I'm glad you asked JB this question as I was about to also. It bothered me in the same way that Lab was trying to say we learn something from FF if he is mafia but not if he is innocent.
Now I must ask why didn't you ask Lab the same question if it was important enough to ask JB.
Again this leads me to ask, why haven't you asked Lab the same question.
Uhhh, I was responding directly to JB's posts...why aren't you asking these questions of Noodles and Tank?
And I although I don't agree with Lab_Rat on learning more depending on FF's alignment, I'm pretty sure I understand what she's saying...
FF has been the scummiest player so far... You agree or you wouldn't have put your vote there, right? Also, it's a 50/50, so scum is only a coin flip away.
FF has said some scummy things (the most scummy of anyone) AND hitting scum randomly is almost a coin flip away. There's a pretty good darn chance that FF is scum, right?
So in a 50/50 with equal teams, who would be the least willing to lynch someone that seems scummy (regardless of any and all logic posed to them)? SCUM, that's who... Contrary to your earlier statement that scum would actually cut FF loose in an effort to blend in. It's a 50/50 where players are simply trying to find the alignment of their team mates. No blending necessary for scumbags.
So regardless of FF's alignment upon lynching, anyone defending FF has a pretty good chance of being scum.
Now back to Lab's statement... I think if FF flips scum it'll be easier for the innocent side to proceed, not necessarily that more will have been learned...
Or Dawg knows FF isn't that bright and feels bad for him.
I took that rule to mean you can't claim any role. So to say he isn't that one thing isn't correct either.The rule doesn't say you can't claim your role.
If Dawg feels its a violation he should take him down.
Agreed. But having been a mod myself, I'm willing to let Dawg go with the spirit of the game as he intended....and not the rules as written
