Mafia #43 Bio Badlands #2

"You looka alive to me", said Bala.
 
Well, looks like I need to start all over. I must skim over all of the posts from 3L as I cannot go thru that again! Ugh! At the moment I have no idea who sticks out the most or looks suspicious. It really stinks that we lost DD, even tho I always have my doubts about her. LOL Two townies gone on night one is not a good way to start. I would like to say I am sorry about 3L but in all honesty, I cannot..........
 
I'll admit that I didn't read the rules this time around. I figured it would be a copy of the last bio badlands game, which I assumed was no vote = UD. My fault...interesting though that LG voted Zsand because of a weak reason because she didn't know if she would be back and yet I don't remember you commenting on it...but I guess that's different, right?

Then I misinterpreted your post but pretty much the same central reason as mine, you didn't want to UD. I don't see why mad commented on mine (and Jmax's vote for that matter) over the other seemingly random votes of last night.

Here's the thing, Jpap... I have no problem with anyone casting a seemingly random vote early enough on Day 1. Sometimes random votes can apply a little pressure, and therefore stimulate real discussion early in the game. Most of those folks voting 'randomly' end up changing their votes (or at least eventually giving more real reasons) before nightfall.

There is a problem, though, when someone casts a random vote and admits that they're willing to ride it all the way to nightfall. It's a scumbag move that says that the person is willing to have anyone killed off, as long as it's not them. You obviously knew that this was a bad move, as you referred to having to fight about it later, so why are you acting so surprised now?
 
Well, looks like I need to start all over. I must skim over all of the posts from 3L as I cannot go thru that again! Ugh! At the moment I have no idea who sticks out the most or looks suspicious. It really stinks that we lost DD, even tho I always have my doubts about her. LOL Two townies gone on night one is not a good way to start. I would like to say I am sorry about 3L but in all honesty, I cannot..........

Skim + Confused + Awww Shucks + LOL + Obvious + Meh = Mafia

I vote to genetically test Noodles
 
Skim + Confused + Awww Shucks + LOL + Obvious + Meh = Mafia

I vote to genetically test Noodles

Your reasoning for your votes this game seems a bit odd.....
Kinda sends up a few flags. :irked:
 
Hey, Huggie one!!!!!!!!

Ya know I'm always up for a good fight, promise, pledge..:rolleyes:

That's only because you like making up afterwards. :naughty:


I hate that we took out a townie, but if one had to go... we definitely could have lost someone more important.

I'm really curious about the choice to take DD out. She's usually a good player to leave around since she does bicker and always seems a bit suspicious. I think either she questioned one of the evils or one or more got cozy with her and they hope to avoid suspicion by looking as if they were close to her. I'm going to read through all her interactions before I cast a vote.
 
Well, If I had to vote based on changed game play and style, I would have to vote one of three people.
Myself, LG, and HN.

I know my reasoning, is that i Actually have some time to play and be more vocal, which is not my usual MO.

so, G, and HN, why are you two playing so drastically different?
 
OMG, sometimes I really wonder what the heck some of you are thinking when you vote...I can't believe ya'll took out a player that was actually posting and entertaining as well...WOW, all I can say right now.

Dawg, so who were the SEVERAL ppl I was accusing last night I think I said something about Z and DD in a joke way..and I picked on you a bit for fun...so where was on one several?

Is 3 or 4 people out of 13 suspects several or a few? Either way it was more than one so I was suspicious. It's night 1 so I didn't have much to go on. I didn't wan't to vote 3L just for the annoyance factor because we have played with annoying people before.

Now some suspicions have come to light since last night. Noodles and Z are standing out to me because they both seemed like they were trying to be perceived as being close with DD. Then DD gets knocked off by the Evils and they are in the clear. Now perhaps they are distancing with their more recent posts although the early vote on Noodles is a risky move if they are in cahoots. Z seems a little more suspect to me because of this post...

I want to say something like, dang hate that we lost a townie, but all I can muster is a "meh."

DD was an interesting target for the evils to choose, I suspect it was just to through all of 3Ls "insight" to the birds. Not that I think many would follow it up too much.

No UDs, I'm glad but also interested how that is going to work out.

His "meh" comment bothered me at first but I see some others felt it wasn't such a bad thing to lose 3L even though he was a townie. Then I notice he's discounting 3L's comments because DD was in fact innocent (totally understandable due to 3L's posting style). Then it made me wonder if Z is trying to cover for Noodles who was also mentioned by 3L. For now I vote to genetically test Z.

I am on the fence with these two so if my vote is needed I could also be persuaded to change to Noodles at this point.
 
Well, If I had to vote based on changed game play and style, I would have to vote one of three people.
Myself, LG, and HN.

I know my reasoning, is that i Actually have some time to play and be more vocal, which is not my usual MO.

so, G, and HN, why are you two playing so drastically different?

I've been traveling alot and otherwise distracted. And you know why... ;) I'm headed out again Friday so either get used to me posting less or kill me off. I'll make sure not to UD and I'll be active while home, but no other promises.
 
AquariaCentral.com