[AC] Doomsday998;1577273 said:No you get one random person to choose. They will choose 2 people to investigate the chooser. Then the 2 people come back and tell us of their results. But the 2 people who investigated would also be investigated themselves. It would be a pyramid style.
1
/ \
2 2
/ \ / \
3 3 3 3
Sorta like this. It would eat up 6 investigations but it would prove 3 people without a doubt. It would create up to 4 people if their investigations were different.
I just do not think saying who we plan to investigate is wise period. In your example here...who decides who investigates together???wow, busy day again today. I am not sure I understand your logic G in that if z is a snitch, that means I must be...
and as far as bkw being innocent... not on your life would I bet that, He could have seen where the night was going, and knew tha dawg would be as good as toast... and then taken out chill, that being the casem either way his plan would have gone, from the top or from the bottom, any of the people would would have investigated him would have been out of the game. Let's not forget it was rb who last voted for Dawg before the end of the night. RB Has not posted today though so he could very well be in solitary, reading his PM after he posted... BUT that could also mean that rb is simply playing mind games and keeping his mouth shut because he knows this is a good fall back role. Is this an RB way to do things, you bet your shorts, it is.
ok, so all you can retort is that I am mistaken from you being coached. As of now, bradt, NJ, and noodles have been the ones to claim they are simply playing the game and for whatever the reason, have decided maybe they should keep quiet for a while since they are always being accuesd. Sitting quiet for a while isn't very town like, especially when you have the disposal of posting during the day and nights.
as far as who I am suspicious of, still NJ, bradt and now noodles. I know the 2 are newbies and I would love to cut them some slack so as not to look so "hard at the newbies" and to make sure they "enjoy the game" but the game is the game. No one is off the platform as far as I am concerned.
Well, Z...last night I said "did you not protect BKW" I also said I would pull the post that made me wonder. Well that is what I did, that post made me think twice about you. You say you didn't "protect" BKW and no...you didn't outright...but you did say you saw him as innocent for "trying to bring us together" I think you may be squirming a bit here Z.Bkw1982
Zsandmann
Dangerdoll
IceH2O
Jm1212
Rbishop
Jpappy789
NeonJulie
Lady G
[AC] Tree_Hugger
noodles62
[AC] Doomsday998
Jbradt
BKW, pappy, and Rb have been nonexistant since night fall last night. I figure one of them may have been in solitary but my understanding is that only lasts 12 hours.
We've had more hooey discussion on how to use the invests but once again no real discussion of suspects (my fault as much as anyones).
The only people ringing around in my head right now are LG, noodles, and Doom. noodles I'm willing to let pass for now as its all newbie stuff and I just haven't figured her out yet. I do wish she would go back and carefully read through all the rules though. Doom wasn't even pinging my interest till the pyramid scheme business. I thought we spent the last 48 hours dealing with why we can't say who we investigate??? Last is LG and call it OMGUS if you like but the way she came after me with subtle brushes but no real thrust makes me curious. Also, she didn't show me where I defended BKW instead she tried to bend her arguement to other reasons I looked shady. And then said the same things about Rb. That's hypocracy by definition. I know she isn't the only one that has questioned me, I expect it, but she was the most indirectly direct and now suddenly me, BKW, and DD are a secret team to everyone.
I vote to shank LG.