how come the thread says that there are 7 people viewing, but in here it says that there are only 2?
Of course the mafia can just decide to hit everyone, then if they die we still die too, cept innocents. Or is that against the rules?
He implied it, and its spelled EXPLAIN :headshake2:
For the seconed one, i noted that he was saying what the mafia would do and u overeacted and came in with a newb first meaningful post.
Quote by Dawg:
"Well FF is at it again.
Congates you can read.
How do you know this is a train JL has started? Do you plan to jump on?
I have stated b4 that it may have been a feeble attemt at starting a train on him.
Can you quote the post where JL says the mafia won't try to start a train on someone they know is innocent?? I don't see it posted before your post that claims he said that.
Done that
Why are you clarifying that WE don't know if JPap is innocent? Where did you claim JPap was innocent before? And now you clarify what JL said but how could you ever interpret what JL said in his posts as "the mafia won't try to start a train on someone they know is innocent"
I assumed that he was innocent (finished with that too) and that Jl was evil.
Did someone tell you, you screwed up or did you figure that out on your own?
For now unless something better comes along
I vote to lynch FF"
All in all, your very first real post was all about trying to kill me. That sounds like a plan for mafia. "Kill the village idiot, he cant do squat about it and will dig his own grave."
I think that you are either mafia of the village idiot, or just skimming my posts and trying build a feeble argument on them. The foundation for you argument sucks, therefor the argument will not last.
Is it possible to UD in this format? I assumed that by 'no lynch' you meant that you just didn't put any kind of vote out there. Mad could you please clarify?
As far as what FF has said (about me or really anything), it is hard to focus on any of it. In all seriousness, I keep hoping that FF would learn the game a little more and not just post to be posting. Until that happens he is mostly a distraction. I think he is fun to have around and can often be the center of attention, but the reality is that he is a distraction.
Those are my thoughts on FF.
Noted, and disagreed with. If we are all on 2 people then there is a much lower chance for them to be mafia. We should spread out, but not too much. Maybe 5 votes per person. That would make it 3 people a risk 5 votes each or around that.
Dawg, you're kicking awfully hard at FF and I can't really see why. From what I can tell, FF is being his typical, spastic self. He posts before he really thinks it through, then he has to repost to clarify, then he changes his mind, etc. But from what he's posted, nothing has struck me as exceptionally scummy. In fact, in his own little way, I think he's trying to help the town. His posts are more like last game, when he was innocent, rather than just throwing a bunch of stuff out there to purposely confuse, like he did the game before when he was mafia. You kicking so hard at him for his typical play (especially since it's how he played the last game as innocent) is sending up scum alerts in my head.
I'm also confused when you ask him if he's communicating outside...as I understand it, neither mafia nor masons can talk for day 1. So who would he be talking to/planning with?
For now, unless something better comes along...
I vote to lynch Dawg.
Heh, what I was talking about is the fact that there is no reason for the Mafia to let themselves be lynched. When things get overwhelmingly in their favor they can just start using their day kills until they hit a Townie. I would be surprised to see any Mafia actually end up on the final chopping block. It doesn't change my thoughts on voting early and often, it's just something we will have to expect.I don't understand this Z...you're afraid to lynch mafia scum? Would you prefer that innocents get lynched?
Heh I kind of put FF in the MeeMee and NJ school of play. Maybe add LesbianChap to that list. :grinyes:But if we're spread out its easier for the mafia to just vote on the innocent even if its only 1 player out of 5 on the block. And by stretching the vote to much I don't consider 3 to be stretching. I'm talking more about 4 or more.
Both sets of PRs got to talk for the 24 hours before the game started. If I'm correct they will also get to talk for 24 hours after each kill. Its one reason why I see no problem with dragging out days for lynching unless we get on some type of roll with mafia deaths. The longer we stretch out a day the less they get to talk and force them to talk out in the open.
I kind of like Zs idea to just randomly vote someone out just to get it started. FF comes to mind as a perfect canidate just so I can save on the aspirin bill.
:rofl:
Heh, what I was talking about is the fact that there is no reason for the Mafia to let themselves be lynched. When things get overwhelmingly in their favor they can just start using their day kills until they hit a Townie. I would be surprised to see any Mafia actually end up on the final chopping block. It doesn't change my thoughts on voting early and often, it's just something we will have to expect.
Heh I kind of put FF in the MeeMee and NJ school of play. Maybe add LesbianChap to that list. :grinyes:
I vote to lynch Tex. Where ya at?
Good point. I'm just wondering where FF heard that statement from JL because it's clearly not in this thread. It had to come from somewhere?? I don't think it was planned...I think it was a screw up.
They were able to communicate prior to the game. I have no problem with your vote but I do have a problem with you not being able to see FF's screw up. It seems so clear to me. JL said something and FF posted that JL was thinking something totally different. I'm wondering where that thought came from because...again...it didn't come from this thread but it came from somewhere.
Here it is again...
and again FF has totally side stepped the issue of where this actually came from. He has yet to answer this even though I've asked 3 or 4 times for him to clarify. Nothing JL said even remotely leads one to believe what FF states JL is saying. I'm not going to harp on it any more but my vote will stay where it is until FF comes up with a logical explanation.
I'm also wondering if JL has any thoughts on what FF says about JL.