Mafia 40 "Life behind bars" The Play

LOL, how true!! Then I guess NJ is playing too right..so someone else I can go back and forth with LMAO!! Hey what ever happend to John???

Bring it sister, I'm more than willing to defend my Prada pillowcase!
 
HN, I still haven't seen a post for nightfall...is it still Monday night?

I am thinking JM1212 would be a good shank vote right about now...they seem to be on and posting quite a bit for a newb. Nothing really of any substance but posts none the less. Let's see what you others think.

I think this is a terrible idea - is it more like a Parolee to want to go after the newer players, or more the strategy of a Lifer? I'm inclined to think this is such a bad idea, it must be the desperate attempt of a Parolee, a Lifer might not even attempt a ploy on the newbs because it would bring bad attention on them. (especially since there really isn't any reason in my mind to single out this person in particular! Just cause he's posting a more than previous newbs? He's probably read people saying the low posters are usually up first on the chopping block - and maybe it's a new player getting into the game and enjoy it.)

That being said, it's so obvious and not good, nothing substantial, that it definitely warrants keeping my eye on you (and you'll agree and probably say 'go ahead people usually do!')

On one hand it does indicate looking towards progressing through the entertainment value of this already great thread, to the task at hand, but picking on that person of all the other scrumptious choices still smells fishy to me.

Like last night's "soup!"

I mean I'm not saying he's innocent, or that I'm sticking up for him, I'm just saying I don't like seeing people target newer persons off the get go, for no reason, (not only because it discourages new people from playing), ah well I've rambled long enough.

Perhaps someone will now come along, count every third letter and draw up some suspicious statement it spells. *lol*
 
Rar...are we getting grumpy in our "older" age??? You call that "bush" kickin...I call it trying to draw attention to someone for really no reason. Really, this isn't something that would make me vote you or them...none of ya's are ringing in bells in my head at the moment. Although it does seem to me you were pointing it out, just to get others to jump them and it is something that stands out to me personally.

My last comment for today... let's see if you can all follow this, probably not - cell mates tell the guards all the time they want a new cell, cause I ramble too much...

If Mafia games are Opposite world where the innocent people are more ready to lynch other innocents at the cost of finding the truth, and those who hold back lynching, are considered guilty; then in my opposite world, Lady G's statement that someone else is drawing attention to someone else for no reason, and that stands out to her personally, makes her highly suspicious to me, and unfortunately up first on my List. I could definitely be wrong, it's first night voting, but it looks perfectly set up for someone who was looking for an opportunity to jump on an innocent (who's sticking out a big because they're playing their usual aggressive method), because it COULD normally be reasonable.

I vote to lynch Lady G.

It's not much to go on, and I love her to death so you know it's not personal. It's ironically the same logic she used on me, on the first game, where being innocent at the time, I acted too innocently and it made me look guilty.
 
*cough*

There is no "lynching" in this game.
 
Neon...not reading the rules...or not understanding them..
 
I think this is a terrible idea - is it more like a Parolee to want to go after the newer players, or more the strategy of a Lifer? I'm inclined to think this is such a bad idea, it must be the desperate attempt of a Parolee, a Lifer might not even attempt a ploy on the newbs because it would bring bad attention on them. (especially since there really isn't any reason in my mind to single out this person in particular! Just cause he's posting a more than previous newbs? He's probably read people saying the low posters are usually up first on the chopping block - and maybe it's a new player getting into the game and enjoy it.)

That being said, it's so obvious and not good, nothing substantial, that it definitely warrants keeping my eye on you (and you'll agree and probably say 'go ahead people usually do!')

On one hand it does indicate looking towards progressing through the entertainment value of this already great thread, to the task at hand, but picking on that person of all the other scrumptious choices still smells fishy to me.

Like last night's "soup!"

I mean I'm not saying he's innocent, or that I'm sticking up for him, I'm just saying I don't like seeing people target newer persons off the get go, for no reason, (not only because it discourages new people from playing), ah well I've rambled long enough.

Perhaps someone will now come along, count every third letter and draw up some suspicious statement it spells. *lol*
such as what's with such a protection on jm?
 
I think this is a terrible idea - is it more like a Parolee to want to go after the newer players, or more the strategy of a Lifer? I'm inclined to think this is such a bad idea, it must be the desperate attempt of a Parolee, a Lifer might not even attempt a ploy on the newbs because it would bring bad attention on them. (especially since there really isn't any reason in my mind to single out this person in particular! Just cause he's posting a more than previous newbs? He's probably read people saying the low posters are usually up first on the chopping block - and maybe it's a new player getting into the game and enjoy it.)

That being said, it's so obvious and not good, nothing substantial, that it definitely warrants keeping my eye on you (and you'll agree and probably say 'go ahead people usually do!')

On one hand it does indicate looking towards progressing through the entertainment value of this already great thread, to the task at hand, but picking on that person of all the other scrumptious choices still smells fishy to me.

Like last night's "soup!"

I mean I'm not saying he's innocent, or that I'm sticking up for him, I'm just saying I don't like seeing people target newer persons off the get go, for no reason, (not only because it discourages new people from playing), ah well I've rambled long enough.

Perhaps someone will now come along, count every third letter and draw up some suspicious statement it spells. *lol*


Would you prefer we just concentrate on the ramblers..you and Lady G?
 
Well, Ice, everyone has their own way of getting things going. I don't particularly think you are pointing out anything important, just trying to get the spotlight as normal.

No it wasn't anything important to me either till they defended it.

I agree with Rb...day one is always chit chat especially when its longer than 24 hrs. I see no need to stir the pot when there is nothing to stir.

So how do you decide who to vote for? Especially on Day 1 you need to bring small things out into the open and get responses. They will either ease your mind or fluster the person into screwing up more. If we all just sat back and chit chat how do we decide who to vote for? Give me some direction here.


Lets make this game even more interesting. I'm going to ride coat tails the rest of the game. Since so many of you do it maybe its more fun and challenging and I'm missing out.
 
I volunteer to ride Lady G's coat tails. I will take a camera with me.
 
AquariaCentral.com