The beta thing is kind of getting a one sided review here. Just for the fun of offering antithesis, I'll throw out something. Fish personality depends partly on the species, but also on the specimen. Are 2 typical female betas likely to get along? Maybe not. On the other hand, judging some betas as all betas can be seen as a non sequitur.
So then, what about observations on different variations or specimens of betas? Has there been an exception to this rule? If so, what are the relevant variables that may have caused this exception? What changes in water chemistry, tank mates, aquascaping and countless other variables could cause something like a loss of agression, a change in social dynamics (greater enemies or dithers for instance), or simple line of sight alteration?
And finally, how much of this does the individual asking the question care to look in to it? Is it a reasonable use of their time?
I'm not saying the outcome is one way or the other. I am rather trying to encourage discussion over making absolutes of generalities. As I have said before, discus aren't in the hobby because of the individuals who shooed the prospective keeper away by saying, "they're too hard to keep." They're around because people asked questions and examined the puzzle in front of them.
Other than that, I have heard that the Y. (what happened to them being a botia?) sidthemunki are endangered in the wild. You may want to look in to it, and confirm that it's nothing wild caught. I know breeding botia can be difficult at times; hormone injections can be used. This might encourage people to just take them out of a river and slap them on aquabid, etc. despite any protective status in their native country. Wish I had time for sources, but I'm heading out pretty quick. I think one of axelrod's FW atlases made mention of it all.
So then, what about observations on different variations or specimens of betas? Has there been an exception to this rule? If so, what are the relevant variables that may have caused this exception? What changes in water chemistry, tank mates, aquascaping and countless other variables could cause something like a loss of agression, a change in social dynamics (greater enemies or dithers for instance), or simple line of sight alteration?
And finally, how much of this does the individual asking the question care to look in to it? Is it a reasonable use of their time?
I'm not saying the outcome is one way or the other. I am rather trying to encourage discussion over making absolutes of generalities. As I have said before, discus aren't in the hobby because of the individuals who shooed the prospective keeper away by saying, "they're too hard to keep." They're around because people asked questions and examined the puzzle in front of them.
Other than that, I have heard that the Y. (what happened to them being a botia?) sidthemunki are endangered in the wild. You may want to look in to it, and confirm that it's nothing wild caught. I know breeding botia can be difficult at times; hormone injections can be used. This might encourage people to just take them out of a river and slap them on aquabid, etc. despite any protective status in their native country. Wish I had time for sources, but I'm heading out pretty quick. I think one of axelrod's FW atlases made mention of it all.