Interesting read! Did you notice that the whole thing is basically an add for a competing technology, fluidized beds? The methodology of the experimentation was as scientific as a discussion about who'sthe most beautiul woman in the world. If anyone has interest in running a proper test for themselves, set up two identical tanks with the the two competing filters, brand new. Dose both tanks to 5ppm ammonia, and plot the levels of NH3 and N02. Keep the ammonia level at 5ppm with daily additions, as needed and keep track of exactly how much your adding to each tank. You will find in short order that you're adding more ammonia to the biowheel tank to maintain the 5ppm. That would be a reasonably scientific way to go about testing this, accepting the limits of home measuring and testing of course.I know this is an old thread, but I figured it was better to post here than make a new one.
This review said that the biowheel filters do work, but they aren't necessarily superior to power filters that use submerged biomedia. The author said that while the bio-wheel exposes the bacteria to more oxygen, it has much less surface area than a large sponge. This is the first "experiment" I've read about concerning the bio-wheels, so I found it to be pretty interesting. I use a Penguin 100 myself, though I've wondered what the hype is really all about. If anyone has done something similar to this, it'd be cool to read about your observations.