First post, nothing really except we all know how thorough Kash is on things, I know when I've been the mod she has come up with things I never even thought about or dreamed anyone would think about...for her not to notice there was nothing about what would happen in the event of a tie, I dunno could be nothing but it does stand out to me.I have oh so many reasons to vote Wizard - just not one of them have anything to do with mafia games. <lmao>
The rules are pretty straightforward, can't see anything that raises questions, and nothing else to go on yet. I'll check in again sometime during work whenever I get a chance.
This post has a couple things that "bug" me a bit. First she questions Wizard about his vote on me, adding that he didn't say why he voted me...although she even highlighted the fact he said "to avoid UD" I think that was pretty much his "reason". I understand she was most likely trying to get more from him, but he also stated in that post he wouldn't be back before nightfall.This might be the only time I can get to the thread before night... and I won't be here for nightfall so I need to vote somewhere.
Okay... understand the need to vote early, but you didn't say why. What's your reason for picking LG over everyone else?
That statement sounds flakey, Pappy. Since when has DD not wanted to get into it with you?
Maybe yes; maybe no. Perhaps we should simply we ask him before considering it or speculating over it.
Piglet: Did you make random role assignments or chose them yourself?
That addresses the stuff I found to ask about so far. From this, the more curious point would be Pappy's comment I think, so I'll vote early based on that.
I vote to lynch Jpappy.
JP and DD poking at each other is very typical for both of them. I don't see how Pap can say that's a red flag of any sort.
You never said anything about that in your posts before. You only said (and I quote) "This quick flurry of posts seems like a big jump to me...didn't even let UN respond." from your post. That was all you said in relation to Bally at the time, and was the only thing you openly said you felt her vote worthy for. So now, why are you adding to your argument after A) you voted, and B) nightfall ended? Changing your story just isn't the townie way to go.
So, to make my various reasoning easier for others to understand, I'll post it all again here:
1- Pappy is changing his story. Scummy...
2- Pappy voted Bally over nothing more then 3 rapid succession posts and not waiting for UN to respond. UN could have taken hours to reply, no one would bother waiting that long. If he came up with a good defense, then the vote could simply be removed.
3- He dislikes lolpics. Only evil can dislike those.
4- I feel as though the whole "voted FF, retracted vote, voted Bally" thing was pre-planned.
Upon that reasoning, I vote to lynch Pappy. Sorry, buddy, but I think your evil.
A couple of people have commented on this so far...thought it would be nice to actually take UN's post in context:
Looks to me like UN is just trying to poke fun at NPR's misspell.
I find it interesting that Bally jumped on it, going as far to pull last games player list. Seeing as I just had Kash misinterpret my sarcasm, it's not entirely impossible that it was just that...but I personally think it is obvious that UN has played with Kash. No one here is new...
This quick flurry of posts seems like a big jump to me...didn't even let UN respond.
So, if Bally is evil, I'm innocent? Care to explain is the simplest terms possible how you came to that conclusion? Think "I'm talking to a 4 year old".
I agree, she may have very well missed the sarcasm. But what I find interesting is that somehow Bally would then think that UN was being serious about not knowing Kashta. I'm pretty sure all of us have played more than one game with everyone on this game's player list...
in other words you just paid attention to the parts that were already being discussed. Had you been actually trying to figure out my posts (and my alignment...) you would've read the whole post.LG, you have a twisted, twisted mind... :barf:
I thought you were referring to the actual content of his post, not the "wood" comment... Look at how differently we saw his post there... :rofl: