Hmmmm....being the 3rd vote has had a history of being the scummy one, however I find it alarming you have mentioned it, especially so early in the game.
I don't see any easy places to hide on the FF train. If he is innocent, he has made statements that are certainly contradictory to his actual role. If he is scumbag, I will trust noone that voted for him either, as his posts are almost all so slime covered that even the communicating scumbags must realize they will have to vote for him or risk exposing themselves. Some of them may have already

.
Very non committal, but overall you are implying FF is not a good lynch candidate because he always posts scummy things, even when he was innocent. Is this a fair assessment of this post?
Turning up the heat a little here. You state you would expect FF to play conservatively if he had a scum role? Is this your basis for your seemingly increasing defence of FF? Because he isn't playing conservatively?
So far, you have tried to talk Jpap and Lab out of voting for FF. Correct me if this is a misrepresentation of your posts.
He got some attention. At first I paid no attention to the crazy things he was posting. In the end we (Coler, Wiz and I) decided Dag was the best candidate for the lynch, based on the fact that we believed Dags early attack on FF was a scumbag looking for an easy target, which FF often makes of himself. In the end, I believed FF was just a crazy townie that had made some scummy posts and Dag was an opportunistic scumbag trying to exploit him.
He has my full attention now, and so does anyone trying to rationalize not voting for him at this point.
Care to name a suspect list?
What do you think of JB's and JL's posts so far in relation to you? I think they are both scumbags, but that of course dependent upon you being a scumbag.
My vote isnt set in stone FF. If you find a better suspect, and build a case, I could be swayed. But the fact is its D1, there is an abscence of good information and you are the best (and only) option on the table I can see. If you are innocent, you better find me a better option. Good luck with that.
That being said I'm tempted to move my vote to one of the non existent players, like Noods or Rich for example. Maybe they only post when they see their names in bold? Seems a little unfair not to consider them for a lynchin' just because they haven't said diddly as of yet dontcha think?
FF maybe you should kick one of their doors in. They seem pretty scummy for having said nothing at all.