Mafia 40 "Life behind bars" The Play

Ok here it is

I went back and did some rereading and noticed this...



The first time I read it I didn't think much of it other than him accusing me of being Chill's teammate. This time I read point #2 and it sent up a few flags. How can one team have multiple invests on the same person? There is a communicating underground team and a communicating snitch team. If they are communicating how do they investigate the same person multiple times unless they want to?

Then I read this...



Isn't the Underground innocent anyway? or is it possible for a member of the underground (the spy or maybe all of them) to be evil but non-communicating with the snitches. That is the only way it would be possible for the same team to do a multiple investigation on the same person without choosing to do so. Did Ice know this?

Maybe HN can shed some light here on the undergrounds innocence.

and maybe Ice could shed some light on his train of thought for question #2...maybe I'm missing something here.

Wow I was sleeping...how did I miss that in the rules in bold and everything?
 
OK and here is the bit I wanted to highlight. For someone who was trying to whatever help us understand the rules the rules you did a crummy job. OK so you say there are communicating teams and so there would be no multiple investigations by those players unless they wanted to and you are saying this as some kind of a criticism of something Ice said.

But the communicating teams don't have investigations so like duh. And then you don't even realise what you said was wrong in that way just about the underground showing as innocence or being innocent or something. Nice job thanks for your help haha.


The Underground & the Snitches can communicate amongst themselves outside of the thread.

Each innocent (Except Underground Members) has ONE investigation to use. Snitches will appear innocent on night 1.
 
That's why I'm saying we have to vote for who people will investigate and have a 3 way check to help weed out bad information. Any bad information found will eventually come out in the wash this way.
just because two people report the same conclusion does not mean that it is the right one.
 
Last edited:
No hurry, jpap...nightfall isn't until Monday night.....right before lights out....
You're right, I was thinking tonight was nightfall for some reason. Which is a good thing because I will have more time to post tomorrow...I have to go plant flowers with my mom :mad:
 
From the rules...

6) Do not edit your posts!
 
Well darn, here I thought I was doing my duty before I left yesterday. I should probably go back an read, I thought last night or this morning would be nightfall because of the weird time zone for me, so since I knew I wouldn't get back in time, I thought I'd leave a vote that would count. Silly me. I should probably fix that.

I vote to shank Lady G.[/g]

I hope that's the right terminology, (I still can't see this monitor and reading's a real pain.)

If not, I'm sure someone will come along in a helpful, or 8 hours later (where was everyone else when I was posting eh?), and tell me I'm wrong. *lol*

The reasons still stand, it's exactly as I said it - and wow the defensiveness poured forth a little bit. If one says that a mafia whatever-you-call-them-in-this-game would do their best to look lily white, while starting trains, I think we saw that.

It's more typical for them to jump on someone else for their 'aggressive vote' then for them to actually be the aggressor - hence Dirtydawg, he shouldn't have picked on the littler/new guys, a perfect opportunity for an actual Mafia person to look like they're innocent by accusing him. When I think more than that, getting on the case of a newer player for no reason is such a bad move, a real mafia person (unless they really don't want to last long in the game), would never go there, it's too risky. But someone else might easily jump on them for looking guilty. It's possible Lady G is innocent, like I said, it's only night 1, but I know my playing pattern, and I know that on the weekends, I have to be fast, short and sweet, because I may never get back to the game, so I don't have a lot of time to dither around and drink and sing songs, at least not unil the weekday rolls around.

It's not like I think any of you should also vote her out, this is a great game, with lots of interesting people, and each person's Night 1 introductions and style will be different - it'll be tricky as always to get a read. I'm not holding Lady G's and our first game together, but I feel that her strategy might be a repeat, only in the opposite, someone trying to look too innocent could be guilty. That's all. IT's night 1 folks. All I know is in the last game I played, before HN hoodwinked his own partner, I had been right almost every time about each person, so hopefully my "gut" will continue to work. Or vote me out, whatever, but I know my status and I know that if a lynch comes, you'll all be nowhere when it comes to finding the snitches. I'm not really concerned though, after all it is Night 1, and somebody's gotta go, and it's very rarely someone who's guilty.
 
ARgh I vote to shank Lady G unless that's the incorrect terminology... anyway, people usually vote for her on day one. It USED to be a joke, but maybe the humors gone now, and let the OMGUS catfights begin. *lol*
 
Well darn, here I thought I was doing my duty before I left yesterday. I should probably go back an read, I thought last night or this morning would be nightfall because of the weird time zone for me, so since I knew I wouldn't get back in time, I thought I'd leave a vote that would count. Silly me. I should probably fix that.

I vote to shank Lady G.[/g]

I hope that's the right terminology, (I still can't see this monitor and reading's a real pain.)

If not, I'm sure someone will come along in a helpful, or 8 hours later (where was everyone else when I was posting eh?), and tell me I'm wrong. *lol*

The reasons still stand, it's exactly as I said it - and wow the defensiveness poured forth a little bit. If one says that a mafia whatever-you-call-them-in-this-game would do their best to look lily white, while starting trains, I think we saw that.

It's more typical for them to jump on someone else for their 'aggressive vote' then for them to actually be the aggressor - hence Dirtydawg, he shouldn't have picked on the littler/new guys, a perfect opportunity for an actual Mafia person to look like they're innocent by accusing him. When I think more than that, getting on the case of a newer player for no reason is such a bad move, a real mafia person (unless they really don't want to last long in the game), would never go there, it's too risky. But someone else might easily jump on them for looking guilty. It's possible Lady G is innocent, like I said, it's only night 1, but I know my playing pattern, and I know that on the weekends, I have to be fast, short and sweet, because I may never get back to the game, so I don't have a lot of time to dither around and drink and sing songs, at least not unil the weekday rolls around.

It's not like I think any of you should also vote her out, this is a great game, with lots of interesting people, and each person's Night 1 introductions and style will be different - it'll be tricky as always to get a read. I'm not holding Lady G's and our first game together, but I feel that her strategy might be a repeat, only in the opposite, someone trying to look too innocent could be guilty. That's all. IT's night 1 folks. All I know is in the last game I played, before HN hoodwinked his own partner, I had been right almost every time about each person, so hopefully my "gut" will continue to work. Or vote me out, whatever, but I know my status and I know that if a lynch comes, you'll all be nowhere when it comes to finding the snitches. I'm not really concerned though, after all it is Night 1, and somebody's gotta go, and it's very rarely someone who's guilty.



hmmm...more incoherent ramblings....
 
AquariaCentral.com