Going by that interpretation, he should have been killed off way earlier, when I asked him if he was role claiming and he said yes.
Mafia #67 - 50/50 -- The Play
- Thread starter dirtydawg10
- Start date
Going by that interpretation, he should have been killed off way earlier, when I asked him if he was role claiming and he said yes.
He didn't just claim innocent though, he's specifying NCI. I think he should have been killed off if truly NCI (not that that helps the town any). I think it confirms that he is scum of some sort since he is still alive.
That begs the question though...what is? The mafia aren't going to RC as such so if you can claim NCI then the only role you cannot claim is CI? Kinda weird, but hopefully Dawg clarifies what's going on.
johnlarson66
These Pandas Rock
Very early on FF mentioned it was spring break and he was going to do mass posting. Lab replied and then FF posted this -
Now he is trying to re-write his own history.
I also stated that I thought the FF's vote on Lab was not OMGUS, because Lab had not voted for FF yet and there were two others that had voted FF. Of course while I was posting that, FF said his vote on Lab was OMGUSy and retracted. Then he claims his vote was not OMGUSy based on statements I had made.
While I am unsure if FF is mafia or just inept, I am concerned about his revisionist look at his own statements.
I also think it was clearly defined in the game not to role claim, while I am unsure if non-communicating innocent is a "role", I think it serves no purpose.
I am unwilling to be one of the last two votes on FF, but I am willing to take my vote off of Lab.
I retract my vote on Lab_Rat and vote to lynch Dagamoth.
Dagamoth's vote is mostly for how FF played last game. Not a random vote, but a revenge vote. I expect more from them.
My other suspects are noods (confused card) and JB (keeping mafia alive is good for the town).
Now he is trying to re-write his own history.
I also stated that I thought the FF's vote on Lab was not OMGUS, because Lab had not voted for FF yet and there were two others that had voted FF. Of course while I was posting that, FF said his vote on Lab was OMGUSy and retracted. Then he claims his vote was not OMGUSy based on statements I had made.
While I am unsure if FF is mafia or just inept, I am concerned about his revisionist look at his own statements.
I also think it was clearly defined in the game not to role claim, while I am unsure if non-communicating innocent is a "role", I think it serves no purpose.
I am unwilling to be one of the last two votes on FF, but I am willing to take my vote off of Lab.
I retract my vote on Lab_Rat and vote to lynch Dagamoth.
Dagamoth's vote is mostly for how FF played last game. Not a random vote, but a revenge vote. I expect more from them.
My other suspects are noods (confused card) and JB (keeping mafia alive is good for the town).
johnlarson66
These Pandas Rock
I don't see how killing off an innocent is any good for the town. I am also unsure if NCI is a "role". I think FF is doing a good job of hanging himself and does not need to be MOD killed at this point.
BTW, I am the Doctor.
I don't see how killing off an innocent is any good for the town. I am also unsure if NCI is a "role". I think FF is doing a good job of hanging himself and does not need to be MOD killed at this point.
BTW, I am the Doctor.
Yes, I agree, I do not want him killed off if he's a townie.
BTW, I am a Doctor irl
Does that scare you?
johnlarson66
These Pandas Rock
Yes, I agree, I do not want him killed off if he's a townie.
BTW, I am a Doctor irl
Depends, are you half naked & half drunk?
:lol2:
