Mafia 81: The Bloody Coup

pulled your post about 2h , I think I skimmed over it......:pc:

anyways, how do you see it as a simple mistake? I don't see anything in his posts to suggest a simple mistake, all I see is him subtley trying to get people lynched, and then deteriorating as he gets caught.

how i c it as a simple mistake he freaked on someone for practically randomly voting him ( again i already said this) if he did not do such a thing he would not be in the situation he is in now.
 
it was a honest noobish mistake u make them and so does everyone now and again. i don't think he should be lynched for making a small mistake i could be wrong so can everybody sometimes I'm just not seeing it.

I don't see any mistake other than 2H twisting what I said...but if he's scum that really isn't a mistake, is it? I don't like it when people so easily pass on a conversation that has been a major focal point during the course of the game.
 
how i c it as a simple mistake he freaked on someone for practically randomly voting him ( again i already said this) if he did not do such a thing he would not be in the situation he is in now.

Where is this "freak out"?

Pulling posts to back up what you say goes a long way in stopping the confusion before it starts.
 
correction those were fluffy post from the first day the thread was open the second day i said i wasn't going to be here so i could not post anything useful and i was called out during that day so today when i got on i made helpful post it just seems like i was called out cause people didnt know i was going to be away on tues including u even though i posted that i wasn't going to be here. so i was not satisfied with my football posts alone.
No...your first post back today was about football. Then when someone called you on it you started posting other things. Remember this post...
 
here's the second quote I forgot to add to my last post...

09/04/10 vs. Purdue
media-icon-tv.gif
Notre Dame, Ind. W, 23-12 09/11/10 vs. Michigan
media-icon-tv.gif
Notre Dame, Ind. L, 28-24 09/18/10 at Michigan State
media-icon-tv.gif
East Lansing, Mich. L, 34-31 09/25/10 vs. Stanford
media-icon-tv.gif
Notre Dame, Ind. L, 37-14 10/02/10 at Boston College
media-icon-tv.gif
Chestnut Hill, Mass. W, 31-13 10/09/10 vs. Pittsburgh
media-icon-tv.gif
Notre Dame, Ind. W, 23-17 10/16/10 vs. Western Michigan
media-icon-tv.gif
Notre Dame, Ind. 2:30 p.m. ET 10/23/10 at Navy
media-icon-tv.gif
East Rutherford, N.J. 12:00 p.m. ET 10/30/10 vs. Tulsa
media-icon-tv.gif
Notre Dame, Ind. 2:30 p.m. ET 11/13/10 vs. Utah
media-icon-tv.gif
Notre Dame, Ind. 2:30 p.m. ET 11/20/10 vs. Army
media-icon-tv.gif
Bronx, N.Y. (Yankee Stadium) 7:00 p.m. ET 11/27/10 at USC
media-icon-tv.gif
Los Angeles, Calif. 5:00 p.m. PT my bad i ment western Michigan
 
so you don't have any thoughts about 2H, Chill's vote on me, or anything else other than that?

Interesting that you're still concerned about Chill's vote. I don't see a whole lot of people still talking about it...I think Kash brought it up when she posted a list but it seems like you're subtly trying to get some back up from other players.
 
Why wouldn't someone be concerned about a single vote? Votes are how you can determine innocents from scum, and you can start figuring out whos what by looking at vote patterns. (and other things of course, like post abnormalities, easy to defend themself, slip ups ect.)
I think you totally overreacted to a single vote. It's something people seem to do more when they're scummy, guilty conscience I guess. So is your conscience guilty?

look zaffy I said i would be not posting on tues. Also it's d1 nothing to important or of good quality ever happens or is posted on day one especially the first day of the thread.So ur reasons are meaning less to me and plain scummy so I vote to take the soul of zaffy

That is totally not true. Often day 1 can be very useful to look back on later in the game.

i already said i could not post on tuesday and yes i do 2H is acting scummy from one vote and made it many more so his fault he probly could of gotten away with just that one and been fine but he posted scummishly and now he is paying the price. I think 2H is innocent he just made a mistake and went off on a vote. Which is the reason i am voting for zaffy instead of him.

Why are you intent on defending 2H? What would make you think he was innocent? I don't think a single one of y'all is innocent at this point in the game.

Night fall in 4 hrs

Pms as needed


Day votes

FF-1 Dawg(128)

2H-6- Pir(173) Rich(283) Wiz(277) FF(294) Bally(300) Jpap(332)

Noods-1- Kash(175)

UN-1- Chill(238)

Zaffy-2- LG(275) NPR(320)

NPR-1 Zaffy(270)

no votes:

Lab Noods UN DD 2H

Holy train on 2H! I do see how he's twisted jpap's words, and Piglet's defense of 2H makes me want to vote for him (either 2H or Piglet). But I do not want to jump onto that train. With an estimated 8 scum, a vote looking like that makes me think an innocent is currently up for the lynch. Both scum teams have likely taken advantage of the fact that 2H may have come out too aggressive and they're more than happy to let him take the noose on night 1. They probably each have a player on him, and have spread out their votes amongst the others. Without one of their own up for the lynch, there is no need to move. Not to mention, a train vote for the lynch does not provide the town with much information.

I'm still thinking about where my vote will land. I'll probably place it in the next few minutes, but I want to re-read a couple of things before doing so.
 
AquariaCentral.com