Mafia 72-Vampires game thread

[Dagamoth]

While I agree a FF turn would be pure genius. The risk/reward is to great. Now couple that with the fact I would almost rather lose without him than win with him, and I say I'm not at a place I fell comfortable with that scenario.

I have been kind of holding off on this, but now maybe the time. Anyone else got a bad feeling about Chill's participation today? I only caught one post, which was something along the lines of Wiz's babble.

I have been thinking about that too but I have also been taking into consideration that chill might have to work. Now that we are getting into evening if we don't see anything or or seeing something suspect that I feel we could hold against. But I just want to make sure that I'm not looking at a lack of participation as a bad thing when it could very easily be they were at work.

 

[Dagamoth]

it is saturday isn't it... hrm....

 

[Dagamoth]

Right, but you're at the same time calling the vamp team risk-takers and suggesting that they pulled the ultra-conservative "let's turn FF" move.

Is it really ultra conservative after all of yesterday trying to implicate him? If you look at nightfall after Kashta was staked, within 5 minutes of each other wiz and ice both voted for FF.

 

[jbradt]

Is it really ultra conservative after all of yesterday trying to implicate him? If you look at nightfall after Kashta was staked, within 5 minutes of each other wiz and ice both voted for FF.

IMO, yes. You're talking about a group of influential guys who WANT to have a say in the thread and influence people. I find it far fetched.

 

[jbradt]

I hadn't looked a whole lot at Chill, but 2H does make an interesting point.

 

[TwoHobbies]

I thought about it earlier but didn't want to mention it then. Thought I would give him a while to show.Another thing is I've been on a lot 10-5. Look back, he was always around a little while I was. Can't speak much for his 5-midnight. Just seems at this final point if he wasn't going to be on he would have maybe mentioned it.

 

[the wizard]

Just got back to the game.

Whether or not the town wants to hear my input, I think there is something that you need to hear.

I was going over the scenario, you believe Dag, stake me, and the slayer misses a vamp.

Very dangerous. I checked back to the previous vampire game and here is a bit of info that might bear consideration.

We speculated the # of vamps. Ice a confirmed vamp said 3. that would mean 2 to start the game.

now I know why he wanted to continue and was confident of the win.

In the original vampire game, they started with 2 vamps. the difference is that in this game the GC got a hit, The slayer gets 3. that's 4 hits not in the previous game. since the bite is only 50/50 and not a guaranteed turn I would think LR would have balanced it a little more so as to be fair all the way around.

We have been assuming the whole game that there were fewer vamps than there are.

I vote to stake Dag.

 

[the wizard]

Is it really ultra conservative after all of yesterday trying to implicate him? If you look at nightfall after Kashta was staked, within 5 minutes of each other wiz and ice both voted for FF.

One more reason to not believe Dag. This is a scum tactic trying to implicate someone that may be innocent?

Tell me Dag how many vamps are there right now?

 

[Dagamoth]

One more reason to not believe Dag. This is a scum tactic trying to implicate someone that may be innocent?

Tell me Dag how many vamps are there right now?

Right now there are either 2 or 3. If you turn out to be Dracula there is only 1 other vampire now. If you are not Dracula that means there are 3 vampires. When I investigated you I only found out that you are a vampire, not if you are Dracula. The way the last nightfall was written, dracula let his subordinate do the biting meaning there is at least Dracula + 1 other, since JM showed after that to be only a regular vampire it means that Dracula is still out there. If you are not Dracula that means that there is Dracula + yourself + the newest turn out there.

 

[noodles62]

Just got back to the game.

Whether or not the town wants to hear my input, I think there is something that you need to hear.

I was going over the scenario, you believe Dag, stake me, and the slayer misses a vamp.

Very dangerous. I checked back to the previous vampire game and here is a bit of info that might bear consideration.

We speculated the # of vamps. Ice a confirmed vamp said 3. that would mean 2 to start the game.

now I know why he wanted to continue and was confident of the win.

In the original vampire game, they started with 2 vamps. the difference is that in this game the GC got a hit, The slayer gets 3. that's 4 hits not in the previous game. since the bite is only 50/50 and not a guaranteed turn I would think LR would have balanced it a little more so as to be fair all the way around.

We have been assuming the whole game that there were fewer vamps than there are.

I vote to stake Dag.

Wiz, you are really grasping at straws here. This is a numbers game; why would Dag have come out and outed Ice, a "supposed" team mate when they only win by outnumbering the townies? It makes no sense for a Vamp to false role claim only to kill one of their own. They lost 2 last night with JM getting hit and you are desparate. The townies still have 3 PR's plus some regular townies - we are ahead thus in my opinion we have the luxury of lynching (staking) you to further solidify Dag's RC. Get over it. Short of a miracle you are a goner and your true role will sooon be made public.....