Mafia 92: Night of the living Mafia... the play

[IceH2O]

Even if it was the best available case? Just curious.

It would have to be better then the one I thought I had, then I'd have to hope that my suspects were trying to distance. Further along in the game a suspect on a suspect doesn't matter as much because I've had time to track out my thoughts better.
But the case on Razz is a possible slip, and like I said its possible but I like my case on Mad/Doom better especially since it seems to be getting a lot more play then i thought it would generate from the 2 of them.

 

[jpappy789]

Ok, now im all confused and flustered, I will do my best to explain

I was concerned with the fact that Tank just dumped off a vote on a non contributing player, it seems like he was trying to just toss the vote away to avoid making a decision.
-does the fact that it was a low poster have to do with anything? -- Only in the sense that at the time many people (including myself) had low post count, but putting that vote on the lowest person would have drawn more attention, so I believe that Tank picked a "moderatly" low poster and voted there.

In regards to this post, I was referring to that Labby brought up Tanks reason for the vote, that there was a train, not that the train was Labbys reason for possibly voting for Tank.

I hope this clears things up.

That doesn't even come close to answering my latest question on your inconsistent answers.

I vote to lynch C note

 

[IceH2O]

Ok, now im all confused and flustered, I will do my best to explain

I was concerned with the fact that Tank just dumped off a vote on a non contributing player, it seems like he was trying to just toss the vote away to avoid making a decision.
-does the fact that it was a low poster have to do with anything? -- Only in the sense that at the time many people (including myself) had low post count, but putting that vote on the lowest person would have drawn more attention, so I believe that Tank picked a "moderatly" low poster and voted there.

In regards to this post, I was referring to that Labby brought up Tanks reason for the vote, that there was a train, not that the train was Labbys reason for possibly voting for Tank.

I hope this clears things up.

well that was alott to catch up on. sorry to see you go ff... now we are one step back from the word go. i just read most of the thread and im just going to sayit rather than pull every post. D-Day i dont like how you are trying to start trains on people.. first you tryto start a case on jm but wehn that dosent work you switch over to ff that started to work and you forced him out of the game. all seems scummy to me therefore my vote is on you

I VOTE TO LYNCH D-DAY

There is a big difference between saying there is a train and saying someone is trying to start a train. I think everyone that makes a case is trying to start a train as you'd want as many votes as possible on that person. But some of the rest of that post by Tank does give me something to think about. I don't think anyone is building cases to try and make someone quit.

But to base your vote on him picking a middle low poster as a hideaway vote is really strange to me too unless maybe you think its a distancing vote. I could see that, maybe not something I'd vote on Day 1 but something I would look back on later in the game.

 

[RazzleFish]

Ok, now im all confused and flustered, I will do my best to explain

I was concerned with the fact that Tank just dumped off a vote on a non contributing player, it seems like he was trying to just toss the vote away to avoid making a decision.
-does the fact that it was a low poster have to do with anything? -- Only in the sense that at the time many people (including myself) had low post count, but putting that vote on the lowest person would have drawn more attention, so I believe that Tank picked a "moderatly" low poster and voted there.

In regards to this post, I was referring to that Labby brought up Tanks reason for the vote, that there was a train, not that the train was Labbys reason for possibly voting for Tank.

I hope this clears things up.

C-note, I still am not following how you think that voting off a person who isn't helping the town is worse than voting off a contributer. While yes I would like to vote off either Ice or Mad but I can't decide who is mafia (if either) so my vote will likely not land on them tonight. So now looking into other players, why not vote for someone who isn't helping the town all that much? IMO, (without any leads, gut feelings or slips) an unhelpful person seems like a better person to lynch over someone who is contributing. Would you agree with that?

I'll be back with a few posts in a little bit.

 

[jpappy789]

That type of vote placing would likely require coaching. I believe Tank said him/herself that they have only played 4-5 games. Not only that but a vote that contrived would need a much more convincing reason than what Tank gave us. To say that Tank actually picked DDay out of everyone else seems far fetched. Possible, but looking at the reasoning Tank used for the vote it seems much more like a misunderstanding of terminology like Lab suggested. That is not to say it is not a scummy misunderstanding however.

 

[noodles62]

Eagerly awaiting this discovery...

Any particular reason you are waiting on my infinite wisdom instead of coming up with your own theories? For the record, I work for a living.

Now, I pulled the quotes on a particular person but I did not really find what I originally suspected - not clearing this person but not ready to "call them out".
In regards to Razz, I will consent that it is possible that he just worded his post badly, but it very well could have been a slip. I will hold off on voting him for the moment and continue to see how it plays out. Still on the fence with Tank, but I need to read over again before I attempt to make a vote on anyone.

 

[noodles62]

C-note, I still am not following how you think that voting off a person who isn't helping the town is worse than voting off a contributer. While yes I would like to vote off either Ice or Mad but I can't decide who is mafia (if either) so my vote will likely not land on them tonight. So now looking into other players, why not vote for someone who isn't helping the town all that much? IMO, (without any leads, gut feelings or slips) an unhelpful person seems like a better person to lynch over someone who is contributing. Would you agree with that?

I'll be back with a few posts in a little bit.

no - a townie is a townie regardless of how helpful they are - you still need the warm bodies to win the game.

 

[jpappy789]

C-note, I still am not following how you think that voting off a person who isn't helping the town is worse than voting off a contributer. While yes I would like to vote off either Ice or Mad but I can't decide who is mafia (if either) so my vote will likely not land on them tonight. So now looking into other players, why not vote for someone who isn't helping the town all that much? IMO, (without any leads, gut feelings or slips) an unhelpful person seems like a better person to lynch over someone who is contributing. Would you agree with that?

I'll be back with a few posts in a little bit.

You're veering the conversation in a different direction, and in a rather pointless direction I might add. Contribution and role are apples and oranges. One should be looking for scum and not settling for voting off useless people with the idea that even if they are innocent that it will somehow hurt the town less.

 

[Lab_Rat]

I'm getting an Ice/Razz team vibe from this. You seem awfully soft on razz here, almost apologetic ("but mad is voting him").

I don't see anything apologetic here. I see Ice not wanting to vote along those he suspects. I don't understand why Ice puts Razz as a distant third on his list though. Ice, are you so confident in Mad/Doom to list Razz as "distant"?

So now looking into other players, why not vote for someone who isn't helping the town all that much? IMO, (without any leads, gut feelings or slips) an unhelpful person seems like a better person to lynch over someone who is contributing. Would you agree with that?

It seems better to lynch a person who is scum. Scum "contribute" by muddying the waters and may look active. I know this isn't your first game Razz, was this another slip?

 

[TankHobbyist]

It's just a game FF. I hope you get things handled, it sounds like you're under some stress. We'll be here when you're ready to play again.



I posted a single sentence towards him. If you think I'm scum and our plan is to drive the town crazy to the point that they quit. You are drastically over estimating my gameplay.

Talk about flimsy cases.

what game play? the 11 post that you have that contribute nothing to the town for rooting out scum?