Mafia 103...the play

[Lab_Rat]

That's very unlike you to have an oversight like that. It would also be unlike you to leave a scummate off your list, so I'm torn on why Rich wasn't up there.

 

[jbradt]

That's very unlike you to have an oversight like that. It would also be unlike you to leave a scummate off your list, so I'm torn on why Rich wasn't up there.

It would be unlike me if I were purposely trying to be thorough. As it was, I wasn't. It happened just like I said. But you have to decide whether or not you believe that or not.

 

[user_name]

Actually, in looking again, AAF was listed twice. So there were 9 in the game, which leaves me and Rich that I didn't comment on. Would you like to know my thoughts about myself too? I still think it's interesting that you focused on Rich not being there as opposed to the information that was there...

If there wasn't information there, then why not say something along the lines of what you said about dawg?

 

[Nepherael]

I believe the only two that switched their vote to AAF were you and UN...unless you are talking switching their thoughts of who to vote for....

I wasn't even talking about votes. Was talking about just the posting and if there were people that were bandwagoning. Might have been, might not have. Like I said, I'd have to really go back and look that's why I was talking hypothetically (I don't have the best memory so I have to go back a lot and reread if I'm trying to make connections). Just wanted to get some of my ideas down on paper so to speak. Maybe there's something to it, maybe not but there are quite a few people in here more clever than I am.

 

[jbradt]

If there wasn't information there, then why not say something along the lines of what you said about dawg?

what does this even mean? I answered the question about why I didn't mention Rich. Accept the answer or not. I'll say it one last time. I didn't even think of him when I wrote the post. If I didn't think of him, then I can't say something along the lines of what I said about Dawg, now can I?

 

[user_name]

I vote to lynch Neph. Very interesting turning and dodging going on.

I expect to be back way before ten but I have a party to go to and you never know what will happen.

This was posted at 10:34.

I don't have a whole lot of time today between yard work and going out later, so I'll try to be concise about where I stand at the moment.

Neph: this is an interesting situation. What it comes down to for me is that it feels more like a newb put on the hot seat and going to far to defend himself. We've seen this time and time again with new players. I'm not discounting the fact that he could be scum, but I'm not feeling it... yet. I'm also a little taken aback by how many people piled on the questioning.

RB: I definitely still suspect RB, but I don't have enough to place a vote at this point.

Labby: I may have misspoke when I used WIFOM. What I was trying to get at is that she stopped in to pose a question that we really cannot know the answer to. Neph says he forgot and checked his email at just the right time, many don't believe that. My point is that it is not like Labby to throw out a question like that without giving an opinion of her own. Come to think of it, I haven't seen any new information added by Ms. Rat so far. A couple questions, a couple responses to questions... no real content whatsoever. I've seen Labby play when she was busy before, and she's always been about kicking bushes and trying to help... when she's innocent. I haven't seen a bit of that so far.

Pappy: I don't know what to think about Pappy. Then again I never do. I need to see more to make a decision.

Dawg: No real read yet.

AAF: still think it's funny how he pushed so hard at Neph. Then as others have pointed out backtracked pretty quickly. It definitely doesn't look good for him, but this happens a lot with the dude.

UN: posted largely crap so far. It's kind of funny to me how he questions Neph and AAF, then ends up voting RB.

I've got to think some more before I'm ready to vote, but it will likely come down to either Labby, AAF, or UN at the moment. I'm leaning toward Labby, but I'd hate to lose her if she is innocent. Hopefully something will happen to solidify my feelings one way or the other.

This was posted at 11:24, and there were no posts in between JB's list and Rich's post.

 

[Nepherael]

Scum do this all the time.

Ha, I wonder if it has ever worked to the point of making people change their votes? I guess now that I think about it more it does seem a bit like a last ditch effort. Not positive but I think AAF and I are tied on votes so I guess we shall see pending the random number generator

 

[allaboutfish]

neph- aaf, rich, rb
lab rat- jb
aaf- jp, neph, un
un- lab rat
i think this is right.

 

[jbradt]

This was posted at 10:34.



This was posted at 11:24, and there were no posts in between JB's list and Rich's post.

So? You're really torqued about this dude. What exactly are you trying to say? Are you trying to say that I'm scum because of that?

 

[user_name]

what does this even mean? I answered the question about why I didn't mention Rich. Accept the answer or not. I'll say it one last time. I didn't even think of him when I wrote the post. If I didn't think of him, then I can't say something along the lines of what I said about Dawg, now can I?

I thought you were saying that you didn't mention him because you had no information, looking at the post now it reads more like you were asking me why I wasn't questioning the contents of the post, rather than what the post lacked. It's too early for me to really go back and compare it to anything, as we've only had one night of voting and I only know 2 roles so far: That FF was innocent and my own.