Mafia 50/50 The play..back to Basics..almost

This made me laugh. Of course I am pointing fingers....at the people I am suspicious of! :duh: In case you did not notice I actually voted for one the ones I pointed at too! :eek3:

Do you have anything constructive to add to this game?

OOps! Should say "voted for one of the players"
 
Below is a list of how many posts who has made so far. No, it doesnt say the content of the thread, but I think everyone will get the picture that zig, wingnut and kashta are the Bottom three posters.


noodles62 92
johnlarson66 60
The Red Severum 43
Luvbugz 40
cjtabares 37
Dangerdoll 33
Blueiz 29
Rbisho 22
rich311 22
Kashta 21

[AC] wing nut 21
The Zigman 17

Blue, if you felt it necessary to use the caveat that your post count list "doesn't say the content of the thread," it kind of makes the list somewhat irrelavant doesn't it?

Deflect much?
 
(This next quote was addressed to LuvBugs.)



The whole objective of this game is to accuse and grill the players to root out mafia. They just dont go around leaving signs and hints. I understand that we have a few new players and I think it is great. Now get involved and try to find the scum; defending others is not gonna accomplish that.........I really want to see more from a few players.

Exactly right. And I hope LuvBugs will start doing this too (for a change).


You tend to forget that Noodles voted for DD who was an INNOCENT. Maybe she needs to take her own advice. Why are you so buddy buddy with Noodles all the sudden Kash?

Blueiz and John: WTH is all this bickering crap about? I am getting a bunch of posts from you guys about a whole lotta nothing.

AC: I did FINALLY figure out why everyone was voting for CJ. Too many posts about mispelling led me to believe it was all about a mispelling. Now that I reread EVERYTHING the whole italized post with misspelling still in it is what is suspect. I get it, but I am still not quick to jump. It does look very bad.
 
(This next quote was addressed to LuvBugs.)



The whole objective of this game is to accuse and grill the players to root out mafia. They just dont go around leaving signs and hints. I understand that we have a few new players and I think it is great. Now get involved and try to find the scum; defending others is not gonna accomplish that.........I really want to see more from a few players.

Exactly right. And I hope LuvBugs will start doing this too (for a change).


You tend to forget that Noodles voted for DD who was an INNOCENT. Maybe she needs to take her own advice. Why are you so buddy buddy with Noodles all the sudden Kash?

Blueiz and John: WTH is all this bickering crap about? I am getting a bunch of posts from you guys about a whole lotta nothing.

AC: I did FINALLY figure out why everyone was voting for CJ. Too many posts about mispelling led me to believe it was all about a mispelling. Now that I reread EVERYTHING the whole italized post with misspelling still in it is what is suspect. I get it, but I am still not quick to jump. It does look very bad.

so did two others, funny how you are not questioning them on their vote....(BTW, it's dawg not DD - DD is Dangerdoll)

more on you later....I have to get back to my meeting........
 
(This next quote was addressed to LuvBugs.)

The whole objective of this game is to accuse and grill the players to root out mafia. They just dont go around leaving signs and hints. I understand that we have a few new players and I think it is great. Now get involved and try to find the scum; defending others is not gonna accomplish that.........I really want to see more from a few players.

Exactly right. And I hope LuvBugs will start doing this too (for a change).

LuvBugz, you can't be serious. Please do yourself a favor and re-read that segment. You've completely missed the point. You got yourself into the same problem yesterday and this lead to 3 pages of debate about one post that got pasted in instead of being typed out from scratch.

You tend to forget that Noodles voted for DD who was an INNOCENT. Maybe she needs to take her own advice. Why are you so buddy buddy with Noodles all the sudden Kash?.

Here again, you've got it all wrong. (1) Noodles voted for Dangerdoll. (2) Dirtydawg is the innocent who got lynched. (3) Dangerdoll is still alive and kicking.

When a person (me) isolates one remark posted by someone (in this case noodles) and agrees with that single comment out of a bazillion other statements she made... that is not an alliance. And it doesn't make anyone innocent or affiliated with the mafia. To make this clear for you, consider this.
Noodles said this to you (which is what I highlighted in red):

1. The objective is to root out mafia.
2. Get involved.
3. Find the scum.

She went on to add this.

4. Defending others isn't going to accomplish that.
As that post by noodles was directed toward you (as being helpful advice to someone who seemed to be getting sidetracked) that shows MORE that Noodles was trying to help you than anything else. This is because you kept jumping in to complain about people who were pointing fingers and you defended a vast number of people who got accused of something, regardless of WHAT that something was.

So now.. of those 4 helpful hints from noodles that I've listed above, which statement do you disagree with? As an example.. if you agree with the 3rd item that we're supposed to find the scum... does THAT place YOU in cahoots with noodles? Give me a break.

AC: I did FINALLY figure out why everyone was voting for CJ. Too many posts about mispelling led me to believe it was all about a mispelling. Now that I reread EVERYTHING the whole italized post with misspelling still in it is what is suspect. I get it, but I am still not quick to jump. It does look very bad.

Holy crap, let's not get into that again.
 
Noodles voted for DirtyDawg. Sorry I get all confused on the little abbrevations of everyone. DirtyDawg was an innocent. Get your facts straight Kash.
 
Wow do you guys have me confused. Lots of fingers in all directions.

Bugz I cant figure if your scum or just don't get it.

Red you have me worried. You set your teeth and don't drop little points. Almost like you are trying to keep us distracted from real questions.

Blue, kashta seem to be looking in the bushes for clues. Like they should be.

The rest of you just drop by once in a while and say boo.

I will stick with my vote for the time being. We shall see.
 
to lynch...


zig jl66 324

cjt WN 351 rich 354

bugz nood 375

nood red 391

kash cjt 432


Nightfall, Day 2, at 9 PM edt, Wed, 05/20...

really was contemplating voting cj today instead of Noods, which was my first thought from yesterday..... but now that I see Rich on cj, I am not sure...

Backtracking again here.. forgive me, I'm probably going to do a lot of that today.

DD.. I'd like to know something about this statement. Did you actually intend to say that (at that time) you wanted to vote for CJT... then you noticed a second vote had been made against him so yours would have made it 3... and THIS fact is what changed your mind? If that's true, are you only planning to vote against someone if they don't have a chance of getting killed?
 
Johnlarson.. I'll address this to you since you were the first person I saw who posted a listing of names showing postcount in this thread. Please tell me what difference this makes and why it was so important to point out these numbers. Seriously, I don't follow the relevance to this and it's being brought out now like it's some important tidbit of information we're supposed to take into account.
 
Wow do you guys have me confused. Lots of fingers in all directions.

Bugz I cant figure if your scum or just don't get it.

Red you have me worried. You set your teeth and don't drop little points. Almost like you are trying to keep us distracted from real questions.

Blue, kashta seem to be looking in the bushes for clues. Like they should be.

The rest of you just drop by once in a while and say boo.

I will stick with my vote for the time being. We shall see.

Including yourself, right?!
 
AquariaCentral.com