i would get alot of information for you guys but you all will call it a fake. so i dont see the point in doing that.
I for one can promise with 100% certainty, that if you post information that isn't fake, I won't call it fake.
In all reality, I never called the previous links you posted fake either. Fake implies that the site is purposely misleading people. I don't believe that. I believe that the people on these sites and posting these videos are just like you. They fully believe what they are posting.
No, the sites aren't fake, but don't mistake that to mean that the information contained is true or factual, because it most certainly is not... unless of course it can be confirmed by at least one actual scientific study performed by an actual expert in astronomy, astrophysics, etc. Someone who is an actual recognized expert in interpreting what they see in the sky.
So far, the videos you've linked to have certainly shown a circle next to the sun, but without an expert to say that it's actually Nibiru, it could just as easily be a lens flare, a satellite, or in the case of some of the videos where it showed up even smaller (changing size in vids doesn't help the case for it's being true), it could easily have been one of the planets that every schoolkid knows are in the solar system, on it's normal orbit. The reason we're asking for actual verifiable scientifically based proof, is because of the long list of laws of physics that would have to be broken for it to actually be possible. Anyone who actually knows a little something about the way the universe works, knows that this is not possible. And unless there's an actual expert (not just a self proclaimed one) that can explain how it is actually possible, which laws of physics are being broken and can develop theories on how, and verify that they've been able to actually confirm the existence of Nibiru... no one that actually knows anything about how the universe works is going to believe anything about it, no matter how much amateur video is available or how many unqualified people make claims to it's existence.
Give me ANY topic, and I can find you at least 100 sites on the web that say it's true, and at least 100 sites that say it's not. It's a matter of who you choose to believe. In matters of science, it's best to believe scientists. In matters of history, it's best to believe historians. In matters of biology, it's best to believe biologists. Why? Because they are experts, and they actually know what they're talking about!
Here, I'll put it in terms that may be easier to relate to:
Trusting sources like the ones you've been posting, is just as effective a method of learning the truth... as trusting the answers you get from random people on Yahoo Answers about caring for fish.
