Mafia 37 (35?) 50/50

Okay I'm gonna vote to lynch NJ as all this sausage talk might be a vieled attempted to get the hot dog man.

What you think shes after your sausage????
 
WOW! I was not expecting this to start tonight getting ready for a huge cook out so, i have no time, will be on tom eve, ..and post have a happy and safe fourth all!!
 
Guess I should have used the dead fish puzzle for my example... I need to go back and see who jumped bandwagon votes on me I think. There may be some Bobbie's and Charlies among us already...

Btw my dear Lady G... you said "studdering." Since I think you meant stuttering, I simply conjured up what that might mean exactly. *lol* Wow not a lot of deep thought so far all - even that joke fell flat. Maybe the sausage ended up a distraction - funny since the whole point of the exercise was how one goes about logically eliminating suspects based on relationships and if that person's statement is a lie, whether it actually reveals the truth. Heaven forbid someone actually try to move the search in some type of helpful direction. Well, other than Ogre who usually seems to do ok theorizing, while rarely being lynched as a result. It doesn't look like I have that knack for some reason.

The interesting part to this game is that with the numbers being the way they are, we don't have a whole lot of lynches to waste on innocents until we accidentally happen on a deserved hit. So that means more strategy will be involved instead of suicide pacts and "lynch me to find out if I'm innocent" or "let's lynch so-and-so, if they're innocent, oh well." type of votes. That being said, obviously this is way early in the game. But if someone doesn't get some discussion going, this will be a pretty boring game - possibly a short one. Or maybe a long one. We want an interesting game, but I begin to get tired of being the only one to stick my neck out to discuss potential thoughts, and being rewarded by the entire town lynching me for pretty much no reason, other than that I had the courage to be one of the few to speak up?

Any way town, ball's in your court, have fun finding things in this response to build some kind of case around. Considering that this is meant to help the town rally and communicate better, instead of the mudslinging of past games, I would have to think seriously about anyone coming out of the water with strategy talk as some reason why I should be lynched. Instead, one would thing they'd look at those afraid to speak up and draw too much attention to themselves, in case it turns out they're actually found guilty?

Food for thought. Spicy, seasoned food for thought...

(Chill you make me laugh. *lol*
 
I'm glad I make you laugh NJ this should be fun.

I tend to agree with you on the not lynching innocents part. I'm thinking the suicide bomer might take some of the enthusiasm out of that as every innocent lynched now carries potential consequence for the last two voters. It will be interesting to see how that effects the game play.

I also agree this will be a dull game if people are afraid to speak up and have their words scrutinized. I know what you're saying about offering an opinion, it is about the same as offering your neck for a rope fitting. Been there, done that, will do it again, but so what it's just a game. I can't see sitting quietly as being much fun.
 
Chill leaves the hot dog stand closed again today. He's just going to sit on the sidewalk in his lawn chair and watch the pretty girls go by in their summer clothes. He cranks up "Paint and Black" and enjoys the warm sun on his face.
 
AquariaCentral.com