Mafia 92: Night of the living Mafia... the play

[Dangerdoll]

yes, it is possible, but if that was the case a Razz/Noods team might make more sense...knowing that it would end up being a tie between C-note and Razz, which would lead to no lynch, Noods might have taken advantage of the situation and decided which to vote for. that would clear herself and hopefully C-note, because having two mafia up for lynch on day 1 is "slim to none". just a thought.

it might be slim, but stranger things have happened. I just don't want everyone to stop considering someone because they think the odds of it are one way. Odds are a tough thing.

 

[jpappy789]

DD, I have mulled over the idea of Noods being scum but, I believe I even posted this...I just find it highly unlikely. I for one am not giving Noods any free pass.

However, I still do find it interesting that when Noods asked for any slips of hers you pulled a post I would hardly count as a slip. Not even close, IMO. You may not be making a case for Noods but it seems like you are still trying to subtly push for doubting her innocence. I think you know that you cannot fully back peddle for the attempt to call out Noods for these apparent "slips" you mentioned last night which is why you have now taken it upon yourself to make sure no one thinks she is 100% innocent. I think we all know well enough that aside from the mod revealing the roles there is not such guarantee in these games.

 

[Dangerdoll]

DD, I have mulled over the idea of Noods being scum but, I believe I even posted this...I just find it highly unlikely. I for one am not giving Noods any free pass.

However, I still do find it interesting that when Noods asked for any slips of hers you pulled a post I would hardly count as a slip. Not even close, IMO. You may not be making a case for Noods but it seems like you are still trying to subtly push for doubting her innocence. I think you know that you cannot fully back peddle for the attempt to call out Noods for these apparent "slips" you mentioned last night which is why you have now taken it upon yourself to make sure no one thinks she is 100% innocent. I think we all know well enough that aside from the mod revealing the roles there is not such guarantee in these games.

I said one of the two I found could be construed as a slip because she was claiming others to have slips that's all and I was comparing it to her slip/typo. She asked me to show her where her slip was because all she had were typos. I showed her that although she cleared it up... without that clearing up, it could have been a slip I didn't like the fact that she was pointing slips out when she had one that could have been seen as one.

For the record, although I do not consider her all out innocent but I don't think she's one of those we should be concentrating on yet.

 

[Dangerdoll]

and it was not a back peddle, but an explanation of my thought that Noods had asked me to find and post for her.

 

[the wizard]

Kash, you say you printed the thread out to read it overnight to get a handle on it.... did you not see where it was kinda scummy to keep rehashing the points about the zombies and their hits? Too much focusing on something that was deliberated on long enough... scummy







more discussion of the zombie hits.... were you guys not satisfied with what was talked about yesterday... or are you trying to keep it in the air to hide from the real task of rooting out you mafia guys?



not sure what is bothering you about it.... can you explain?


Now Noods goes back to the zombie points...



Actually, it's this point that makes me a little more suspicious of Noods... Evidently Noods, as you post your typo fixes after some of your posts, you are actually pointing o8ut what could be typo's of other folks. Why such a highlight on suspecting folks with typos?

I am still catching up from getting home from work... but these were my thoughts up to this point.... I didn't want to lose my thoughts halfway through

Razz had posted that he had had a theory but didn't want to post it(after FF had left the game) and Dawg was asking why he didn't post it. DD states she doesn't see what would be bothering Dawg about it.

Noods points out a slip from Razz when he was discussing the zombie hits and DD attempts to paint Noods as trying to rehash the Zombie discussion well after it has been clarified.

Holy smokes, I don't ever remember a Day 1 being so busy before!!



I dunno.... ever since Noods played the typo's are scum card, I guess I am a bit more alert to the "slips" posts. Could this tie Noods and Labby together, I dunno... but it does look odd.


the bolded point cracked me up


hmmm.... this kinda caught my attention too...


I will bet being scum so there is no need...



sorry, had to work late.... had no clue that day 1 would be so much to read.... 9 pages!!

ok, I didn't really see TOO much that I could find as scummy but let me put it out in a list from what I can pick off the top of my head. These are in no particular order.

Kash - continues to hash and rehash (rehash Kash) on the whole Zombie thing. We have been done with that for a while now... way before her posts about it. This is from Kash, once who pays a great deal of attention to detail.... or what I am used to her paying.

Noods - Typo patrol.... yet feels compelled to proofread her posts and puts out that she sees she has posted something wrong... is it supposed to appear as you are an innocent townie and you have noticed your mistake (or slip) before anyone else?

JM - I think with the whole FF thing and he appearing to be in alliance to FF, he feels like he has escaped being looked at as mafia. He continues to point at how unhelpful everyone else is in his path.... I was going to vote Kash off the top of my head but I feel compelled to vote JM...

CNote, Mad, Ice, Razz.... I can't get a read either way from each because as they are pointed at, they have understandable excuses. Are they scummy excuses? I cannot tell yet.

I vote to lynch JM

LR questions Ice as to why Razz was a "distant third" on his list and then poses a question to Razz. DD attempts to paint a Noods/LR team

Rich states that he would switch to CN to break the tie if needed then states he thinks the post count discussions don't mount to a hill of beans. DD flat out calls him scum for his post.

I find it interesting that she makes this statement. Especially with the slips and inconsistencies in CN and Razz's posts. It causes one to wonder if maybe she isn't trying to convince us that some weak links in the scum team are answering the questions put to them very well.

could be considered a "slip", one townie from the get go could be construed as 1 down, however many to go... but you cleared that up. To me, this looks like a slip that you hoped to appear innocent enough with correcting yourself... You call it typo I guess... or you might in order to try to clean it up for yourself.



this, I call a legitimate "typo"





I am interested in if this was someone that is still here. Why didn't you post who this was and your thoughts, Noods?


actually, I found one that could be seen as a slip or typo and one typo that was legitimate.

I am highlighting this because I was in the process of looking through your posts as I said I would. I am interested though Noods how yoiu came to vote so close to night and got a Mafia.... it's quite an accomplishment for a Day 1 lynch, kudo's to you but what was the clincher that made you switch?

The last post was pulled for the sole purpose of pointing out an inconsistency in DD's posting.
In the second post I pulled, she lists three players and he thoughts on them. Basically I see it as her suspect list. She stated that she was going to vote Kash but votes JM instead.

What strikes me as odd about that is that she has expended a lot of energy and time going after Noods and trying to paint her as scum but doesn't vote her.

She has defended Razz at every turn accusing those that went after him right up until nightfall.

I vote to lynch DD.

I think her posts are the common link that can help us lynch the scum team. If she is lynched and turns scum then I will return to my D1 vote of CN the following night.

 

[jpappy789]

I said one of the two I found could be construed as a slip because she was claiming others to have slips that's all and I was comparing it to her slip/typo. She asked me to show her where her slip was because all she had were typos. I showed her that although she cleared it up... without that clearing up, it could have been a slip I didn't like the fact that she was pointing slips out when she had one that could have been seen as one.

For the record, although I do not consider her all out innocent but I don't think she's one of those we should be concentrating on yet.

Uh, no you didn't...

You said, it "could be considered a "slip", one townie from the get go could be construed as 1 down, however many to go"

However Noods specifically said, "Being [down] one townie from the get go sucks"

Again, why would mafia say it "sucks" to have a townie flip from the get go? How would that be considered a slip?

Your construing makes absolutely no sense...call me crazy but I see no slip. None. Nada.

 

[jpappy789]

and it was not a back peddle, but an explanation of my thought that Noods had asked me to find and post for her.

I know it's not a back peddle. You're caught in a discussion that started before Noods nailed the coffin in a mafia member and in today's context your side of the discussion makes the least sense. However had you not then attempted to take it upon yourself to remind everyone that Noods is not guaranteed innocent I would think less of what you seem to be trying to make of all of this...

 

[Dangerdoll]

Razz had posted that he had had a theory but didn't want to post it(after FF had left the game) and Dawg was asking why he didn't post it. DD states she doesn't see what would be bothering Dawg about it.

Noods points out a slip from Razz when he was discussing the zombie hits and DD attempts to paint Noods as trying to rehash the Zombie discussion well after it has been clarified.

LR questions Ice as to why Razz was a "distant third" on his list and then poses a question to Razz. DD attempts to paint a Noods/LR team

Rich states that he would switch to CN to break the tie if needed then states he thinks the post count discussions don't mount to a hill of beans. DD flat out calls him scum for his post.

I find it interesting that she makes this statement. Especially with the slips and inconsistencies in CN and Razz's posts. It causes one to wonder if maybe she isn't trying to convince us that some weak links in the scum team are answering the questions put to them very well.



The last post was pulled for the sole purpose of pointing out an inconsistency in DD's posting.
In the second post I pulled, she lists three players and he thoughts on them. Basically I see it as her suspect list. She stated that she was going to vote Kash but votes JM instead.

What strikes me as odd about that is that she has expended a lot of energy and time going after Noods and trying to paint her as scum but doesn't vote her.

She has defended Razz at every turn accusing those that went after him right up until nightfall.

I vote to lynch DD.

I think her posts are the common link that can help us lynch the scum team. If she is lynched and turns scum then I will return to my D1 vote of CN the following night.

I did not call Rich scum for that post. I said that there was no need because I had suspected JM as well and voted JM.

I have no problem voting CN or Ice. I wrote that because I had just got home from work and had to read 9 pages for day 1. I skimmed rather quickly and hadn't seen much of the slips or inconsistencies because I didn't feel like I had time to cypher carefully through each post and come to a decision. I just noticed Noods pointing out the slips and thought it odd because I saw her make one or one that could be considered a slip herself. She asked me to gather those posts and I did.

I didn't spend nearly as much time on Noods as I did for Kash who kept rehashing the zombie business and JM for his misdoings. I said my gut was to vote Kash but I voted JM to save the trouble for Rich.

you sir, are twisting my posts very cleverly though.

 

[Dangerdoll]

I know it's not a back peddle. You're caught in a discussion that started before Noods nailed the coffin in a mafia member and in today's context your side of the discussion makes the least sense. However had you not then attempted to take it upon yourself to remind everyone that Noods is not guaranteed innocent I would think less of what you seem to be trying to make of all of this...

I understand that... but I still think it's an important point. I have been blindsided by mafia before and hope to think I have learned from my past blindings.

 

[Dangerdoll]

Uh, no you didn't...

You said, it "could be considered a "slip", one townie from the get go could be construed as 1 down, however many to go"

However Noods specifically said, "Being [down] one townie from the get go sucks"

Again, why would mafia say it "sucks" to have a townie flip from the get go? How would that be considered a slip?

Your construing makes absolutely no sense...call me crazy but I see no slip. None. Nada.

whatever pappy.... I saw it as that, that's the point of the game.... to post what you perceive and this is what I perceived. You say tomato, I say tomato