Mafia #99: The ACville Files- Game Thread

For example, you were the second vote on LG on N1. You followed Rich(a confirmed innocent) very convenient spot to be if you are scum.

You were the second vote on Ice N2. Again, very convenient spot.

You either don't make your own decisions and just follow other's thoughts and votes, you decided that you could go with that vote at that time and be hidden among the votes, or you were advised by your team to vote there so you would not draw too much attention.

Which is it?
 
the wizard said:
For example, you were the second vote on LG on N1. You followed Rich(a confirmed innocent) very convenient spot to be if you are scum.
You were the second vote on Ice N2. Again, very convenient spot.

You either don't make your own decisions and just follow other's thoughts and votes, you decided that you could go with that vote at that time and be hidden among the votes, or you were advised by your team to vote there so you would not draw too much attention.

Which is it?
Click to expand...

n1 was random and the vote was made when i had the chance to make it. n2 ice was my most suspicious candidate. i didnt follow anyone.
 
allaboutfish said:
wiz said that we should look at the people the voted innocents twice so i was being helpful so we could see both vote counts.
Click to expand...

Being helpful and trying to appear helpful are two different things. Being helpful is posting both nights together so we can compare them. FWIW, being helpful is reading enough to know that Wiz already did this. Trying to appear helpful is posting one night of votes (that you later say is inconclusive) and saying "see how helpful I am"?

allaboutfish said:
how can we base anything off night one?
Click to expand...
If this is how you feel about it, why did you post the vote count from night 1? You could just as easily have called Wiz out for looking into something that you think is not helpful.
 
The fact that you voted innocents both nights, and that you haven't done any questioning to help root out scum makes you suspect. That is how this game works. Is that line of thought foolproof? No, but it beats drawing a name out of a hat to place your vote.
 
i didnt post both of them together bc dun had already posted n2's votes. i dont think its reliable, i know that scum would vote innocents both nights but i know for a fact an innocent could do it to.
 
the wizard said:
The fact that you voted innocents both nights, and that you haven't done any questioning to help root out scum makes you suspect. That is how this game works. Is that line of thought foolproof? No, but it beats drawing a name out of a hat to place your vote.
Click to expand...

all i can do is try my best. i try to ask questions but i cant do it as easily as yall do.
 
allaboutfish said:
i didnt post both of them together bc dun had already posted n2's votes. i dont think its reliable, i know that scum would vote innocents both nights but i know for a fact an innocent could do it to.
Click to expand...

Vote counts, including D1, are data. This is a game of strategy. Analysis of data is how you figure things out. Analyzing vote counts and patterns isn't fool proof but, it is very helpful.
 
allaboutfish said:
i didnt post both of them together bc dun had already posted n2's votes. i dont think its reliable, i know that scum would vote innocents both nights but i know for a fact an innocent could do it to.
Click to expand...

Who is an example of an innocent who voted for another innocent both nights? Since it is a fact you can back this claim up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
AquariaCentral.com
Top Bottom