Some of this is pre-nightfall, but still valid.
I kept the vote on LG because she stated she would rather vote off annoyance then possible evil.
Its only my opinion right now. I could very well be wrong but I don't feel as though I am. But in the same sense if I'm wrong I don't want to be tied to that person if I'm right I don't want to be the one that gets them hit.
It won't be as easy to pick them out from my above description because it was in the flow of the game that made me feel as I do. I went back to reread the section and I don't get the same feeling now as I did as it happened.
But till they show me different I have no reason to suspect them as of now.
There is a pretty significant precedent for voting off annoying people. Or are you skimming my posts?
Again read my post instead of just pulling answers out of the air. My post was being written, I didn't see that HN switched, my vote would have been the 5th on Zig pushing him 2 ahead of JM. My vote alone on Ogre was doing no one any good and Zig was my 2nd suspect.
I didn't break a tie either. My vote after the HN switch tied it up.
So which is it?
The point is that AT THE TIME, you would have been shooting for the tie.
Well, Zig looks pretty guilty now. ZS went at him, and maybe Zig answered with a hit.
Doesn't quite work that way. Scum doesn't want to eliminate evil that has fingered them. It's too easy for the town to find them that way. More than likely, they want to AVOID players that have fingered them.
Hitting an innocent that has been on the wrong page makes for confusion.
who is leading you though??? who could it be i think its either Jpap JL or Grins they seem to be in the back for the most part not doing to much just interjecting a few tidbits now and again but which one ????
John maybe, Jpap I don't buy him. Grins maybe, but not probably.
First off, I am sorry to see that judgemax was innocent. I do not think she was contributing to the town very much. I thought we had one there.
I go back and forth about zigman, but it makes me uncomfortable that he had voted Zsandmann and then the evils tested him. Seems like a setup.
There are a few things I would like to review, but at this point I do not want to vote for Zigman. I also have Grins and Catfish leaning innocent.
Holy cow, I agree with John. This is either total insanity or we've figured it out.
Look..
I didnt like Zsandmann because he was telling me what plantling was trying to say. as if he were coaching plantling... Thats why I didnt trust him ( or plantling). maybe i overreacted and tried a little to hard to defend my innocence, but thats why he got my vote.
Since the whole town knew how he and I went around, it would make sense for the evils to put the hit on him, because everyone would think I did it.. Would be pretty obvious I think. I was the only vote for him... I'm going back to Zsands suspect list and see who is there, because if the evils weren't out to set me up, then Zsand must have been on to something...
But I didn't.
Whoops... forgot about Plantling... Now you're thinking Zig.
I doubt that. If anything it makes Zig look less guilty.
If I was evil, I would want ZSandmann gone, unless he was looking real evil to everyone. I would keep Ice, HN and myself around and most likely Ogre, they all make good suspects. Assuming of course none of them are evil.
If I was evil, I think of the players left, I would want plantling gone.
I would want to also keep zig and catfish around for entertainment and general kaos.
This post by CL has him moving up a few notches.
I agree... unless Plantling is also evil.
Grins, lets try this again.
At the time I was writing my post changing my vote HN had switched. Instead of my vote making it from 4-2 to 5-2 HNs switch caused it to be 3-3 thus making mine 4-3. The vote wasn't made on purpose to break a tie. Yours was purposely made to break a tie and kill an innocent.
I thought you said (above) that your vote would have made it two more than JMax, if so then it wouldn't have come out tied.
I've got to agree with that. If anything has leaned Zig innocent (and nothing before had to me), the hit on Z does. Cory may need to be watched more closely. I'm more concerned about Pappy leaning him innocent and choosing to explain it before night (when JM was already in the lead).
Julz- Sorry I voted for you, but you looked evil. Want to trade backgrounds for books?
My current list
Leaning innocent
Zig
Grins
Leaning Evil
Ice
Plantling
Totally neutral
John - change from previous
Jpap
catfish - although it seemed like catfish may have been instigating between Zig and ZSand some.
I vote to do a genetic test on Ice.
I would be willing to change to Plantling. Anything else will take some serious convincing.