Mafia 40 "Life behind bars" The Play

[noodles62]

I'm so there!!!!!


Awww, Noodles I'll share with ya if you want some...after all we ARE tag team partners aren't we

Thanks G!

 

[Lady G]

OK...let me try to redeem myself here.

All innocents get an investigation excluding underground but the Spy still gets one. If we all investigate on night 2 we have our best chance of getting the info we need, as all but 2 innocents will get an investigation and we will be in the highest numbers(of course the snitches will get 1 too). Lets do a 3 way check. We all vote for our top 6 investigations in order before nightfall. 3 people will investigate each of those individuals with the exception of the bottom vote getter will be investigated by 2 people. This is because 2 people will be gone after nightfall with the shank & the beat down and we will have 17 players. 3 vote for top 5 (equals 15) and 2 vote for bottom vote getter (equals 2) 17 players. Now we will not know about 2 of the investigations because of the shank & beat down on night 2. We can also vote for someone to make the list of who votes for who. Most likely a newbie since I would assume they are less likely to be evil. This will also turn up useful for future if anyone is found out to be lying they were either a snitch or a PR who didn't get an investigation. Everyone can give their findings after night 2. I know it seems a little confusing but read and pick this apart and give suggestions and opinions.

I do agree we should reveal our investigaions, especially if a snitch is found. My problem is though, who do I trust to believe thier "investigation" results?

 

[Rbishop]

I would believe yours, Lady G....

 

[dirtydawg10]

I do agree we should reveal our investigaions, especially if a snitch is found. My problem is though, who do I trust to believe thier "investigation" results?

That's why I'm saying we have to vote for who people will investigate and have a 3 way check to help weed out bad information. Any bad information found will eventually come out in the wash this way.

 

[[AC] Tree_Hugger]

OK...let me try to redeem myself here.

All innocents get an investigation excluding underground but the Spy still gets one. If we all investigate on night 2 we have our best chance of getting the info we need, as all but 2 innocents will get an investigation and we will be in the highest numbers(of course the snitches will get 1 too). Lets do a 3 way check. We all vote for our top 6 investigations in order before nightfall. 3 people will investigate each of those individuals with the exception of the bottom vote getter will be investigated by 2 people. This is because 2 people will be gone after nightfall with the shank & the beat down and we will have 17 players. 3 vote for top 5 (equals 15) and 2 vote for bottom vote getter (equals 2) 17 players. Now we will not know about 2 of the investigations because of the shank & beat down on night 2. We can also vote for someone to make the list of who votes for who. Most likely a newbie since I would assume they are less likely to be evil. This will also turn up useful for future if anyone is found out to be lying they were either a snitch or a PR who didn't get an investigation. Everyone can give their findings after night 2. I know it seems a little confusing but read and pick this apart and give suggestions and opinions.

Does it make more sense for everyone to investigate early, or wait until later in the game, once things have started to congeal? There seems to be benefits/drawbacks for both.

 

[Lady G]

I would believe yours, Lady G....

Awww, well thanks Daddy O!! Although, I have to say you are being a little to nice to me LMAO!!!!

That's why I'm saying we have to vote for who people will investigate and have a 3 way check to help weed out bad information. Any bad information found will eventually come out in the wash this way.

I think if we have a few ppl agree to investigate the same person, that would help. Is that what you are saying?

 

[Rbishop]

It will still come down to who you believe. With an unknown quantity of snitches they can trhow any tally of results and cause confusion. I think it will be nice to reveal some, but more likely to help each innocent resolve their own suspicions of one other.

 

[Rbishop]

Hmmm..there has to be a way out of here. Time to do some research at the library. Never know hat you might learn there.

 

[jpappy789]

Yep, too soon to say anything for sure.

Maybe I'm a little jumpy but your willingness to agree with everybody and come off as a nice guy is unnerving. Of course you are new to the game but you so far have my eye.

OMG!!!

First I thought the game was to start tonight.

Second I'm glad and also mortified to see how much posting I have to go back and read.

Third I just watched a movie last night called felon with val kilmar that everyone playing this game should watch.

One post and nothing else...

After a long evening at work... release, jbradt is in an introspective mood. It seems that the interactions among these people come in a few definite flavors... :rofl:, :duh:, :bs:, :argue:, and :screwy:. Most of it seems pretty inane. Like the ramble of people honestly trying to make the best of being stuck here.

But there were snitches afoot, and until they were found, somebody was gonna get shanked, and everybody knew it. Most of the other inmates seem pretty calm, but that rb... he was looking for something. Maybe it was a red herring, maybe elvis and bigfoot would bring him one with the smokes. Anything is theoretically possible. He's aweful jumpy though to come out and call out a guy for being a snitch in the first day. That might mean he has something to hide. And somebody has to go, so I vote to shank rbishop.

Nothing personal, rb. I enjoyed our little banter but you were the only one to give me even a small reason not to trust you.

With that particular decision off his mind, he lays down on his cot (back firmly against the wall), and waits to see if he wakes up. opcorn:

Interesting vote and interesting reason. Again you being a newb at the game I will cut you some slack but at this point you are the only one who has really caught my eye.

Does it make more sense for everyone to investigate early, or wait until later in the game, once things have started to congeal? There seems to be benefits/drawbacks for both.

I too see benefits and drawbacks for both. Investigating early obviously gives us more chance to catch a snitch and to confirm it. However there is a better chance for the snitches to throw around names and cause confusion. Saving the investigations for later narrows the field but also leaves us with less people to do investigations. Definitely something to keep talking about.

At this point I really need to go back and read thoroughly through posts. I'll probably have to make my decision soon.

 

[Rbishop]

No hurry, jpap...nightfall isn't until Monday night.....right before lights out....