB, for now, And re-read the thread, someone had to be more guilty, then an argument. I am in no way saying that I think either are innocent, just that, I am willing to give them both another night.
you know what, actually as I read the first few pages, I think I found me likley candidate, I remove the stake from Lady G and twirl around in time to stick a stake in Plantling. .She is always bringing up cases against everyone else, I know, that that is a helpful role, but after I thought about it, its the first day, and lets face it, why are you trying that hard this early? plant, you really want to appear helpful huh?.
Ok, Kuhli...had you come on and said something like, my dad didn't know I was on...or my dad let me have more time or any thing on those lines I would of let it slide. But NO you had to come on and be defensive saying "who said the hour had to be all at once"
Well here I'll show you it was well over an hour:
Your post start at 10:06-11:27 that right there is an hour and 16 minutes.
Came back on from 1:51-2:18 another what 18 minutes.
Back again from 6:34-6:57 another 17 minutes
then one post at 8:42
so altogether there you have close to 2 hours of computer time.
As I said had you come back with any other response I would not of took the time to go back and add up each minute, but you chose to say "Who said it had to be all at once". There it was over an hour, if you are going to start the game off with an "excuse" as to why you wont be on much that is fine, and understandable...but when you deviate away from that excuse really you should have something to back it up with. Like "Oh my dad was gone and I got on" or "My dad gave me more time today" anything would of been better then what you said, cause all that did was make me prove my point.
Well here I'll show you it was well over an hour:
Your post start at 10:06-11:27 that right there is an hour and 16 minutes.
Came back on from 1:51-2:18 another what 18 minutes.
Back again from 6:34-6:57 another 17 minutes
then one post at 8:42
so altogether there you have close to 2 hours of computer time.
As I said had you come back with any other response I would not of took the time to go back and add up each minute, but you chose to say "Who said it had to be all at once". There it was over an hour, if you are going to start the game off with an "excuse" as to why you wont be on much that is fine, and understandable...but when you deviate away from that excuse really you should have something to back it up with. Like "Oh my dad was gone and I got on" or "My dad gave me more time today" anything would of been better then what you said, cause all that did was make me prove my point.
Jmax, she very well may be Vamp..I have no idea, but right now there are only 2 out there...and I think everyone needs to be looked at, so yeah I see why she has posted thoughts on several ppl. Are you sure this isn't a OMGUS vote..just b/c she voted you?
i dont feel a need to keep that much of a close eye on her at this present moment as that is simply all i see it as, Plantling banging on doors and seeing what responses come from that..i think its quite a good tactic from the get go as it gets the ball rolling and provokes responses....
Well, maybe it would be, if she had voted me?..are you sure your paying attention Lady G?..I checked, unless maybe I am crazy, I don't see a vote from her on me, and I think I will switch back to you....
i retract my retraction, and wish to stick a stake into Lady G who, is obviously back to her old "evil" self!
And I know, I can hear LG now: OMGUS! LOL
But LG , you say about other people skimming, and plant voted for JO, not me?...
