Here's a question. 1 gallon of bioballs has 21.5 sq ft of surface area, right?
A one inche long 1/4" diameter straw has a surface area of 1.6 cubic inches, if you include the inner and outer surfaces of the straw. (2 * pi * 1/4" * 1")
You could fit 16 of these 1 inch pieces into a 1 inch cube, for a total surface area of 16 * 1.6 = 25.6 square inches.
231 inches per gallon times 25.6 square inches divided by 144 square inches per square foot equals 41.1 sq feet of surface area per gallon! Almost double that of bioballs?
Are straws better than bioballs? Even if you subtract half of the outer surfaces of the straws because the outer surfaces contact each other, you end up with 3/4 * 41.1 sq feet = 30.8 sq ft - still better than bioballs.
What makes bioballs better? I read everywhere that hands down they are the best no questions asked - but if you set up straws so that they were parallel and the water flowed through them, wouldn't that work at least as well, if not better?
A one inche long 1/4" diameter straw has a surface area of 1.6 cubic inches, if you include the inner and outer surfaces of the straw. (2 * pi * 1/4" * 1")
You could fit 16 of these 1 inch pieces into a 1 inch cube, for a total surface area of 16 * 1.6 = 25.6 square inches.
231 inches per gallon times 25.6 square inches divided by 144 square inches per square foot equals 41.1 sq feet of surface area per gallon! Almost double that of bioballs?
Are straws better than bioballs? Even if you subtract half of the outer surfaces of the straws because the outer surfaces contact each other, you end up with 3/4 * 41.1 sq feet = 30.8 sq ft - still better than bioballs.
What makes bioballs better? I read everywhere that hands down they are the best no questions asked - but if you set up straws so that they were parallel and the water flowed through them, wouldn't that work at least as well, if not better?