Alpha7Bravo }-oo,o> Oct 3, 2006 37 0 0 Denver, CO Feb 19, 2007 #1 I just bought these and I have a feeling that they aren't aquatic at all even though they were marked so. Thanks for your help in advance.
I just bought these and I have a feeling that they aren't aquatic at all even though they were marked so. Thanks for your help in advance.
Pagan AC Members Feb 13, 2007 57 0 0 44 Cleve, Oh. Feb 19, 2007 #2 The first one looks like a Peacock fern, which isn't aquatic. I don't know about the second plant.
R RgTrace AC Members Jan 22, 2007 10 0 0 Feb 19, 2007 #3 I forget the name of the top of my head but no, the second plant is not aquatic. Sorry bud....
midiamin MidiAmin Jan 29, 2005 592 0 16 San Francisco Feb 19, 2007 #4 Second one is a Dracaena dermensis, striped. Definitely non aquatic!
Alpha7Bravo }-oo,o> Oct 3, 2006 37 0 0 Denver, CO Feb 19, 2007 #5 I have a couple new potted plants now. I'm off to find a reputable aquatic plant seller. Thanks for everyone's help.
I have a couple new potted plants now. I'm off to find a reputable aquatic plant seller. Thanks for everyone's help.
N ngochuynh AC Members Dec 10, 2006 45 0 6 Feb 19, 2007 #6 I have the second plant in my tank for 5 months now. It's growing really slowly but growing. I think it's some kind of lucky bamboo
I have the second plant in my tank for 5 months now. It's growing really slowly but growing. I think it's some kind of lucky bamboo
fballguy yum Feb 27, 2006 1,561 0 0 39 Everett, WA www.freshwaterfanatics.com Feb 20, 2007 #7 Definetly not aquatic. They may be fine for a little while, but they will soon start to rot, and foul the water.
Definetly not aquatic. They may be fine for a little while, but they will soon start to rot, and foul the water.