Mafia 54:Vampires Return (The Play)

ZSandmann said:
Rb is only not included because I can never read Rb. He could be a vamp or a deranged townie quisling. Who knows?

I've gotta say Zaffy now takes a backseat to Rich and Pappy. Pappy was saved last night at Noodles expense, plain and simple. Rich and Rb were responsible for that both directly and indirectly. If they are Villagers they are doing nothing to help the town. But if Pappy is the LV then I could totally understand the effort by one or both of them. Rich's thing reminded me of NeonJulie's breakdown only less... estrogeneous. :footinmouth:

Another I am now interested in is Wycco. Keeps wanting a regurge of cases built against suspects. While I am certainly for adding new evidence as it is found, I do not repost cases once they are built. The posts are there for anyone who really wants to look for them.
Click to expand...

Please explain how I was "saved". The only time I was leading the vote was early yesterday morning with 3 votes on me...then after Rb switched, the votes piled on Noods really fast. After that Noods had at least 2 or 3 votes more than me the rest of the night if I am reading through correctly. Do you really think all those people were trying to save me?

jm1212 said:
pappy did lead the crusade against noods, and he also voted for DD and lead the train against her. both were known innocents.

i vote to stake jpappy

at least for right now.
Click to expand...

LOL, so you are now blaming me you your vote? Or did you conveniently forget that you also voted Noods on your own accord? How could I "lead the crusade" against noods when I voted 6th out of 9 votes on her? I had her as a suspect earlier but it was not until she started responding to questions when I began grilling her.

I also never led a train against DD, there was only three votes on her until she was killed because of Zaffy's selfish play. My vote was initially a joke anyways until I felt it was as good of a D1 vote as I could get.

Quit making things up Jm...

OgreMkV said:
Wycco, I don't think this is a case of being single-minded. I think this is a case of using previous evidence and the results of last night to focus on someone who I really think is a vamp. If you go back, I put in a case for Jpap... and it has most of his posts in it.

I think we got some real useful evidence last night and I, for one, don't want to see us waste noods death to not 'allow ourselves to be single-minded'.
Click to expand...
And in that case for me ended up voting for Jm.

You also put in a case for noods. Post #457.
 
lanimret said:
I'm not one to flip-flop, and I think Zaffy has done a very good job of allaying suspicion, which does not surprise me at all.

I vote to stake Zaffy

That said, I also suspect highly:

Jpap - Lot's of finger pointing, now very quiet. Looking for a new candidate to smear? Laying low to let suspicion die down?

Kashta - Similar to Jpap, fairly quiet recently. Possible turn and told to lay low. Or just a strategy shift.

Anyone who goes from talkative to silent usually means they have something to hide in my book.
Click to expand...
So I stop posting for exactly 11 hours and suddenly you suspect me?

Coming from a player who has less posts than the person lynched day one...
 
So here is what I am thinking.

LV-Jm-questioned Rich last night...distancing from a lesser vamp
Turn #1-JL-buddied up with noods as per Wycco's posts
Turn #2-Rich-everyone can read his posts, also said Jm was innocent at one point which I think was a poor attempt at distancing
Turn #3-? could be anyone as it had to be sent in early...only person I would rule out is Zaffy

With that I retract my vote on Rb and vote to stick a stake in Rich

I also see no reason for voting Zaffy (Rocker, Lan) at this point...could you guys please tell us why you are still stuck in the past?
 
lanimret said:
Yes, but I am consistent.
Click to expand...
LOL

Here's the timing of your 10 posts so far (yes, that is correct you only have 10 posts)

1) 8/15 @ 7:31 pm
2) 8/15 @ 7:33 pm
(over 24 hours later)
3) 8/17 @ 9:31 pm
(over 12 hours later)
4) 8/18 @ 3:03 pm
5) 8/18 @ 5:25 pm
6) 8/18 @ 5:33 pm
7) 8/18 @ 9:26 pm
8) 8/18 @ 11:52 pm
(over 24 hours later)
9) Today (8/20) @ 12:12 pm
10) Today (8/20) @ 12:45 pm

All times are eastern

So lan, what about this record is consistent?
 
jpappy789 said:
LOL

Here's the timing of your 10 posts so far (yes, that is correct you only have 10 posts)

1) 8/15 @ 7:31 pm
2) 8/15 @ 7:33 pm
(over 24 hours later)
3) 8/17 @ 9:31 pm
(over 12 hours later)
4) 8/18 @ 3:03 pm
5) 8/18 @ 5:25 pm
6) 8/18 @ 5:33 pm
7) 8/18 @ 9:26 pm
8) 8/18 @ 11:52 pm
(over 24 hours later)
9) Today (8/20) @ 12:12 pm
10) Today (8/20) @ 12:45 pm

All times are eastern

So lan, what about this record is consistent?
Click to expand...

they're all pm :rolleyes: (eastern)
 
Here is what I think

Rb - maybe so hard to build a case against.

Jpap - was loud in his charge on Noods, but so where many. Certainly a good candidate.

Jl - defended Noods, had a go at anyone who is willing to play. Another good candidate.

ZS - has me worried. Picking at easy wounds to look like he is trying but I am not so sure.

JM - ready to champion the cause of the moment, posts make little sense. I am changing his status to very likely.

Coler - cold and calculating, I wait to hear his next analysis, has me worried.

Rich - can certainly see why he is under suspicion after his temper tantrum last night. he has not voted for an innocent yet however. Still a hell of a guy.

kashta - I do not know what to think.

dawg always worries me but nothing to grab on to.

Anyone else I have not got anything to go on.
 
jpappy789 said:
LOL

Here's the timing of your 10 posts so far (yes, that is correct you only have 10 posts)

1) 8/15 @ 7:31 pm
2) 8/15 @ 7:33 pm
(over 24 hours later)
3) 8/17 @ 9:31 pm
(over 12 hours later)
4) 8/18 @ 3:03 pm
5) 8/18 @ 5:25 pm
6) 8/18 @ 5:33 pm
7) 8/18 @ 9:26 pm
8) 8/18 @ 11:52 pm
(over 24 hours later)
9) Today (8/20) @ 12:12 pm
10) Today (8/20) @ 12:45 pm

All times are eastern

So lan, what about this record is consistent?
Click to expand...

Was referring to voting consistency. I've stuck with my puck and I have yet to be proven wrong. You are all over the place.
 
rich311k said:
Here is what I think

Rb - maybe so hard to build a case against.

Jpap - was loud in his charge on Noods, but so where many. Certainly a good candidate.

Jl - defended Noods, had a go at anyone who is willing to play. Another good candidate.

ZS - has me worried. Picking at easy wounds to look like he is trying but I am not so sure.

JM - ready to champion the cause of the moment, posts make little sense. I am changing his status to very likely.

Coler - cold and calculating, I wait to hear his next analysis, has me worried.

Rich - can certainly see why he is under suspicion after his temper tantrum last night. he has not voted for an innocent yet however. Still a hell of a guy.

kashta - I do not know what to think.

dawg always worries me but nothing to grab on to.

Anyone else I have not got anything to go on.
Click to expand...

Nice list, I can almost tell who your suspects are. So who's the top candidate?

You voted for noods yesterday even when you claimed she was an innocent in your mind...then you bailed last second after people started questioning you. Worried it would tarnish your voting record Rich?

Also, you said last night if Noods was innocent you would be voting me...so where is it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
AquariaCentral.com
Top Bottom