so you would rather have two supposed townies dead then one that is a possible UD?
I would rather votes to be worth it, and not just wasted on a UDer.
so you would rather have two supposed townies dead then one that is a possible UD?
I didnt catch this before but I find the bolded part above curious. I am not seeing it at all. I agree that 2H seems to be playing well, but do not see that he is emulating Kash. :huh:
I guess, when reading posts in a mafia game, I attribute certain things to certain players, ..and usually at nightfall night one, i can pretty much read the thread, and not have to look at who is actually posting, and still know ..Dag, kash, and 2H, all have a very similar speech, type pattern, ..actually, several times, i confused all three..
I went over some posts, and I do feel that Kash was kinda defending 2H, and I honestly, ..wasn't expecting the train so quick on cash.
I had pretty much ALREADY decided my vote would go to kash, when i saw I ce had voted kash. In all the games, i have played with him, he is usually pretty **** good at picking the bad guy, which, just kinda upped my suspicion.
my biggest issue, was deciding who was more apt to be quoting for 2H..dag, or kash, ..I chose kash..///maybe its just me and the way i think?..
i AM NOT COMFORTABLE WITH A 4 WAY TIE.
thats stupid, ..we have a very limited time, to rty and find a bad guy, ..can we atleast agree on a 2 way tie?..
I am willing to change my vote if I have to, but my gut feeling is screaming i am right. ( NOT SAYING I AM, JUST SAYING SOMETHINGS NOT RIGHT IN WONDERLAND THERE.)
so. can we tighten up this mess?..we have basically one fourth of the players up?..thats kinda retarded..
so you would rather have two supposed townies dead then one that is a possible UD?
Supposed? How so?
Noods, you are now officialy a wild card.
I guess, when reading posts in a mafia game, I attribute certain things to certain players, ..and usually at nightfall night one, i can pretty much read the thread, and not have to look at who is actually posting, and still know ..Dag, kash, and 2H, all have a very similar speech, type pattern, ..actually, several times, i confused all three..
I went over some posts, and I do feel that Kash was kinda defending 2H, and I honestly, ..wasn't expecting the train so quick on cash.
I had pretty much decided my vote would go to kash, when i saw I ce had voted kash. In all the games, i have played with him, he is usually pretty **** good at picking the bad guy, which, just kinda upped my suspicion.
my biggest issue, was deciding who was more apt to be quoting for 2H..dag, or kash, ..I chose kash..///maybe its just me and the way i think?..
i AM NOT COMFORTABLE WITH A 4 WAY TIE.
thats stupid, ..we have a very limited time, to rty and find a bad guy, ..can we atleast agree on a 2 way tie?..
I am willing to change my vote if I have to, but my gut feeling is screaming i am right. ( NOT SAYING I AM, JUST SAYING SOMETHINGS NOT RIGHT IN WONDERLAND THERE.)
so. can we tighten up this mess?..we have basically one fourth of the players up?..thats kinda retarded..
I find myself agreeing with judge, we need to lower the number of possibilities. The only issue with that is then scum get another chance to target us. I would rather the votes stay where they are then scum get another chance at "staking" a townie. As it is, each person up has a 25% chance of death. Not as big as a 50% chance.
Supposed? How so?