Mafia #70: The Time Vortex

Sorry for not getting back to you sooner Mad, rounds started and I'm just now getting lunch. The post of Noods' I was referring to about Ogre's aggressiveness was the one she posted this morning at 8:38 cst. I don't know which number cuz the mobile skins don't tell you. As far as me saying Ogre is suspicious but then voting alongside him, that can be explained by the following: I wonder if Ogre was the turn and discovered Zs is really his scum buddy. He started to back off, then got called on it. When Zs flips scum most likely the attitude will be that Ogre has gotta be innocent. Great way to hide. I really don't think scum would have had that strong initial push that Ogre had against Zs before this past nightfall.

Posted on mobile.aquariacentral.com
 
Sorry Ginger.

Welcome back Rich.

I will post more after work tonight, after I have more carefully read through some things.

I will not waste any time speculating who they may or may not have turned. Anyone I had leaning innocent yesterday (RB or Mad for example) is now reset to the neutral position and the hunt for scum begins anew.

I vote to lynch ZS.

Notice the part in red on Charlie's last post. This was almost 20hrs ago that it was posted :huh:
 
Notice the part in red on Charlie's last post. This was almost 20hrs ago that it was posted :huh:


another one MIA! what is up with this? does the time vortex have a black hole in it that sucks players to another dimension for a while? :hypnotized:
 
Was there a spell to make someone silent?
 
ZS, if you could have turned someone, you would have turned FF or Lab?

Did you really say that?
Yes, you wouldn't expect me to choose one of them which is exactly why I'd do it. They just need numbers, they don't have to be rocket surgeons :duh: But that is WIFOM and all.
another one MIA! what is up with this? does the time vortex have a black hole in it that sucks players to another dimension for a while? :hypnotized:

Science.
 
another one MIA! what is up with this? does the time vortex have a black hole in it that sucks players to another dimension for a while? :hypnotized:

I wouldnt put it past Jpappy to do this...
 
Sorry for not getting back to you sooner Mad, rounds started and I'm just now getting lunch. The post of Noods' I was referring to about Ogre's aggressiveness was the one she posted this morning at 8:38 cst. I don't know which number cuz the mobile skins don't tell you. As far as me saying Ogre is suspicious but then voting alongside him, that can be explained by the following: I wonder if Ogre was the turn and discovered Zs is really his scum buddy. He started to back off, then got called on it. When Zs flips scum most likely the attitude will be that Ogre has gotta be innocent. Great way to hide. I really don't think scum would have had that strong initial push that Ogre had against Zs before this past nightfall.

Posted on mobile.aquariacentral.com

I've also considered the possibility that Ogre was the turn. There's a lot of possible scenarios. Who knows?

At any rate what I found more odd was that you voted with him and then said "I hope that you're right." The fact that you said "you" instead of "we" struck me as odd.
 
I've also considered the possibility that Ogre was the turn. There's a lot of possible scenarios. Who knows?

At any rate what I found more odd was that you voted with him and then said "I hope that you're right." The fact that you said "you" instead of "we" struck me as odd.

This makes me nervous. It seems like your trying to spread confusion.
 
As far as I'm concerned, the merit of this babbling vial theory boils down to two considerations.

1. What exactly is one instructed to do (especially in that previous game) if the mod tells them they're supposed to babble? I haven't been in a role yet where I was told to babble and I don't remember that happening in a game I've played. (Well, Coler did get weird singing Al Jolson songs in the nude once. But that was normal for him. lol.) I've seen a town drunk that was killed right away. All that meant was he'd possibly "witness" something while impaired so his information was doutbful. I've also seen where someone was blackmailed by another where he had to vote someone specific. We've had various other spoiler roles too... assorted serial killers, renegades, vigilantes, etc.

If DD was babbling now, would she just post something not was true? Is it intended to be something self-incriminating? Or would she post something non-sensical? I don't remember if that vial was used in the badlands game or not (it not being one of my favorites) and I'm not going to have time to read another game today. If someone could answer this for me, I'd appreciate it.

2. Whether or not Pappy mentioned this just to mess with us. From what I've seen, Pappy seems to be most accurate with us when he tells us who died/didn't die, how, and by whom. We've also seen he does report when someone is turned. I think where he messes with us the most and is confusing/mysterious is while describing the new game format he's using for a new day. Example: Going into the badlands format, he hinted about blue mist on the horizon. Yet there was no blue mist come nightfall.

At this point, I'm discounting the babbling vial theory in DD's case because the case presented against her seems reasonable enough without it (IMO)... because I don't know if that's how a babbling role is manifested in someone's posting... because it seems a stretch for us to assume Pappy was trying to mislead there instead of clarify... because the fish/RAT code word theory was proved wrong... and because Pappy's comment is more simply explained by saying that was him telling us someone neglected to send him a PM or they told him they'd rather not use that vial.

If I remeber correctly....I gave them a post to make as the babble....
 
AquariaCentral.com