Ice I agree we can't say who we are going to invest and therefore can't rule out double ups but I see BKW as trying to bring us together. I think we all need to agree when we will use our invests but give no tell of who we will use it on. In fact it would be best if we all choose at random who we invest, negating our own inclinations of who we think are snitches. Randomness is certain to get a good coverage and as I said double ups will only help solidify our claims. The second condition is that if you don't get a snitch you say nothing of the results of your invest.
here are some of my thoughts...
in addition to lashing out at me for no apparent reason early in the game, dirtydawg has also caught my eye for a couple of reasons. he tends to switch his ideas around to where the majority is going. in post 85, he claimed that i was supicious because i was chatty. then, in post 209 he said that newbies are more likely to be innocent than not. he did the same thing later on the issue of investigations, while everyone else was pretty clear on their views and stuck to them. it looks as if he is trying to blend in his thoughts with the majority. i also have considered the aggressiveness that NeonJulie mentioned in her post.
jbradt's defensiveness and attacking of rbishop caught my eye too. it was interesting to see him try to twist around jpap's words to his own defense after rbishop responded. his aggressiveness may have just been a "newbie" characteristic, but it sounds like he may acctually have something to hide. for example, on a few occasions he brought up being accused of being a snitch without anyone even mentioning it. again, this was with rbishop. another very suspicious area that jbradt was running into was trust. it sounded like he wanted to earn our trust, something that you cannot give out in this game.
I vote to shank dirtydawg10
Well, my vote is leaning to an OMGUS on brad.....but I also do not care for the chill and Dawg interaction today.
Oh My Gosh yoU Suck
Dang...I guess there really is no good way to orchestrate this investigation deal. We'll just all have to trust who we trust and hope not everyone investigates the same person...end of story.
Nope...I haven't been going back and forth on anything except in my own mind on the use of the investigations. I've always been for an organized use of the investigations but I've given up thinking about it.
On the other hand you don't seem to have begun to think about it. What's your opinion?
I see what you are suggesting now BKW and it makes a lot of sense. I read your post the same as Ice did. I think your plan is good and I'd be willing to do it.
As for my post I was more talking to myself there. I said dang because if I said **** the **** server would edit it out anyway. I said end of story because I have been going back and forth on the investigations issue and it is driving me crazy. I'm giving up thinking about the investigations other than my own. I think your plan is nice and simple and will work if everyone chooses to participate.
Well, my vote is leaning to an OMGUS on brad.....but I also do not care for the chill and Dawg interaction today.
Hey dude, after your episode the other day, I spent the rest of the night feeling like I ruined your fun in the game. That didn't feel good, so I'm pretty much out. I joined this to have fun and maybe shoot a few good-natured one-liners out there. That isn't how it turned out for me.
I'll continue to follow the thread as maybe I just missed the point of the game, I can't wait to see how it turns out.
I have to agree that dawg you have beein doing alot of flip flopping. it only took one post to convince you to agree to the plan, while everyone else posted questions trying to get more info. Just seems you accepted it to fast.
Other suspect would be:
Zsand-like dawg accepted things a little to fast. Defending another player so early in the game is just trying to look innocent(or not snitchish)
I vote to shank Dawg
My weapon of choice is a sharpend piece of soap, i think it's irish spring.