Mafia 65: Masons and Mafia (Game Thread)

I missed Dag but I'll put him at the end of the list. I think he voted his conscience but was rushed for RL issues which you verified to be true. I don't think his reasoning is weak, FF can't change his style or we'd jump all over it. Reading his posts he is not answering questions straight forwardly. He is naming players innocent when he couldn't know that and he is voting with a suspect of his when he didn't need to be.
 
I missed Dag but I'll put him at the end of the list. I think he voted his conscience but was rushed for RL issues which you verified to be true. I don't think his reasoning is weak, FF can't change his style or we'd jump all over it. Reading his posts he is not answering questions straight forwardly. He is naming players innocent when he couldn't know that and he is voting with a suspect of his when he didn't need to be.

So then what does a consistent play style have to do with being scum?
 
Lab, does it not bother you that FF and Tex are on almost the exact same page...well, as close as one can get when it comes to FF...???

I'm going to give Tex the benefit of the doubt for now, with his noob card and all. I was wrong about him last game and I think he may have just voted to vote this game (he accidentally UD'ed last game) and I'm not sure he quite understands this games format with the way he's played...or not played. Whatever the reason, I'm not going to vote to lynch him at this moment unless he does something scummy. I would like to hear from him though.

I don't think anyone is in the same book, let alone on the same page, as FF... :rofl:

You and several others have a problem with me linking you and FF as a team. So what do you, JPap and LR think about FF linking me and you?? Isn't that multiple times more bizarre to you? I understand it is FF but people need to stop skimming and ignoring his posts. If it takes me being lynched for people to look at him then so be it.
I am simply remembering there are two communicating teams...one good, one evil. Glad you're willing to sacrifice yourself for the good of the town, very brave and noble of you. :rolleyes:
 
Last game Dawg was the Madman. Much more at stake for him if he got lynched so he laid low. This game he's got 4 other teammates with equal powers, it's not as big of a risk to his team for him to come out strong and try to get an innocent lynched. Now whether the scum team decided FF would be an easy lynch in their pre-game chat or if FF was just the first/easiest opportunity that presented itself, I don't know. The problem I have with Dag's vote is that he didn't give a solid reason for voting, seemed like some :bs: simply to get his vote out there (our grandpa really was in the hospital and Dag really is going down to Florida to help out IRL).

I don't have you leaning one way or another right now, Ice. From what I can tell, you seem to be pro-town in your posting and actively looking for scum. I'm not going to call you scummy mafia simply due to where your vote is placed at the moment. I'm looking at the content of your posts instead.

Razz has a history of laying low to avoid being picked as scum...he's doing it again so he is on my radar for that. DD also has me concerned with not adding much to the town except for some :nilly: on the FF/JL/Dawg thing.

I know this has nothing to do with a new game we are playing now but I just want to know. How was I laying low last game? I was the 4th highest poster in that game? I don't tend to lay low in any games.:huh:

I got a lot of innocents lynched last game...as a matter of fact all the lynches were innocents if I remember correctly. :Angel:

But that was last game and this is a new game so you are comparing apples and oranges. Most people never play the same game twice.

Your logic makes absolutely no sense here. If FF was such an easy target for why would I have to go after him? I'd sit back and let him get picked off by someone else. Which is possibly what the mafia is doing right now.
 
I don't want to focus too much on FF due the fact that he's playing like he did last game when he was indeed innocent, not like he did when he was scum the game prior. While I agree that if he's innocent he's not actually doing much to help the town, I think he really is trying to help the town. I think if he were mafia scum he'd be throwing out all sorts of crazy accusations, like he did two games ago.

I am glad people are focusing on you, Dawg. Your behavior towards FF has been quite scummy looking in my eyes. I think you and JL should be scrutinized. From what I can tell, JL did not react to FF's craziness until you brought it up. I see you making a mountain out of a molehill with that entire situation. It looked like JL was taking FF's word twisting with a grain of salt...you jumped in there and made a massive case out of it. Why are you trying so hard to get FF lynched? Do you indeed know he is an innocent? I would expect someone with as much experience in this game to not have made a production of FF's posts unless you had ulterior, evil motives.

This is where I disagree. Why would Dawg if Mafia need to go after FF. FF isn't a help to the town the way he posts,if anything he is an asset to the mafia. Given a few days would probably get himself lynched anyway.

I can't believe you put Tex at the bottom of your list. The fact that him and FF both posted the same suspects then both voted the same person with one of their suspects raises all kinds of red flags.
 
ok, what is the big repeat of "DD's posts are full of fluff", I think I've noticed it 3 times, not quite sure if there's been more? I have been giving my opinions on the events that are happening as I feel they are.... what makes my thoughts full of fluff and everyone else's so grand??
 
So then what does a consistent play style have to do with being scum?

I didn't say his play style makes him scum. A change in play style would lend credence to being scum.
 
Dawg, could you clarify your case on FF? It seems like you main beef with him is the fact that you believe he (FF) and JL are communicating. Is that correct? Was there anything other than that one post of FF's that I've already tried to clarify that lead you to believe that?
 
I don't want to focus too much on FF due the fact that he's playing like he did last game when he was indeed innocent, not like he did when he was scum the game prior. While I agree that if he's innocent he's not actually doing much to help the town, I think he really is trying to help the town. I think if he were mafia scum he'd be throwing out all sorts of crazy accusations, like he did two games ago.

I am glad people are focusing on you, Dawg. Your behavior towards FF has been quite scummy looking in my eyes. I think you and JL should be scrutinized. From what I can tell, JL did not react to FF's craziness until you brought it up. I see you making a mountain out of a molehill with that entire situation. It looked like JL was taking FF's word twisting with a grain of salt...you jumped in there and made a massive case out of it. Why are you trying so hard to get FF lynched? Do you indeed know he is an innocent? I would expect someone with as much experience in this game to not have made a production of FF's posts unless you had ulterior, evil motives.

You don't see FF throwing out crazy accusations this game????? He's already claimed JPap's innocence, then declared he never called JL mafia after he never said anything about JL being mafia but yet JL is his second suspect, then there is the posts with him putting words in JL's mouth, etc...etc...

I may have woken up in the twilight zone here or something.
 
I didn't say his play style makes him scum. A change in play style would lend credence to being scum.

Yet you say Dag's vote is cleared despite his whole case is that FF is playing like normal BUT he could be using that to "hide in the open." I understand thinking FF is scummy for all the things he's said in this game, but to say that he might be trying to post a lot to catch us off guard is completely irrelevant seeing as it's a complete hypothetical.
 
AquariaCentral.com