I'm sure it has - whenever someone casts doubt on popular opinion at the time, they're looked on without favor and not trustworthy. It wouldn't be a mafia game if a loud and occasionall opinionated person like me, was to go unnoticed and unquestioned, and of course, I am not threatened by that, nor do I feel challenged by the need to defend any of my actions. It's par the game, a game I've been out of much.
You'll note that I've ever been one to feel the need to correct or clarify, and that's what I've done - remember there have only ever been 4 doctors, it's a mysterious role and one with confusion. (Who would die first? Can the doctor save themselves? Do they know who any one is before saving them? And on and on.)
If you feel my radar has gone up, because I'm not throwing my vote behind Mee-mee, well I'm not surprised by that. But you'll note, I've never thrown my vote behind popular opinion, unless I feel a good take on someone. Which would have definitely been Corey Lover the other night, (which didn't happen unfortunately).
As you said, we each have our suspects, and indeed, what will happen will happen. But that doesn't mean I can't run with my own game, and not follow behind someone else's claims of ESP or whatever it is... I can put my vote where I strongly believe it. And then I can defend it, because mafia as you know, tend to pick people out of the blue to throw at the ever angry mob *lol*, or they line up a stack behind a train already going (which incidentally is exactly where I think this is going.) How will you tell the mafia apart, again, from a myriad of votes?? At this point, like Corey Lover, you'd expect them to throw in the towel and blend in with the crowd. With Corey Lover, I would agree, but the case isn't so clear with me like it is with Judgemax, and I don't LIKE to throw a meaningless vote into the crowd, that just feels like I'm wasting time and not doing my job by picking out the suspicious ones, and I've never voted that way before, I refuse to start now.