Some folks around here are upset that the Boston city council is calling this year's Christmas tree a "Holiday tree". So you understand the relevance, each year Halifax sends Boston a tree as a "thank-you" for the help Bostonians gave after the Halifax explosion.
So I put it to you folks:
Should we call Christmas trees "Holiday trees" in a bid to be more welcoming of, or less offensive to, other creeds, or is this political "correctness" run amok?
Since I started the thread, I get to post my opinion first.
Personally, I don't think that we should marginalize our culture to avoid "offending" others. So long, of course, as the elements of our culture do not involve actively attacking other cultures. We are a christian-based society and I believe that we, as others, are entitled to celebrate our traditions, which - agreed - are public. My point is that celebrating Christmas, whether it is a religeous or merely traditional, is - with the exception of the rampant consumerism - a celebration of peace, love, and togetherness. Certainly one cannot logically argue that this is offensive?
While we should be welcoming of other cultures, and envite them to share in our celebrations, and learn our culture while we learn from theirs, changing our culture demeans them as much as it demeans us. The celebration should be called a Holiday celebration, and all cutures should be envited to share elements of their seasonal celebration. However, the tree is a tradition of the Christian celebration the same as the menorah (sp?) is tradtional of Chanukah.
Perhaps my opinion is tainted by my desire to learn from other cultures, but my ideal would be to be able to share in the celebrations of multiple cultures so that I could better understand them. If they were like me, they would be offended that we changed something to suit them. I would want to experience the celebration as they do, and I wouldn't want a jewish person calling their menorah a "non-denominations candle holder" for fear of offending me.
- sorry if it looks like I've singled out Judaism, it's just the only other culture that I've shared in enough to know traditions for comparison -
So I put it to you folks:
Should we call Christmas trees "Holiday trees" in a bid to be more welcoming of, or less offensive to, other creeds, or is this political "correctness" run amok?
Since I started the thread, I get to post my opinion first.
Personally, I don't think that we should marginalize our culture to avoid "offending" others. So long, of course, as the elements of our culture do not involve actively attacking other cultures. We are a christian-based society and I believe that we, as others, are entitled to celebrate our traditions, which - agreed - are public. My point is that celebrating Christmas, whether it is a religeous or merely traditional, is - with the exception of the rampant consumerism - a celebration of peace, love, and togetherness. Certainly one cannot logically argue that this is offensive?
While we should be welcoming of other cultures, and envite them to share in our celebrations, and learn our culture while we learn from theirs, changing our culture demeans them as much as it demeans us. The celebration should be called a Holiday celebration, and all cutures should be envited to share elements of their seasonal celebration. However, the tree is a tradition of the Christian celebration the same as the menorah (sp?) is tradtional of Chanukah.
Perhaps my opinion is tainted by my desire to learn from other cultures, but my ideal would be to be able to share in the celebrations of multiple cultures so that I could better understand them. If they were like me, they would be offended that we changed something to suit them. I would want to experience the celebration as they do, and I wouldn't want a jewish person calling their menorah a "non-denominations candle holder" for fear of offending me.
- sorry if it looks like I've singled out Judaism, it's just the only other culture that I've shared in enough to know traditions for comparison -