Mafia 72-Vampires game thread

so you would rather have two supposed townies dead then one that is a possible UD?

I would rather votes to be worth it, and not just wasted on a UDer.
 
I didnt catch this before but I find the bolded part above curious. I am not seeing it at all. I agree that 2H seems to be playing well, but do not see that he is emulating Kash. :huh:


I guess, when reading posts in a mafia game, I attribute certain things to certain players, ..and usually at nightfall night one, i can pretty much read the thread, and not have to look at who is actually posting, and still know ..Dag, kash, and 2H, all have a very similar speech, type pattern, ..actually, several times, i confused all three..

I went over some posts, and I do feel that Kash was kinda defending 2H, and I honestly, ..wasn't expecting the train so quick on cash.

I had pretty much decided my vote would go to kash, when i saw I ce had voted kash. In all the games, i have played with him, he is usually pretty **** good at picking the bad guy, which, just kinda upped my suspicion.

my biggest issue, was deciding who was more apt to be quoting for 2H..dag, or kash, ..I chose kash..///maybe its just me and the way i think?..

i AM NOT COMFORTABLE WITH A 4 WAY TIE.

thats stupid, ..we have a very limited time, to rty and find a bad guy, ..can we atleast agree on a 2 way tie?..

I am willing to change my vote if I have to, but my gut feeling is screaming i am right. ( NOT SAYING I AM, JUST SAYING SOMETHINGS NOT RIGHT IN WONDERLAND THERE.)

so. can we tighten up this mess?..we have basically one fourth of the players up?..thats kinda retarded..
 
I guess, when reading posts in a mafia game, I attribute certain things to certain players, ..and usually at nightfall night one, i can pretty much read the thread, and not have to look at who is actually posting, and still know ..Dag, kash, and 2H, all have a very similar speech, type pattern, ..actually, several times, i confused all three..

I went over some posts, and I do feel that Kash was kinda defending 2H, and I honestly, ..wasn't expecting the train so quick on cash.

I had pretty much ALREADY decided my vote would go to kash, when i saw I ce had voted kash. In all the games, i have played with him, he is usually pretty **** good at picking the bad guy, which, just kinda upped my suspicion.

my biggest issue, was deciding who was more apt to be quoting for 2H..dag, or kash, ..I chose kash..///maybe its just me and the way i think?..

i AM NOT COMFORTABLE WITH A 4 WAY TIE.

thats stupid, ..we have a very limited time, to rty and find a bad guy, ..can we atleast agree on a 2 way tie?..

I am willing to change my vote if I have to, but my gut feeling is screaming i am right. ( NOT SAYING I AM, JUST SAYING SOMETHINGS NOT RIGHT IN WONDERLAND THERE.)

so. can we tighten up this mess?..we have basically one fourth of the players up?..thats kinda retarded..

i wanted to add already in that spot where its red. I dont want anyone assuming, that i based my decision on Ices vote..
 
so you would rather have two supposed townies dead then one that is a possible UD?

Supposed? How so?

I was wondering the same thing myself....

Well, I will Retract my vote to stake Kashta, now rather then wait...........I will try to have a vote (final?) shortly.

Sorry Labby, guess you get to really earn your keep tonite! ;)
 
I find myself agreeing with judge, we need to lower the number of possibilities. The only issue with that is then scum get another chance to target us. I would rather the votes stay where they are then scum get another chance at "staking" a townie. As it is, each person up has a 25% chance of death. Not as big as a 50% chance.
 
Noods, you are now officialy a wild card.
 
I guess, when reading posts in a mafia game, I attribute certain things to certain players, ..and usually at nightfall night one, i can pretty much read the thread, and not have to look at who is actually posting, and still know ..Dag, kash, and 2H, all have a very similar speech, type pattern, ..actually, several times, i confused all three..

I went over some posts, and I do feel that Kash was kinda defending 2H, and I honestly, ..wasn't expecting the train so quick on cash.

I had pretty much decided my vote would go to kash, when i saw I ce had voted kash. In all the games, i have played with him, he is usually pretty **** good at picking the bad guy, which, just kinda upped my suspicion.

my biggest issue, was deciding who was more apt to be quoting for 2H..dag, or kash, ..I chose kash..///maybe its just me and the way i think?..

i AM NOT COMFORTABLE WITH A 4 WAY TIE.

thats stupid, ..we have a very limited time, to rty and find a bad guy, ..can we atleast agree on a 2 way tie?..

I am willing to change my vote if I have to, but my gut feeling is screaming i am right. ( NOT SAYING I AM, JUST SAYING SOMETHINGS NOT RIGHT IN WONDERLAND THERE.)

so. can we tighten up this mess?..we have basically one fourth of the players up?..thats kinda retarded..

I find myself agreeing with judge, we need to lower the number of possibilities. The only issue with that is then scum get another chance to target us. I would rather the votes stay where they are then scum get another chance at "staking" a townie. As it is, each person up has a 25% chance of death. Not as big as a 50% chance.


OK, but with votes so spread out, it will be **** near impossible to tell anything from voting ...

we need to eliminate atleast one person from there, ..a 3 way tie is not as bad, but one bad guy with a 4 way tie, can eliminate a townie..


One vampire, with votes spread that thin...

we need to unite a little here folks ...grab your crucifix, and your garlic, your holy water, ..and start checking your neighbors...

lets narrow this down some
 
sorry about my double quote, ..when i clicked multi quote earlier, it didnt carry over..it must have this time.

I am still having some internet issues...and my pages freeze, then work, and my internet drops, then resumes..
 
AquariaCentral.com