Mafia 50/50 The play..back to Basics..almost

[Kashta]

I'm waiting now to hear what john has to say. In the meantime, TRS, this is too important for us to leave to chance..... there are too many mafia players here for us to take risks (especially if RBishop gets cantankerous).

I understand that, and such for that.
I vote to lynch johnlawson

^^ You need to post this again so you can change the lawson part to larson.

 

[The Zigman]

I vote to lynch the zigman

he already voted for me...

 

[johnlarson66]

right, I got it now, Why would he vote to lynch another confirmed innocent if he was one, like he claims...

Well John?

It was day one.

V2K had no chance of getting lynched. Plus we had not even heard from him yet, I posted a vote for the low poster, but then saw that v2k had never even posted once.

This might be hard to understand, but sometimes members of the same communicating team will vote for each other to distance themselves.

I am what I claim to be, but since the other communicating innocents are dead - I have no one to communicate with. I do get to take out one of them.

 

[johnlarson66]

TRS, I was communicating with noods, I have not switched sides.

If you want to vote with the mafia, then do so. I am not mafia, I am a communicating innocent with no one to communicate with.

I am taking someone out, the mafia will be taking someone out - but before all that the town gets to lynch someone.

I think it should be The Zigman. If Rich wants to vote for someone else, I will keep an open mind. I don't trust anyone else besides Rich and from this point on I will answer his questions only, the rest of you can show your innocence by following us.

 

[Kashta]

he already voted for me...

Yes I know, Zig. After that, he decided to change his vote to johnlarson... or tried to, anyway... after questioning me.

That is interesting Wing, really puts this all in doubt. What have you got to say John?

Noodles obviously spoke with John. She said so. We are debating whetheror not JL is what he says he is.

I vote to lynch the zigman

Now all that stuff in the beginning makes better sense. There was a switch in place already... Bala doesn't have to issue one. RBishop did it already when he brought TRS into the game.

I didn't pay much attention to the odd player factor in a 50/50 game in the first pages because I couldn't figure it out. But do the math now...

If TRS is innocent, then johnlarson is lying.

That could be too Zigman. And look who he's pushing for to get lynched next.. Zigman. But I think TRS knows whether he's innocent or mafia.

JL what do you say to this!

john.....

I don't understand, care explain more?

Yes, TRS..... it means you are the key after all.

I didn't have the slightest idea in the beginning. But JL's so-called prediction about blueiz being taken out was an obvious guess IF JL was SURE that noodles was innocent... which we know he was now. Noodles could see she was already out of the game, so there's her chance to leave a parting shot behind for them both to giggle about as we continue to flounder with this.

When TRS was added, we all assumed he was just an extra innocent player. But somehow, JL knew otherwise. The only way he could even guess something like that from the first moments of the game is if he'd just received his own corresponding message from Bishop to switch him.

JL even told us so and then laughed it off later as a JOKE.

"rb is all about twists, so it is really hard to say what he did with TRS joining late."

And he's been playing this game exactly that was ever since.

TRS isn't the switch - johnlawson is... and he's known it from the start. TRS can tell this for himself if TRS is really innocent.

I understand that, and such for that.
I vote to lynch johnlawson

I vote to lynch JohnLarson66

 

[Kashta]

TRS... this is not going to work. You placed a second vote without saying you're changing it.

First vote here.

I vote to lynch the zigman

Revised vote here.

I understand that, and such for that.
I vote to lynch johnlawson

This is what you need to do. It's two steps, (1) say in bold you are changing it, and (2) say in bold what the vote becomes.

1) Each game day, everyone in the town (including mafia) can vote to lynch someone. You vote by saying (in bold)… I vote to lynch so and so.

b. If you decide to switch your vote, state in bold you are doing so and the new vote.

 

[The Red Severum]

Kashta, I know. Chill,
and since my second vote didn't count, I want to stick with zigman. (for now)
and john, can you find an error in there explanation about you? Because if you can, I will vote for zigman or if you can't I will change my vote to you... Don't let me down here JL

 

[Rbishop]

thru post 777....

to lynch....

jl66 WN 732 Kash 742 zig 770

zig jl 733 red 735 DD 740


no vote from rich......

 

[[AC] wing nut]

I went digging through the thread, and found something else of interest:

On Day 1, Luvbugs strongly accused Noodles and Blueiz of being mafia teammates.

This is where you were sticking up for Noods outta the blue when TRS first voted for her. You went after everyone claiming you don't trust anyone, but all the sudden defend Noodles and her "ipossible innocence". Right after I brought this to the town's attention both Noods and Blueiz go crazy slinging accusations at me. You two can sling whatever you want at me, but the fact remains. Blueiz stuck up for Noods. Noods voted for Blueiz to distance herself and throw us off. Now Noods is recanting her vote because her friend is in trouble.

Never said anyone but you and Blueiz have an alliance.

Here JL tries to help push Luv's theory about Noodles and Blue being communicating mafia. If JL were truly communicating with Noodles on Day 1, why would he have tried to link Noodles to any other players, especially to someone like Blue who was catching so much heat?

So Blue, are you now admitting you were protecting noods? Seems like Luv might be on to something.

 

[Rbishop]

Bala notes that someone in ACville has been offered a chance to switch sides......